Enhancing a Somatic Maturity Prediction Model

Assessing biological maturity in studies of children is challenging. Sex-specific regression equations developed using anthropometric measures are widely used to predict somatic maturity. However, prediction accuracy was not established in external samples. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the fit of thes...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Medicine and science in sports and exercise Ročník 47; číslo 8; s. 1755
Hlavní autoři: Moore, Sarah A, McKay, Heather A, Macdonald, Heather, Nettlefold, Lindsay, Baxter-Jones, Adam D G, Cameron, Noël, Brasher, Penelope M A
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States 01.08.2015
Témata:
ISSN:1530-0315, 1530-0315
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Assessing biological maturity in studies of children is challenging. Sex-specific regression equations developed using anthropometric measures are widely used to predict somatic maturity. However, prediction accuracy was not established in external samples. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the fit of these equations, assess for overfitting (adjusting as necessary), and calibrate using external samples. We evaluated potential overfitting using the original Pediatric Bone Mineral Accrual Study (PBMAS; 79 boys and 72 girls; 7.5-17.5 yr). We assessed change in R and standard error of the estimate (SEE) with the addition of predictor variables. We determined the effect of within-subject correlation using cluster-robust variance and fivefold random splitting followed by forward-stepwise regression. We used dominant predictors from these splits to assess predictive abilities of various models. We calibrated using participants from the Healthy Bones Study III (HBS-III; 42 boys and 39 girls; 8.9-18.9 yr) and Harpenden Growth Study (HGS; 38 boys and 32 girls; 6.5-19.1 yr). Change in R and SEE was negligible when later predictors were added during step-by-step refitting of the original equations, suggesting overfitting. After redevelopment, new models included age × sitting height for boys (R, 0.91; SEE, 0.51) and age × height for girls (R, 0.90; SEE, 0.52). These models calibrated well in external samples; HBS boys: b0, 0.04 (0.05); b1, 0.98 (0.03); RMSE, 0.89; HBS girls: b0, 0.35 (0.04); b1, 1.01 (0.02); RMSE, 0.65; HGS boys: b0, -0.20 (0.02); b1, 1.02 (0.01); RMSE, 0.85; HGS girls: b0, -0.02 (0.03); b1, 0.97 (0.02); RMSE, 0.70; where b0 equals calibration intercept (standard error (SE)) and b1 equals calibration slope (SE), and RMSE equals root mean squared error (of prediction). We subsequently developed an age × height alternate for boys, allowing for predictions without sitting height. Our equations provided good fits in external samples and provide an alternative to commonly used models. Original prediction equations were simplified with no meaningful increase in estimation error.
AbstractList Assessing biological maturity in studies of children is challenging. Sex-specific regression equations developed using anthropometric measures are widely used to predict somatic maturity. However, prediction accuracy was not established in external samples. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the fit of these equations, assess for overfitting (adjusting as necessary), and calibrate using external samples.PURPOSEAssessing biological maturity in studies of children is challenging. Sex-specific regression equations developed using anthropometric measures are widely used to predict somatic maturity. However, prediction accuracy was not established in external samples. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the fit of these equations, assess for overfitting (adjusting as necessary), and calibrate using external samples.We evaluated potential overfitting using the original Pediatric Bone Mineral Accrual Study (PBMAS; 79 boys and 72 girls; 7.5-17.5 yr). We assessed change in R and standard error of the estimate (SEE) with the addition of predictor variables. We determined the effect of within-subject correlation using cluster-robust variance and fivefold random splitting followed by forward-stepwise regression. We used dominant predictors from these splits to assess predictive abilities of various models. We calibrated using participants from the Healthy Bones Study III (HBS-III; 42 boys and 39 girls; 8.9-18.9 yr) and Harpenden Growth Study (HGS; 38 boys and 32 girls; 6.5-19.1 yr).METHODSWe evaluated potential overfitting using the original Pediatric Bone Mineral Accrual Study (PBMAS; 79 boys and 72 girls; 7.5-17.5 yr). We assessed change in R and standard error of the estimate (SEE) with the addition of predictor variables. We determined the effect of within-subject correlation using cluster-robust variance and fivefold random splitting followed by forward-stepwise regression. We used dominant predictors from these splits to assess predictive abilities of various models. We calibrated using participants from the Healthy Bones Study III (HBS-III; 42 boys and 39 girls; 8.9-18.9 yr) and Harpenden Growth Study (HGS; 38 boys and 32 girls; 6.5-19.1 yr).Change in R and SEE was negligible when later predictors were added during step-by-step refitting of the original equations, suggesting overfitting. After redevelopment, new models included age × sitting height for boys (R, 0.91; SEE, 0.51) and age × height for girls (R, 0.90; SEE, 0.52). These models calibrated well in external samples; HBS boys: b0, 0.04 (0.05); b1, 0.98 (0.03); RMSE, 0.89; HBS girls: b0, 0.35 (0.04); b1, 1.01 (0.02); RMSE, 0.65; HGS boys: b0, -0.20 (0.02); b1, 1.02 (0.01); RMSE, 0.85; HGS girls: b0, -0.02 (0.03); b1, 0.97 (0.02); RMSE, 0.70; where b0 equals calibration intercept (standard error (SE)) and b1 equals calibration slope (SE), and RMSE equals root mean squared error (of prediction). We subsequently developed an age × height alternate for boys, allowing for predictions without sitting height.RESULTSChange in R and SEE was negligible when later predictors were added during step-by-step refitting of the original equations, suggesting overfitting. After redevelopment, new models included age × sitting height for boys (R, 0.91; SEE, 0.51) and age × height for girls (R, 0.90; SEE, 0.52). These models calibrated well in external samples; HBS boys: b0, 0.04 (0.05); b1, 0.98 (0.03); RMSE, 0.89; HBS girls: b0, 0.35 (0.04); b1, 1.01 (0.02); RMSE, 0.65; HGS boys: b0, -0.20 (0.02); b1, 1.02 (0.01); RMSE, 0.85; HGS girls: b0, -0.02 (0.03); b1, 0.97 (0.02); RMSE, 0.70; where b0 equals calibration intercept (standard error (SE)) and b1 equals calibration slope (SE), and RMSE equals root mean squared error (of prediction). We subsequently developed an age × height alternate for boys, allowing for predictions without sitting height.Our equations provided good fits in external samples and provide an alternative to commonly used models. Original prediction equations were simplified with no meaningful increase in estimation error.CONCLUSIONOur equations provided good fits in external samples and provide an alternative to commonly used models. Original prediction equations were simplified with no meaningful increase in estimation error.
Assessing biological maturity in studies of children is challenging. Sex-specific regression equations developed using anthropometric measures are widely used to predict somatic maturity. However, prediction accuracy was not established in external samples. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the fit of these equations, assess for overfitting (adjusting as necessary), and calibrate using external samples. We evaluated potential overfitting using the original Pediatric Bone Mineral Accrual Study (PBMAS; 79 boys and 72 girls; 7.5-17.5 yr). We assessed change in R and standard error of the estimate (SEE) with the addition of predictor variables. We determined the effect of within-subject correlation using cluster-robust variance and fivefold random splitting followed by forward-stepwise regression. We used dominant predictors from these splits to assess predictive abilities of various models. We calibrated using participants from the Healthy Bones Study III (HBS-III; 42 boys and 39 girls; 8.9-18.9 yr) and Harpenden Growth Study (HGS; 38 boys and 32 girls; 6.5-19.1 yr). Change in R and SEE was negligible when later predictors were added during step-by-step refitting of the original equations, suggesting overfitting. After redevelopment, new models included age × sitting height for boys (R, 0.91; SEE, 0.51) and age × height for girls (R, 0.90; SEE, 0.52). These models calibrated well in external samples; HBS boys: b0, 0.04 (0.05); b1, 0.98 (0.03); RMSE, 0.89; HBS girls: b0, 0.35 (0.04); b1, 1.01 (0.02); RMSE, 0.65; HGS boys: b0, -0.20 (0.02); b1, 1.02 (0.01); RMSE, 0.85; HGS girls: b0, -0.02 (0.03); b1, 0.97 (0.02); RMSE, 0.70; where b0 equals calibration intercept (standard error (SE)) and b1 equals calibration slope (SE), and RMSE equals root mean squared error (of prediction). We subsequently developed an age × height alternate for boys, allowing for predictions without sitting height. Our equations provided good fits in external samples and provide an alternative to commonly used models. Original prediction equations were simplified with no meaningful increase in estimation error.
Author Brasher, Penelope M A
Macdonald, Heather
Baxter-Jones, Adam D G
Cameron, Noël
Moore, Sarah A
McKay, Heather A
Nettlefold, Lindsay
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sarah A
  surname: Moore
  fullname: Moore, Sarah A
  organization: 1Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA; 2Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA; 3Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA; 4Child and Family Research Institute, BC Women's and Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA; 5College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CANADA; 6Centre for Global Health and Human Development, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UNITED KINGDOM; 7Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA; and 8Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Heather A
  surname: McKay
  fullname: McKay, Heather A
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Heather
  surname: Macdonald
  fullname: Macdonald, Heather
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Lindsay
  surname: Nettlefold
  fullname: Nettlefold, Lindsay
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Adam D G
  surname: Baxter-Jones
  fullname: Baxter-Jones, Adam D G
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Noël
  surname: Cameron
  fullname: Cameron, Noël
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Penelope M A
  surname: Brasher
  fullname: Brasher, Penelope M A
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25423445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNj0tLw0AYRQep2If-A5Es3aTOI5OZWUppVWhQiK7DN4_oSDKJmWTRf2_BCr2bcxeHC3eJZqELDqFbgteEZuqhKMs1Pg-X8gItCGc4xYzw2Vmfo2WM30dHMEau0JzyjLIs4wuUbsMXBOPDZwJJ2bUwepMUME6DHw_J2-CsN6PvQlJ01jXX6LKGJrqbE1foY7d93zyn-9enl83jPu2pYjI1XOTYAlaS58oosFpQYLwWWjCRc6e0zgGkocxIzi2rWea0BmmtNUQSQlfo_m-3H7qfycWxan00rmkguG6KFcmVoIRSKY_q3UmddOts1Q--heFQ_V-kv5lAVDw
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000588
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Physical Therapy
EISSN 1530-0315
ExternalDocumentID 25423445
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations British Columbia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: British Columbia
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  grantid: MOP-83391
– fundername: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  grantid: MOP-57671
– fundername: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  grantid: MOP-84575
– fundername: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  grantid: MOP-85582
GroupedDBID ---
-ET
-~X
.-D
.3C
.55
.GJ
.L3
.XZ
.Z2
01R
0R~
1CY
1J1
2FS
354
3EH
40H
41~
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5AM
5GY
5RE
5VS
6TJ
71W
77Y
7O~
85S
9V3
A9M
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAFWJ
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AAQQT
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AAUEB
AAWTL
AAXQO
AAYJJ
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABDPE
ABJNI
ABNJN
ABTAH
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABXYN
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACDOF
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIFK
ACIJW
ACILI
ACJBD
ACLDA
ACNCT
ACTHT
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACZKN
ADBIZ
ADEGP
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
ADNVM
ADUKH
AE3
AE6
AEBDS
AEETU
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFFDN
AFFNX
AFHKK
AFMBP
AFNMH
AFPHX
AFSOK
AFUWQ
AFYGQ
AGINI
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHQVU
AHRYX
AHVBC
AHWXW
AIDAL
AIJEX
AINUH
AJCLO
AJEOO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
ATPOU
BOYCO
BQLVK
BS7
BYPQX
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DU5
DUNZO
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FL-
FRP
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
H~9
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IYOWL
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
MMDCI
MPPUT
MVM
N4W
NEJ
NHB
NPM
N~6
N~7
N~B
N~M
O9-
OAG
OAH
OBZCC
OCUKA
ODA
ODMTH
OGKNY
OHH
OHT
OHYEH
OKBHI
OL1
OLG
OLH
OLL
OLU
OLV
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
OPX
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDLW
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P-K
P2P
QMB
QZG
R2J
R58
RLZ
S4R
S4S
SJN
T8P
TEORI
TN5
TSPGW
UAP
UKR
V2I
VJK
VVN
W3M
WF8
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
X7M
XJT
XOL
XXN
XYM
XZL
YCJ
YFH
YNT
YOC
YOJ
YQT
YR5
YYQ
ZB8
ZCA
ZCG
ZFV
ZGI
ZHY
ZKB
ZUP
ZXP
ZY4
ZZMQN
~02
7X8
ABPXF
ABUFD
ACBKD
ACTAD
ADKSD
ADSXY
ADXHL
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p2938-c5760da098569c9adb72a35f7b73765e9bb6aa8c23c855d3f34ebba8dddc18112
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 521
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000357942200025&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1530-0315
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 09:57:20 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:51:44 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p2938-c5760da098569c9adb72a35f7b73765e9bb6aa8c23c855d3f34ebba8dddc18112
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 25423445
PQID 1697212288
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1697212288
pubmed_primary_25423445
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-August
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-August
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Medicine and science in sports and exercise
PublicationTitleAlternate Med Sci Sports Exerc
PublicationYear 2015
SSID ssj0007331
Score 2.640235
Snippet Assessing biological maturity in studies of children is challenging. Sex-specific regression equations developed using anthropometric measures are widely used...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1755
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adolescent Development - physiology
Anthropometry - methods
British Columbia
Child
Child Development - physiology
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Models, Theoretical
Predictive Value of Tests
Young Adult
Title Enhancing a Somatic Maturity Prediction Model
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25423445
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1697212288
Volume 47
WOSCitedRecordID wos000357942200025&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NS8MwFH-oE_HidH7NLyJ4DWvTJk1OIrLhpaOwCbuNfFUFaeem_v0mbcYuHgR76C1QXt7H7yWvvx_Anau5qdScuUCSJU4VsZiTmGEeS1ZG0lgiZCM2kY3HfDYTRThwW4WxynVObBK1qbU_Ix_EzPPMEML5_eIDe9Uof7saJDS2oZM4KONHurLZhi086BG6oI6wVzMIv865jmOQTyYtdeH6oUF75VeQ2RSbUfe_n3kIBwFmoofWL45gy1Y92MvDRXoPukXYHzRtaQWOAQ-rV0--Ub0giSZ1Q-WKcs_76YA6KpZ-rd9F5OXT3k_geTScPj7hIKaAF66ic6xdYxEZGQlOmdBCGpURmdAyU5nLMdQKpZiUXJNEc0pNUiapVUpyY4x2KCAmp7BT1ZU9B0RFbDNriTOZSZXWynJFdCxkoliqmOjD7do2c-es_gZCVrb-Ws031unDWWvg-aJl1Zi7TpUkaUov_rD6EvYdcKHtIN4VdEoXqvYadvX359tqedN4gXuPi_wHixC6Qw
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing+a+Somatic+Maturity+Prediction+Model&rft.jtitle=Medicine+and+science+in+sports+and+exercise&rft.au=Moore%2C+Sarah+A&rft.au=McKay%2C+Heather+A&rft.au=Macdonald%2C+Heather&rft.au=Nettlefold%2C+Lindsay&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249%2FMSS.0000000000000588&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25423445&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25423445&rft.externalDocID=25423445
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1530-0315&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1530-0315&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1530-0315&client=summon