A Novel Unsupervised Autoencoder-Based HFOs Detector in Intracranial EEG Signals

High frequency oscillations (HFOs) have demonstrated their potency acting as an effective biomarker in epilepsy. However, most of the existing HFOs detectors are based on manual feature extraction and supervised learning, which incur laborious feature selection and time-consuming labeling process. I...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Proceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (1998) s. 1426 - 1430
Hlavní autori: Li, Weilai, Zhong, Lanfeng, Xiang, Weixi, Kang, Tongzhou, Lai, Dakun
Médium: Konferenčný príspevok..
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: IEEE 23.05.2022
Predmet:
Continuous wavelet transforms
convolutional variational autoencoder
Detectors
Hafnium oxide
High frequency oscillation
Sensitivity
Signal processing algorithms
Supervised learning
Time-frequency analysis
unsupervised detector
ISSN:2379-190X
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:High frequency oscillations (HFOs) have demonstrated their potency acting as an effective biomarker in epilepsy. However, most of the existing HFOs detectors are based on manual feature extraction and supervised learning, which incur laborious feature selection and time-consuming labeling process. In order to tackle these issues, we propose an automatic unsupervised HFOs detector based on convolutional variational autoencoder (CVAE). First, each selected HFO candidate (via an initial detection method) is converted into a 2-D time-frequency map (TFM) using continuous wavelet transform (CWT). Then, CVAE is trained on the red channel of the TFM (R-TFM) dataset so as to achieve the goal of dimensionality reduction and reconstruction of input feature. The reconstructed R-TFM dataset is later classified by K-means algorithm. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms four existing detectors, and achieve 92.85% in accuracy, 93.91% in sensitivity, and 92.14% in specificity.
ISSN:2379-190X
DOI:10.1109/ICASSP43922.2022.9746014