Handedness, Earnings, Ability and Personality. Evidence from the Lab
Evidence showing that on average left-handed (L), who are 10% in a population, tend to earn less than others is solely based on survey data. This paper is the first to test the relationship between handedness and earnings experimentally and also to assess whether the mechanism underlying it is predo...
Saved in:
| Published in: | PloS one Vol. 11; no. 10; p. e0164412 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Public Library of Science
27.10.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203, 1932-6203 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Evidence showing that on average left-handed (L), who are 10% in a population, tend to earn less than others is solely based on survey data. This paper is the first to test the relationship between handedness and earnings experimentally and also to assess whether the mechanism underlying it is predominantly cognitive or psychological. Data on 432 undergraduate students show that L do not obtain significantly different payoffs, a proxy for earnings, in a stylised labour market with multiple principals and agents. Similarly, scores in the Cognitive Reflection Test are not significantly different. Data on personality, measured using the Big Five test, show, instead, that L are significantly more agreeable and L females more extroverted. In addition, earnings significantly vary with personality only for L, increasing with extraversion and decreasing with neuroticism. Overall, our results fail to reject the null hypothesis that earnings do not differ by handedness and suggest differences in personality as a novel mechanism to rationalise L's behaviour. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist. Conceptualization: MS. Data curation: MS. Formal analysis: MS. Funding acquisition: MS. Investigation: MS. Methodology: MS. Project administration: MS. Resources: MS. Software: MS. Supervision: MS. Validation: MS. Visualization: MS. Writing – original draft: MS. Writing – review & editing: MS. |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0164412 |