Coercion, compliance, and the collapse of the Soviet command economy

Are command systems that rest on coercion inherently unstable, and did the Soviet economy collapse for this reason? Until it collapsed, the Soviet economy did not appear unstable. Why, then, did it collapse? A game between a dictator and a producer shows that a high level of coercion may yield a sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Economic history review Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 397 - 433
Main Author: Harrison, Mark
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 01.08.2002
Blackwell Publishers
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
ISSN:0013-0117, 1468-0289
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Are command systems that rest on coercion inherently unstable, and did the Soviet economy collapse for this reason? Until it collapsed, the Soviet economy did not appear unstable. Why, then, did it collapse? A game between a dictator and a producer shows that a high level of coercion may yield a stable high-output equilibrium, that stability may rest in part on the dictator's reputation, and that a collapse may be brought about by adverse trends in the dictator's costs and a loss of reputation. The facts of the Soviet case are consistent with a collapse that was triggered by the strike movement of 1989.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-G91LHJ22-B
istex:26A6931A1030AB5B16DFC1B110F4A873B74944C2
ArticleID:EHR226
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0013-0117
1468-0289
DOI:10.1111/1468-0289.00226