Research Priorities in Spiritual Care: An International Survey of Palliative Care Researchers and Clinicians

Spiritual distress, including meaninglessness and hopelessness, is common in advanced disease. Spiritual care is a core component of palliative care, yet often neglected by health care professionals owing to the dearth of robust evidence to guide practice. To determine research priorities of clinici...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of pain and symptom management Ročník 48; číslo 4; s. 518 - 531
Hlavní autoři: Selman, Lucy, Young, Teresa, Vermandere, Mieke, Stirling, Ian, Leget, Carlo
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.10.2014
Elsevier
Témata:
ISSN:0885-3924, 1873-6513, 1873-6513
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Spiritual distress, including meaninglessness and hopelessness, is common in advanced disease. Spiritual care is a core component of palliative care, yet often neglected by health care professionals owing to the dearth of robust evidence to guide practice. To determine research priorities of clinicians/researchers and thus inform future research in spiritual care in palliative care. An online, cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey was conducted. Respondents were asked whether there is a need for more research in spiritual care, and if so, to select the five most important research priorities from a list of 15 topics. Free-text questions were asked about additional research priorities and respondents' single most important research question, with data analyzed thematically. In total, 971 responses, including 293 from palliative care physicians, 112 from nurses, and 111 from chaplains, were received from 87 countries. Mean age was 48.5 years (standard deviation, 10.7), 64% were women, and 65% were Christian. Fifty-three percent reported their work as “mainly clinical,” and less than 2.5% stated that no further research was needed. Integrating quantitative and qualitative data demonstrated three priority areas for research: 1) development and evaluation of conversation models and overcoming barriers to spiritual care in staff attitudes, 2) screening and assessment, and 3) development and evaluation of spiritual care interventions and determining the effectiveness of spiritual care. In this first international survey exploring researchers' and clinicians' research priorities in spiritual care, we found international support for research in this domain. Findings provide an evidence base to direct future research and highlight the particular need for methodologically rigorous evaluation studies.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-3924
1873-6513
1873-6513
DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.10.020