The Chicago Obsession in the Interpretation of US Antitrust History

Discussions about the evolution of the US antitrust system since the early 1970s often dwell upon the influence of the Chicago School in shaping substantive rules and enforcement policy. Many commentators attribute to Chicago School scholars-most notably, Judge Robert Bork-the decisive role in gaini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The University of Chicago law review Jg. 87; H. 2; S. 459 - 494
1. Verfasser: Kovacic, William E.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Chicago University of Chicago Law Review 01.03.2020
University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review
Schlagworte:
American history
Antitrust
Antitrust law
Antitrust laws
Consolidation and merger of corporations
Government policy
Interpretation and construction
Law
Schools
Symposium: Reassessing the Chicago School of Antitrust Law
U.S. states
UNITED STATES
Illinois
United States > US
ISSN:0041-9494, 1939-859X
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Discussions about the evolution of the US antitrust system since the early 1970s often dwell upon the influence of the Chicago School in shaping substantive rules and enforcement policy. Many commentators attribute to Chicago School scholars-most notably, Judge Robert Bork-the decisive role in gaining broad acceptance for permissive standards governing mergers, vertical restraints, and dominant firm behavior. In numerous treatments, the Chicago School is seen to be the intellectual foundation for US antitrust policy, including its acceptance of a "consumer welfare" standard that is said to focus exclusively on efficiency considerations to the exclusion of other policy objectives.
Bibliographie:Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, Mar 2020, 459-494
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0041-9494
1939-859X