Assessment of genetic algorithm selection, crossover and mutation techniques in power loss optimization for a hydrocarbon facility

In this paper, different selection, crossover including deferential evolution and mutation techniques are considered for optimizing the electrical power loss in real hydrocarbon industrial plant using genetic algorithm (GA). The subject plant electrical system consists of 275 buses, two gas turbine...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:2015 50th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC) s. 1 - 6
Hlavní autoři: Al-Hajri, Muhammad Tami, Abido, M. A., Darwish, M. K.
Médium: Konferenční příspěvek
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: IEEE 01.09.2015
Témata:
Biological cells
British thermal unit (BTU)
electrical submersible pump
Generators
genetic algorithm
Genetic algorithms
hydrocarbon facility
millions of standard cubical feet of gas (MMscf)
Optimization
power loss optimization
Sociology
Statistics
Synchronous motors
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In this paper, different selection, crossover including deferential evolution and mutation techniques are considered for optimizing the electrical power loss in real hydrocarbon industrial plant using genetic algorithm (GA). The subject plant electrical system consists of 275 buses, two gas turbine generators, two steam turbine generators, large synchronous motors, and other rotational and static loads. The minimization of power losses objective is used to guide the optimization process. Eight GA selection, crossover and mutation techniques combination cases are simulated for optimizing the system real power loss. The potential of power loss optimization for each case versus the base case will be discussed in the results. The results obtained demonstrate the potential and effectiveness of the proposed techniques combination cases in optimizing the power consumption. Also, in this paper a cost appraisal for the potential daily, monthly and annual cost saving associated with the power loss optimization for each case will be addressed.
DOI:10.1109/UPEC.2015.7339894