Cognitive Processing Therapy or Relapse Prevention for comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder: A randomized clinical trial

To compare a Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) treatment (Cognitive Processing Therapy; CPT), an Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) treatment (Relapse Prevention; RP), and assessment-only (AO) for those meeting diagnostic criteria for both PTSD and AUD. Participants with current PTSD/AUD (N = 101; mean a...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:PloS one Ročník 17; číslo 11; s. e0276111
Hlavní autoři: Simpson, Tracy L., Kaysen, Debra L., Fleming, Charles B., Rhew, Isaac C., Jaffe, Anna E., Desai, Sruti, Hien, Denise A., Berliner, Lucy, Donovan, Dennis, Resick, Patricia A.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States Public Library of Science 29.11.2022
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Témata:
ISSN:1932-6203, 1932-6203
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:To compare a Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) treatment (Cognitive Processing Therapy; CPT), an Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) treatment (Relapse Prevention; RP), and assessment-only (AO) for those meeting diagnostic criteria for both PTSD and AUD. Participants with current PTSD/AUD (N = 101; mean age = 42.10; 56% female) were initially randomized to CPT, RP, or AO and assessed post-treatment or 6-weeks post-randomization (AO). AO participants were then re-randomized to CPT or RP. Follow-ups were at immediate post-treatment, 3-, and 12-months. Mixed effects intent-to-treat models compared conditions on changes in PTSD symptom severity, drinking days, and heavy drinking days. At post-treatment, participants assigned to CPT showed significantly greater improvement than those in AO on PTSD symptom severity (b = -9.72, 95% CI [-16.20, -3.23], d = 1.22); the RP and AO groups did not differ significantly on PTSD. Both active treatment conditions significantly decreased heavy drinking days relative to AO (CPT vs. AO: Count Ratio [CR] = 0.51, 95% CI [0.30, 0.88]; RP vs. AO: CR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.19, 0.59]). After re-randomization both treatment conditions showed substantial improvements in PTSD symptoms and drinking between pre-treatment and post-treatment over the 12-month follow-up period, with RP showing an advantage on heavy drinking days. Treatments targeting one or the other aspects of the PTSD/AUD comorbidity may have salutary effects on both PTSD and drinking outcomes. These preliminary results suggest that people with this comorbidity may have viable treatment options whether they present for mental health or addiction care. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01663337).
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
TLS and DLK are Joint First authors to this work.
Competing Interests: Dr. Kaysen is a co-author of a book on Cognitive Processing Therapy published by Elsevier for which she receives royalties. In addition she has conducted clinical workshops on Cognitive Processing Therapy for which she has received speakers fees, which could constitute a conflict of interest. Dr. Resick is a co-author on the Cognitive Processing Therapy treatment manual for which she receives royalties and she conducts clinical workshops on Cognitive Processing Therapy for which she receives speakers’ fees, which could constitute a conflict of interest. The other co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare pertinent to this submission. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276111