Comparing human and algorithmic anomaly detection for HVAC systems applications

This paper reports the first results of a comparison of human and algorithmic anomaly detection. We are interested in how human and automated anomaly detection can be combined in the most beneficial way to improve how fault detection is practiced in building maintenance. Open source datasets with se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:2022 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService) S. 155 - 160
Hauptverfasser: Borrison, Reuben, Syndicus, Marc, Orth, Andre, Markovic, Romana, Dix, Marcel, Liguori, Antonio, Berning, Matthias, Wagner, Andreas, Van Treeck, Christoph
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: IEEE 01.08.2022
Schlagworte:
Annotation
Anomaly detection
Buildings
Fault detection
HVAC
Maintenance engineering
Measurement
Neural networks
Predictive fault detection and diagnosis
Predictive maintenance
Time series analysis
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper reports the first results of a comparison of human and algorithmic anomaly detection. We are interested in how human and automated anomaly detection can be combined in the most beneficial way to improve how fault detection is practiced in building maintenance. Open source datasets with sensor data were annotated by persons with low subject matter experience, and compared with a Convolutional Autoencoder Neural Network (CAE) as well as a dedicated time series algorithm (DeepAnT), and detection metrics of human and algorithmic procedures are compared. Future comparisons will include higher levels of expertise on the human side, and more sophistication/training amount on the algorithm side. We close by discussing the advantages and caveats of our approach.
DOI:10.1109/BigDataService55688.2022.00032