Genomic subtyping and therapeutic targeting of acute erythroleukemia
Acute erythroid leukemia (AEL) is a high-risk leukemia of poorly understood genetic basis, with controversy regarding diagnosis in the spectrum of myelodysplasia and myeloid leukemia. We compared genomic features of 159 childhood and adult AEL cases with non-AEL myeloid disorders and defined five ag...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Nature genetics Ročník 51; číslo 4; s. 694 - 704 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.04.2019
Nature Publishing Group |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1061-4036, 1546-1718, 1546-1718 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | Acute erythroid leukemia (AEL) is a high-risk leukemia of poorly understood genetic basis, with controversy regarding diagnosis in the spectrum of myelodysplasia and myeloid leukemia. We compared genomic features of 159 childhood and adult AEL cases with non-AEL myeloid disorders and defined five age-related subgroups with distinct transcriptional profiles: adult,
TP53
mutated;
NPM1
mutated;
KMT2A
mutated/rearranged; adult,
DDX41
mutated; and pediatric,
NUP98
rearranged. Genomic features influenced outcome, with
NPM1
mutations and
HOXB9
overexpression being associated with a favorable prognosis and
TP53
,
FLT3
or
RB1
alterations associated with poor survival. Targetable signaling mutations were present in 45% of cases and included recurrent mutations of
ALK
and
NTRK1
, the latter of which drives erythroid leukemogenesis sensitive to TRK inhibition. This genomic landscape of AEL provides the framework for accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of this disease, and the rationale for testing targeted therapies in this high-risk leukemia.
Analysis of genomic and clinical features of acute erythroid leukemia in comparison to other myeloid disorders supports its distinct classification, defines subgroups and suggests therapeutic vulnerabilities. |
|---|---|
| Bibliografie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 K.E.M., S.M.M., T.B.A., D.P.T., M.V., V.V. performed experiments. G.S. analyzed copy number data. E.J.E. performed structure modeling. M.M, C.C, D.T., N.K., G.B., F.L., S.K.K.Y., A.Y.E.J., R.E.R., E.S., A.W., L.B.T., I.D.L., R.D.A., B.T.K., A.L.B., H.S., C.H., P.M., S.M., T.H. provided patient samples and clinical data. R.C.L., B.L.E. shared data for the MDS comparison cohort. Y.L., C.Q., X.M., X.Z., E.S., S.P.H, M.R. performed genomic sequencing, analysis, and support. L.S., S.P., D.P., C.C. performed statistical analyses. C.G.M. designed and oversaw the study, analyzed genomic data and wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS I.I. led the collaboration, coordination and processing of patient samples, analyzed genomic data, performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. J.W. analyzed sequencing data. J.K.C. performed central review of immunophenotypic data. L.J.J. performed histopathology analyses |
| ISSN: | 1061-4036 1546-1718 1546-1718 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41588-019-0375-1 |