Effect of Physical and Chemical Hair Removal Methods on Skin Barrier Function in vitro: Consequences for a Hydrophilic Model Permeant

Background: Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been systematically investigated. Thus, as a first step, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of hair removal through epila...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Skin pharmacology and physiology Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 8 - 21
Main Authors: Pany, Astrid, Klang, Victoria, Brunner, Marion, Ruthofer, Johanna, Schwarz, Elisabeth, Valenta, Claudia
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Basel, Switzerland S. Karger AG 01.01.2019
Subjects:
ISSN:1660-5527, 1660-5535, 1660-5535
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background: Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been systematically investigated. Thus, as a first step, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of hair removal through epilation (electric epilation, waxing) and depilation (dry and wet shaving, depilatory cream) on skin properties in vitro using the porcine ear model. Methods: Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, measurement of the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), visualization by capacitance-based contact imaging, confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), diffusion cell studies and tape stripping experiments were employed. Results: Increased TEWL and altered skin permittivity maps were observed. Decreased stratum corneum thickness was observed after waxing. Diffusion cell studies showed increased skin permeation especially in case of dry shaving, electric epilation and waxing. Conclusion: Considering CRS and diffusion cell data, a moderate if significant decrease in skin barrier function was found after hair removal by dry shaving (physical skin/material interaction) and epilation methods (plucking out the entire hair, for example, by electrical epilation and waxing). Subsequent experiments will include testing of different permeants covering a broad range of physicochemical properties in vitro and confirming our findings in vivo.
AbstractList Background: Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been systematically investigated. Thus, as a first step, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of hair removal through epilation (electric epilation, waxing) and depilation (dry and wet shaving, depilatory cream) on skin properties in vitro using the porcine ear model. Methods: Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, measurement of the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), visualization by capacitance-based contact imaging, confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), diffusion cell studies and tape stripping experiments were employed. Results: Increased TEWL and altered skin permittivity maps were observed. Decreased stratum corneum thickness was observed after waxing. Diffusion cell studies showed increased skin permeation especially in case of dry shaving, electric epilation and waxing. Conclusion: Considering CRS and diffusion cell data, a moderate if significant decrease in skin barrier function was found after hair removal by dry shaving (physical skin/material interaction) and epilation methods (plucking out the entire hair, for example, by electrical epilation and waxing). Subsequent experiments will include testing of different permeants covering a broad range of physicochemical properties in vitro and confirming our findings in vivo. Keywords: Damaged skin, Skin barrier function, Hair removal, Skin/material interaction, Shaving
Background: Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been systematically investigated. Thus, as a first step, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of hair removal through epilation (electric epilation, waxing) and depilation (dry and wet shaving, depilatory cream) on skin properties in vitro using the porcine ear model. Methods: Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, measurement of the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), visualization by capacitance-based contact imaging, confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), diffusion cell studies and tape stripping experiments were employed. Results: Increased TEWL and altered skin permittivity maps were observed. Decreased stratum corneum thickness was observed after waxing. Diffusion cell studies showed increased skin permeation especially in case of dry shaving, electric epilation and waxing. Conclusion: Considering CRS and diffusion cell data, a moderate if significant decrease in skin barrier function was found after hair removal by dry shaving (physical skin/material interaction) and epilation methods (plucking out the entire hair, for example, by electrical epilation and waxing). Subsequent experiments will include testing of different permeants covering a broad range of physicochemical properties in vitro and confirming our findings in vivo.
Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been systematically investigated. Thus, as a first step, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of hair removal through epilation (electric epilation, waxing) and depilation (dry and wet shaving, depilatory cream) on skin properties in vitro using the porcine ear model. Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, measurement of the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), visualization by capacitance-based contact imaging, confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), diffusion cell studies and tape stripping experiments were employed. Increased TEWL and altered skin permittivity maps were observed. Decreased stratum corneum thickness was observed after waxing. Diffusion cell studies showed increased skin permeation especially in case of dry shaving, electric epilation and waxing. Considering CRS and diffusion cell data, a moderate if significant decrease in skin barrier function was found after hair removal by dry shaving (physical skin/material interaction) and epilation methods (plucking out the entire hair, for example, by electrical epilation and waxing). Subsequent experiments will include testing of different permeants covering a broad range of physicochemical properties in vitro and confirming our findings in vivo.
Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been systematically investigated. Thus, as a first step, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of hair removal through epilation (electric epilation, waxing) and depilation (dry and wet shaving, depilatory cream) on skin properties in vitro using the porcine ear model.BACKGROUNDAlthough very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been systematically investigated. Thus, as a first step, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of hair removal through epilation (electric epilation, waxing) and depilation (dry and wet shaving, depilatory cream) on skin properties in vitro using the porcine ear model.Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, measurement of the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), visualization by capacitance-based contact imaging, confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), diffusion cell studies and tape stripping experiments were employed.METHODSAttenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, measurement of the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), visualization by capacitance-based contact imaging, confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), diffusion cell studies and tape stripping experiments were employed.Increased TEWL and altered skin permittivity maps were observed. Decreased stratum corneum thickness was observed after waxing. Diffusion cell studies showed increased skin permeation especially in case of dry shaving, electric epilation and waxing.RESULTSIncreased TEWL and altered skin permittivity maps were observed. Decreased stratum corneum thickness was observed after waxing. Diffusion cell studies showed increased skin permeation especially in case of dry shaving, electric epilation and waxing.Considering CRS and diffusion cell data, a moderate if significant decrease in skin barrier function was found after hair removal by dry shaving (physical skin/material interaction) and epilation methods (plucking out the entire hair, for example, by electrical epilation and waxing). Subsequent experiments will include testing of different permeants covering a broad range of physicochemical properties in vitro and confirming our findings in vivo.CONCLUSIONConsidering CRS and diffusion cell data, a moderate if significant decrease in skin barrier function was found after hair removal by dry shaving (physical skin/material interaction) and epilation methods (plucking out the entire hair, for example, by electrical epilation and waxing). Subsequent experiments will include testing of different permeants covering a broad range of physicochemical properties in vitro and confirming our findings in vivo.
Audience Academic
Author Brunner, Marion
Pany, Astrid
Klang, Victoria
Ruthofer, Johanna
Schwarz, Elisabeth
Valenta, Claudia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Astrid
  surname: Pany
  fullname: Pany, Astrid
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Victoria
  surname: Klang
  fullname: Klang, Victoria
  email: victoria.klang@univie.ac.at
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Marion
  surname: Brunner
  fullname: Brunner, Marion
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Johanna
  surname: Ruthofer
  fullname: Ruthofer, Johanna
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Elisabeth
  surname: Schwarz
  fullname: Schwarz, Elisabeth
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Claudia
  surname: Valenta
  fullname: Valenta, Claudia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkU9vEzEQxS1URP_AgTtClrjAIa29Xtu7vZWoJUitiCicV1573Jju2sF2KuUD8L1xSIgEinywZ_R7TzN-p-jIBw8IvabknFLeXhBC6pZR0TxDJ1QIMuGc8aP9u5LH6DSlH4RUQlLxAh0zwmpWNc0J-nVtLeiMg8XzxTo5rQasvMHTBYx_iplyEX-FMTyV4g7yIpiEg8f3j87jjypGBxHfrLzOrnRL78nlGC7xNPgEP1fgNSRsQ8QKz9YmhuXCDU7ju2BgwHOIIyifX6LnVg0JXu3uM_T95vrbdDa5_fLp8_TqdqJrIfOEa8ENcMsN00Tp3mpBK1ULYIzUfVsDkzXhLVESGql1a4uKt1LKti_79pSdofdb32UMZbaUu9ElDcOgPIRV6irKpZCE8aqg77bogxqgc96GHJXe4N2VFKJtOK1Zoc4PUOWYzfeVlKwr_X8Eb3cTrPoRTLeMblRx3f1NpAAftoCOIaUIdo9Q0m3S7vZpF_biP1a7rDZBlCnccFCx2-pRxQeIe-_7-XxLdEtjC_XmILUz-Q1Mfb4K
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2021_120308
crossref_primary_10_1159_000511038
crossref_primary_10_1111_pde_14060
crossref_primary_10_3390_cosmetics11030085
crossref_primary_10_1159_000514498
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2023_122930
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tiv_2022_105425
crossref_primary_10_1111_ics_12923
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpb_2024_114433
crossref_primary_10_1002_jbio_202000286
crossref_primary_10_1097_DER_0000000000000491
crossref_primary_10_1111_ddg_14993_g
crossref_primary_10_1111_exd_14645
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13104_020_05260_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2019_118477
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2024_124289
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdcr_2022_02_019
crossref_primary_10_1111_ddg_14993
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12050581
crossref_primary_10_1002_ame2_12304
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpharm_2019_118903
crossref_primary_10_1159_000503262
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.
COPYRIGHT 2018 S. Karger AG
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
– notice: 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 S. Karger AG
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1159/000493168
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1660-5535
EndPage 21
ExternalDocumentID A766985143
30343288
10_1159_000493168
493168
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Austria
Germany
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Austria
– name: Germany
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
0~5
0~B
123
1CY
30W
328
3O.
3V.
4.4
53G
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
AAYIC
ABJNI
ABPAZ
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACPSR
ADBBV
AENEX
AEYAO
AFJJK
AFKRA
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALDHI
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AZPMC
BENPR
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CYUIP
DU5
E0A
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
FB.
FYUFA
HMCUK
HZ~
IAO
IHR
IY7
KUZGX
M1P
O1H
O9-
P2P
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RKO
RXVBD
UJ6
UKHRP
AAYXX
ABBTS
ABWCG
AFFHD
AHFRZ
CITATION
ITC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-5c65de5f5d3c0acbfc612a46e3304b94e3740590a7e87cc9f467597779b343b13
ISICitedReferencesCount 22
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000454181500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1660-5527
1660-5535
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 16:46:07 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 14:15:34 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 10:51:12 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:58:31 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:59:13 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:57:22 EST 2025
Thu Aug 29 12:04:45 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 05 17:57:57 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Shaving
Skin barrier function
Damaged skin
Hair removal
Skin/material interaction
Language English
License Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses
2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c467t-5c65de5f5d3c0acbfc612a46e3304b94e3740590a7e87cc9f467597779b343b13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 30343288
PQID 2157670352
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs karger_primary_493168
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A766985143
gale_infotracmisc_A766985143
crossref_citationtrail_10_1159_000493168
crossref_primary_10_1159_000493168
pubmed_primary_30343288
proquest_miscellaneous_2157670352
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Basel, Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Basel, Switzerland
– name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Skin pharmacology and physiology
PublicationTitleAlternate Skin Pharmacol Physiol
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher S. Karger AG
Publisher_xml – name: S. Karger AG
References Turner GA, Moore AE, Marti VP, Paterson SE, James AG: Impact of shaving and anti-perspirant use on the axillary vault. Int J Cosmet Sci 2007; 29: 31–38.
Dey S, Rothe H, Page L, O’Connor R, Farahmand S, Toner F, et al: An in vitro skin penetration model for compromised skin: estimating penetration of polyethylene glycol [14C]-PEG-7 phosphate. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2015; 28: 12–21.
Kottner J, Ludriksone L, Garcia Bartels N, Blume-Peytavi U: Do repeated skin barrier measurements influence each other’s results? An explorative study. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 27: 90–96.
Toerien M, Wilkinson S, Choi PYL: Body hair removal: the “mundane” production of normative femininity. Sex Roles 2005; 52: 399–406.
Klang V, Schwarz JC, Lenobel B, Nadj M, Auböck J, Wolzt M, et al: In vitro vs. in vivo tape stripping: validation of the porcine ear model and penetration assessment of novel sucrose stearate emulsions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2012; 80: 604–614.
Boroughs M, Cafri G, Thompson JK: Male body depilation: prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles 2005; 52: 637–644.
Herkenne C, Naik A, Kalia YN, Hadgraft J, Guy RH: Pig ear skin ex vivo as a model for in vivo dermatopharmacokinetic studies in man. Pharm Res 2006; 23: 1850–1856.
Sekkat N, Kalia YN, Guy RH: Biophysical study of porcine ear skin in vitro and its comparison to human skin in vivo. J Pharm Sci 2002; 91: 2376–2381.
Tiggemann M, Hodgson S: The hairlessness norm extended: Reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites. Sex Roles 2008; 59: 889–897.
Hathout RM, Mansour S, Mortada ND, Geneidi AS, Guy RH: Uptake of microemulsion components into the stratum corneum and their molecular effects on skin barrier function. Mol Pharm 2010; 7: 1266–1273.
Heinrich K, Heinrich U, Tronnier H: Influence of different cosmetic formulations on the human skin barrier. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 27: 141–147.
Marti VP, Lee RS, Moore AE, Paterson SE, Watkinson A, Rawlings AV: Effect of shaving on axillary stratum corneum. Int J Cosmet Sci 2003; 25: 193–198.
Sekkat N, Kalia YN, Guy RH: Porcine ear skin as a model for the assessment of transdermal drug delivery to premature neonates. Pharm Res 2004; 21: 1390–1397.
Hamza M, Tohid H, Maibach H: Shaving effects on percutaneous penetration: clinical implications. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2015; 34: 335–343.
Klang V, Schwarz JC, Haberfeld S, Xiao P, Wirth M, Valenta C: Skin integrity testing and monitoring of in vitro tape stripping by capacitance-based sensor imaging. Ski Res Technol 2013; 19:e259–e272.
Czaika V, Alborova A, Richter H, Sterry W, Vergou T, Antoniou C, et al: Comparison of transepidermal water loss and laser scanning microscopy measurements to assess their value in the characterization of cutaneous barrier defects. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 39–46.
Yoshihara T, Shimada K, Momoi Y, Konno K, Iwasaki T: A new method of measuring the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) of dog skin. J Vet Med Sci 2007; 69: 289–292.
Klang V, Hoppel M, Valenta C: Infrared densitometry for in vitro tape stripping: quantification of porcine corneocytes; in Humbert P, Maibach H, Fanian F, Agache P (eds): Measuring the Skin. Cham, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015.
Klimisch HM, Chandra G: Use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance for in vivo quantitation of polydimethylsiloxanes on human skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1985; 37: 73–87.
Hoppel M, Baurecht D, Holper E, Mahrhauser D, Valenta C: Validation of the combined ATR-FTIR/tape stripping technique for monitoring the distribution of surfactants in the stratum corneum. Int J Pharm 2014; 472: 88–93.
Martins Y, Tiggemann M, Churchett L: Hair today, gone tomorrow: a comparison of body hair removal practices in gay and heterosexual men. Body Image 2008; 5: 312–316.
Mahrhauser DS, Nagelreiter C, Gehrig S, Geyer A, Ogris M, Kwizda K, et al: Assessment of Raman spectroscopy as a fast and non-invasive method for total stratum corneum thickness determination of pig skin. Int J Pharm 2015; 495: 482–484.
Nagelreiter C, Mahrhauser D, Wiatschka K, Skipiol S, Valenta C: Importance of a suitable working protocol for tape stripping experiments on porcine ear skin: Influence of lipophilic formulations and strip adhesion impairment. Int J Pharm 2015; 491: 162–169.
Binder L, SheikhRezaei S, Baierl A, Gruber L, Wolzt M, Valenta C: Confocal Raman spectroscopy: in vivo measurement of physiological skin parameters – a pilot study. J Dermatol Sci 2017; 88: 280–288.
Egawa M, Hirao T, Takahashi M: In vivo estimation of stratum corneum thickness from water concentration profiles obtained with raman spectroscopy. Acta Derm Venereol 2007; 87: 4–8.
Boncheva M, Damien F, Normand V: Molecular organization of the lipid matrix in intact Stratum corneum using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1778: 1344–1355.
Jacobi U, Kaiser M, Toll R, Mangelsdorf S, Audring H, Otberg N, et al: Porcine ear skin: an in vitro model for human skin. Ski Res Technol 2007; 13: 19–24.
Schwarz JC, Klang V, Hoppel M, Wolzt M, Valenta C: Corneocyte quantification by NIR densitometry and UV/Vis spectroscopy for human and porcine skin and the role of skin cleaning procedures. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 142–149.
Warner RR, Myers MC, Taylor DA: Electron probe analysis of human skin: determination of the water concentration profile. J Invest Dermatol 1988; 90: 218–224.
Lucová M, Hojerová J, Pažoureková S, Klimová Z: Absorption of triphenylmethane dyes Brilliant Blue and Patent Blue through intact skin, shaven skin and lingual mucosa from daily life products. Food Chem Toxicol 2013; 52: 19–27.
Hojerová J, Peráčková Z, Beránková M: Margin of safety for two UV filters estimated by in vitro permeation studies mimicking consumer habits: effects of skin shaving and sunscreen reapplication. Food Chem Toxicol 2017; 103: 66–78.
Franzen L, Windbergs M, Hansen S: Assessment of near-infrared densitometry for in situ determination of the total stratum corneum thickness on pig skin: influence of storage time. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 249–256.
Tiggemann M, Kenyon SJ: The hairlessness norm: the removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles 1998; 39: 873–885.
Förster M, Bolzinger MA, Rovere MR, Damour O, Montagnac G, Briançon S: Confocal raman microspectroscopy for evaluating the stratum corneum removal by 3 standard methods. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2011; 24: 103–112.
Fluhr JW, Feingold KR, Elias PM: Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barrier status: Validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models. Exp Dermatol 2006; 15: 483–492.
Hadgraft J: Skin, the final frontier. Int J Pharm 2001; 224: 1–18.
Klang V, Schwarz JC, Hartl A, Valenta C: Facilitating in vitro tape stripping: application of infrared densitometry for quantification of porcine stratum corneum proteins. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2011; 24: 256–268.
Chilcott RP, Dalton CH, Emmanuel AJ, Allen CE, Bradley ST: Transepidermal water loss does not correlate with skin barrier function in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 118: 871–875.
Hasanovic A, Winkler R, Resch GP, Valenta C: Modification of the conformational skin structure by treatment with liposomal formulations and its correlation to the penetration depth of aciclovir. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011; 79: 76–81.
References_xml – reference: Franzen L, Windbergs M, Hansen S: Assessment of near-infrared densitometry for in situ determination of the total stratum corneum thickness on pig skin: influence of storage time. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 249–256.
– reference: Turner GA, Moore AE, Marti VP, Paterson SE, James AG: Impact of shaving and anti-perspirant use on the axillary vault. Int J Cosmet Sci 2007; 29: 31–38.
– reference: Sekkat N, Kalia YN, Guy RH: Biophysical study of porcine ear skin in vitro and its comparison to human skin in vivo. J Pharm Sci 2002; 91: 2376–2381.
– reference: Warner RR, Myers MC, Taylor DA: Electron probe analysis of human skin: determination of the water concentration profile. J Invest Dermatol 1988; 90: 218–224.
– reference: Klang V, Schwarz JC, Haberfeld S, Xiao P, Wirth M, Valenta C: Skin integrity testing and monitoring of in vitro tape stripping by capacitance-based sensor imaging. Ski Res Technol 2013; 19:e259–e272.
– reference: Jacobi U, Kaiser M, Toll R, Mangelsdorf S, Audring H, Otberg N, et al: Porcine ear skin: an in vitro model for human skin. Ski Res Technol 2007; 13: 19–24.
– reference: Klang V, Schwarz JC, Hartl A, Valenta C: Facilitating in vitro tape stripping: application of infrared densitometry for quantification of porcine stratum corneum proteins. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2011; 24: 256–268.
– reference: Binder L, SheikhRezaei S, Baierl A, Gruber L, Wolzt M, Valenta C: Confocal Raman spectroscopy: in vivo measurement of physiological skin parameters – a pilot study. J Dermatol Sci 2017; 88: 280–288.
– reference: Heinrich K, Heinrich U, Tronnier H: Influence of different cosmetic formulations on the human skin barrier. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 27: 141–147.
– reference: Klang V, Hoppel M, Valenta C: Infrared densitometry for in vitro tape stripping: quantification of porcine corneocytes; in Humbert P, Maibach H, Fanian F, Agache P (eds): Measuring the Skin. Cham, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015.
– reference: Nagelreiter C, Mahrhauser D, Wiatschka K, Skipiol S, Valenta C: Importance of a suitable working protocol for tape stripping experiments on porcine ear skin: Influence of lipophilic formulations and strip adhesion impairment. Int J Pharm 2015; 491: 162–169.
– reference: Boncheva M, Damien F, Normand V: Molecular organization of the lipid matrix in intact Stratum corneum using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1778: 1344–1355.
– reference: Förster M, Bolzinger MA, Rovere MR, Damour O, Montagnac G, Briançon S: Confocal raman microspectroscopy for evaluating the stratum corneum removal by 3 standard methods. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2011; 24: 103–112.
– reference: Marti VP, Lee RS, Moore AE, Paterson SE, Watkinson A, Rawlings AV: Effect of shaving on axillary stratum corneum. Int J Cosmet Sci 2003; 25: 193–198.
– reference: Mahrhauser DS, Nagelreiter C, Gehrig S, Geyer A, Ogris M, Kwizda K, et al: Assessment of Raman spectroscopy as a fast and non-invasive method for total stratum corneum thickness determination of pig skin. Int J Pharm 2015; 495: 482–484.
– reference: Hamza M, Tohid H, Maibach H: Shaving effects on percutaneous penetration: clinical implications. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2015; 34: 335–343.
– reference: Hadgraft J: Skin, the final frontier. Int J Pharm 2001; 224: 1–18.
– reference: Kottner J, Ludriksone L, Garcia Bartels N, Blume-Peytavi U: Do repeated skin barrier measurements influence each other’s results? An explorative study. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 27: 90–96.
– reference: Toerien M, Wilkinson S, Choi PYL: Body hair removal: the “mundane” production of normative femininity. Sex Roles 2005; 52: 399–406.
– reference: Yoshihara T, Shimada K, Momoi Y, Konno K, Iwasaki T: A new method of measuring the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) of dog skin. J Vet Med Sci 2007; 69: 289–292.
– reference: Dey S, Rothe H, Page L, O’Connor R, Farahmand S, Toner F, et al: An in vitro skin penetration model for compromised skin: estimating penetration of polyethylene glycol [14C]-PEG-7 phosphate. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2015; 28: 12–21.
– reference: Tiggemann M, Kenyon SJ: The hairlessness norm: the removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles 1998; 39: 873–885.
– reference: Hathout RM, Mansour S, Mortada ND, Geneidi AS, Guy RH: Uptake of microemulsion components into the stratum corneum and their molecular effects on skin barrier function. Mol Pharm 2010; 7: 1266–1273.
– reference: Hasanovic A, Winkler R, Resch GP, Valenta C: Modification of the conformational skin structure by treatment with liposomal formulations and its correlation to the penetration depth of aciclovir. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011; 79: 76–81.
– reference: Herkenne C, Naik A, Kalia YN, Hadgraft J, Guy RH: Pig ear skin ex vivo as a model for in vivo dermatopharmacokinetic studies in man. Pharm Res 2006; 23: 1850–1856.
– reference: Chilcott RP, Dalton CH, Emmanuel AJ, Allen CE, Bradley ST: Transepidermal water loss does not correlate with skin barrier function in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 118: 871–875.
– reference: Hojerová J, Peráčková Z, Beránková M: Margin of safety for two UV filters estimated by in vitro permeation studies mimicking consumer habits: effects of skin shaving and sunscreen reapplication. Food Chem Toxicol 2017; 103: 66–78.
– reference: Tiggemann M, Hodgson S: The hairlessness norm extended: Reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites. Sex Roles 2008; 59: 889–897.
– reference: Sekkat N, Kalia YN, Guy RH: Porcine ear skin as a model for the assessment of transdermal drug delivery to premature neonates. Pharm Res 2004; 21: 1390–1397.
– reference: Hoppel M, Baurecht D, Holper E, Mahrhauser D, Valenta C: Validation of the combined ATR-FTIR/tape stripping technique for monitoring the distribution of surfactants in the stratum corneum. Int J Pharm 2014; 472: 88–93.
– reference: Martins Y, Tiggemann M, Churchett L: Hair today, gone tomorrow: a comparison of body hair removal practices in gay and heterosexual men. Body Image 2008; 5: 312–316.
– reference: Czaika V, Alborova A, Richter H, Sterry W, Vergou T, Antoniou C, et al: Comparison of transepidermal water loss and laser scanning microscopy measurements to assess their value in the characterization of cutaneous barrier defects. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 39–46.
– reference: Klang V, Schwarz JC, Lenobel B, Nadj M, Auböck J, Wolzt M, et al: In vitro vs. in vivo tape stripping: validation of the porcine ear model and penetration assessment of novel sucrose stearate emulsions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2012; 80: 604–614.
– reference: Boroughs M, Cafri G, Thompson JK: Male body depilation: prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles 2005; 52: 637–644.
– reference: Fluhr JW, Feingold KR, Elias PM: Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barrier status: Validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models. Exp Dermatol 2006; 15: 483–492.
– reference: Schwarz JC, Klang V, Hoppel M, Wolzt M, Valenta C: Corneocyte quantification by NIR densitometry and UV/Vis spectroscopy for human and porcine skin and the role of skin cleaning procedures. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 142–149.
– reference: Lucová M, Hojerová J, Pažoureková S, Klimová Z: Absorption of triphenylmethane dyes Brilliant Blue and Patent Blue through intact skin, shaven skin and lingual mucosa from daily life products. Food Chem Toxicol 2013; 52: 19–27.
– reference: Egawa M, Hirao T, Takahashi M: In vivo estimation of stratum corneum thickness from water concentration profiles obtained with raman spectroscopy. Acta Derm Venereol 2007; 87: 4–8.
– reference: Klimisch HM, Chandra G: Use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance for in vivo quantitation of polydimethylsiloxanes on human skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1985; 37: 73–87.
SSID ssj0026716
Score 2.318101
Snippet Background: Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not...
Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
karger
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 8
SubjectTerms Care and treatment
Depilatories
Hair
Health aspects
Infrared spectroscopy
Methods
Physiological aspects
Raman spectroscopy
Removal
Research Article
Skin
Skin care products
Title Effect of Physical and Chemical Hair Removal Methods on Skin Barrier Function in vitro: Consequences for a Hydrophilic Model Permeant
URI https://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000493168
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343288
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2157670352
Volume 32
WOSCitedRecordID wos000454181500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1660-5535
  dateEnd: 20231209
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0026716
  issn: 1660-5527
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20040101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1660-5535
  dateEnd: 20231209
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0026716
  issn: 1660-5527
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20040101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bi9NAFB66F5Z9ES-rVusyiqAgwbS5zIxvq-yyCFuKrtK3kEwSLLZJyLZl_QH-Mv-Y58ytqbqgD76EMpmeSed8PWfOybkQ8tyPeVnycuixKAMDhfm5J8JQeJKPSj8N8mHAMtVsgo3HfDoVk17vh82FWc9ZVfHra9H8V1bDGDAbU2f_gd2OKAzAZ2A6XIHtcP0rxpt6xBjbZnmAznFXGeA8nbWwq4t6rdJysYG0emWAbbjw9YNqYXcG6s6GQa5nyxafSjX3tJHXOvry1fm3vK0bdMpI1VZtjiH1iyKttlz-inSzKZKtaz4pp8qWV38CkkkJK2wmkjtdMDc-7c8zfMMw67gQVrZx2AWY_JuAAgzbr0t95339Ja10i3Dr3cCEKufd0AI5jn0Pq8RpfdUd02VOrBTfeEkdWrVI5h3drpOxf9cakdBhlqHAPl7dObC7zUIhBXR9GIw43yhOF86ov7ZD9kYsEiBa996ejicfnN0fM9WB1_0UU-AKVn3t1jwkB3aBrROSOSfsf8W8gPZmM0gdhy5vk1vGjqEnGn93SK-o7pKDCxOpcY981zCkdUktDCkwnVoYUoQhNTCkBoa0rihihRoYUgtDCmMKhm9oF4QUQEhT2gEhVSCkFoRH5NPZ6eW7c8-0_PAkaOylF8k4youojPJA-qnMSgkn8DSMC3S7ZSIsAhZiunTKCs6kFCV8CysoMpHB5mXD4D7ZreqqeEioP8qHMQuiIsiAAPBFAgHph4zBkBz5ffLSbnMiTT18bMsyT5RdHInEMadPnrmpjS4C86dJL5BXCaIG6MjU5LfA02CJteSExbHgaJ_0yWBrJgh0uXX7SHPbrWUXGPwy_nEy0beSJi_75KnFRoIUMXiyKurVVQKnehYzLHzcJw80aBwJC7pHNyz6mBxu_pYDsrtsV8UTsi_Xy9lVe0x22JSpKz82qP8JzErfow
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+Physical+and+Chemical+Hair+Removal+Methods+on+Skin+Barrier+Function+in+vitro%3A+Consequences+for+a+Hydrophilic+Model+Permeant&rft.jtitle=Skin+pharmacology+and+physiology&rft.au=Pany%2C+Astrid&rft.au=Klang%2C+Victoria&rft.au=Brunner%2C+Marion&rft.au=Ruthofer%2C+Johanna&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.issn=1660-5527&rft.eissn=1660-5535&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159%2F000493168&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F30343288&rft.externalDocID=493168
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1660-5527&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1660-5527&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1660-5527&client=summon