The Chicago Obsession in the Interpretation of US Antitrust History

Discussions about the evolution of the US antitrust system since the early 1970s often dwell upon the influence of the Chicago School in shaping substantive rules and enforcement policy. Many commentators attribute to Chicago School scholars-most notably, Judge Robert Bork-the decisive role in gaini...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:The University of Chicago law review Ročník 87; číslo 2; s. 459 - 494
Hlavný autor: Kovacic, William E.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Chicago University of Chicago Law Review 01.03.2020
University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review
Predmet:
ISSN:0041-9494, 1939-859X
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Discussions about the evolution of the US antitrust system since the early 1970s often dwell upon the influence of the Chicago School in shaping substantive rules and enforcement policy. Many commentators attribute to Chicago School scholars-most notably, Judge Robert Bork-the decisive role in gaining broad acceptance for permissive standards governing mergers, vertical restraints, and dominant firm behavior. In numerous treatments, the Chicago School is seen to be the intellectual foundation for US antitrust policy, including its acceptance of a "consumer welfare" standard that is said to focus exclusively on efficiency considerations to the exclusion of other policy objectives.
Bibliografia:Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, Mar 2020, 459-494
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0041-9494
1939-859X