Validation of IMU against optical reference and development of open-source pipeline: proof of concept case report in a participant with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant
Background Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 128 - 13 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
London
BioMed Central
31.07.2024
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1743-0003, 1743-0003 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Background
Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree.
Results
Average RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35° (IQR = 1.45°) and 3.59° (IQR = 2.00°) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26° (IQR = 1.08°). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66° to 3.82° and from 1.21° to 5.46° in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17° (coronal) to 3.91° (sagittal) and from 1.96° (transverse) to 2.32° (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in ‘excellent’ similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant.
Conclusions
We offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background : Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree. Results : Average RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35° (IQR = 1.45°) and 3.59° (IQR = 2.00°) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26° (IQR = 1.08°). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66° to 3.82° and from 1.21° to 5.46° in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17° (coronal) to 3.91° (sagittal) and from 1.96° (transverse) to 2.32° (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in ‘excellent’ similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant. Conclusions : We offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis. Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree.BACKGROUNDSystems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree.Average RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35° (IQR = 1.45°) and 3.59° (IQR = 2.00°) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26° (IQR = 1.08°). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66° to 3.82° and from 1.21° to 5.46° in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17° (coronal) to 3.91° (sagittal) and from 1.96° (transverse) to 2.32° (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in 'excellent' similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant.RESULTSAverage RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35° (IQR = 1.45°) and 3.59° (IQR = 2.00°) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26° (IQR = 1.08°). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66° to 3.82° and from 1.21° to 5.46° in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17° (coronal) to 3.91° (sagittal) and from 1.96° (transverse) to 2.32° (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in 'excellent' similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant.We offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis.CONCLUSIONSWe offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis. Background Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree. Results Average RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35[degrees] (IQR = 1.45[degrees]) and 3.59[degrees] (IQR = 2.00[degrees]) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26[degrees] (IQR = 1.08[degrees]). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66[degrees] to 3.82[degrees] and from 1.21[degrees] to 5.46[degrees] in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17[degrees] (coronal) to 3.91[degrees] (sagittal) and from 1.96[degrees] (transverse) to 2.32[degrees] (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in 'excellent' similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant. Conclusions We offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis. Keywords: Gait analysis, Motion analysis, Prosthetic gait, Osseointegration, Transfemoral amputation gait, IMU motion capture, Inertial measurement unit, Joint kinematics, Motion capture validation, Orientation estimation algorithm Abstract Background Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree. Results Average RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35° (IQR = 1.45°) and 3.59° (IQR = 2.00°) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26° (IQR = 1.08°). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66° to 3.82° and from 1.21° to 5.46° in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17° (coronal) to 3.91° (sagittal) and from 1.96° (transverse) to 2.32° (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in ‘excellent’ similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant. Conclusions We offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis. Background Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree. Results Average RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35° (IQR = 1.45°) and 3.59° (IQR = 2.00°) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26° (IQR = 1.08°). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66° to 3.82° and from 1.21° to 5.46° in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17° (coronal) to 3.91° (sagittal) and from 1.96° (transverse) to 2.32° (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in ‘excellent’ similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant. Conclusions We offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis. Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree. Average RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35° (IQR = 1.45°) and 3.59° (IQR = 2.00°) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26° (IQR = 1.08°). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66° to 3.82° and from 1.21° to 5.46° in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17° (coronal) to 3.91° (sagittal) and from 1.96° (transverse) to 2.32° (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in 'excellent' similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant. We offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis. Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) can progress our understanding of "real" human movement. IMU data must be validated in each application to interpret with clinical applicability; this is particularly true for diverse populations. Our IMU analysis method builds on the OpenSim IMU Inverse Kinematics toolkit integrating the Versatile Quaternion-based Filter and incorporates realistic constraints to the underlying biomechanical model. We validate our processing method against the reference standard optical motion capture in a case report with participants with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant (POI) and without amputation walking over level ground. We hypothesis that by using this novel pipeline, we can validate IMU motion capture data, to a clinically acceptable degree. Average RMSE (across all joints) between the two systems from the participant with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) on the amputated and the intact sides were 2.35[degrees] (IQR = 1.45[degrees]) and 3.59[degrees] (IQR = 2.00[degrees]) respectively. Equivalent results in the non-amputated participant were 2.26[degrees] (IQR = 1.08[degrees]). Joint level average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 1.66[degrees] to 3.82[degrees] and from 1.21[degrees] to 5.46[degrees] in the non-amputated participant. In plane average RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 2.17[degrees] (coronal) to 3.91[degrees] (sagittal) and from 1.96[degrees] (transverse) to 2.32[degrees] (sagittal) in the non-amputated participant. Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) results between the two systems in the TFA ranged from 0.74 to > 0.99 and from 0.72 to > 0.99 in the non-amputated participant and resulted in 'excellent' similarity in each data set average, in every plane and at all joint levels. Normalized RMSE between the two systems from the TFA ranged from 3.40% (knee level) to 54.54% (pelvis level) and from 2.18% to 36.01% in the non-amputated participant. We offer a modular processing pipeline that enables the addition of extra layers, facilitates changes to the underlying biomechanical model, and can accept raw IMU data from any vendor. We successfully validate the pipeline using data, for the first time, from a TFA participant using a POI and have proved our hypothesis. |
| ArticleNumber | 128 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Taheri, Shayan Weygers, Ive Ahmed, Kirstin Ortiz-Catalan, Max |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kirstin surname: Ahmed fullname: Ahmed, Kirstin email: kirstin@chalmers.se organization: Chalmers University – sequence: 2 givenname: Shayan surname: Taheri fullname: Taheri, Shayan organization: Chalmers University, Aalto University – sequence: 3 givenname: Ive surname: Weygers fullname: Weygers, Ive organization: University of Erlangen – sequence: 4 givenname: Max surname: Ortiz-Catalan fullname: Ortiz-Catalan, Max organization: Prometei Pain Rehabilitation Center |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39085954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://research.chalmers.se/publication/539796$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index (Chalmers tekniska högskola) |
| BookMark | eNp9k11rFDEUhgep2A_9A15IwBtvtiaZTCbxRkrxY6FSweptyGZOtikzyZjMtvg3_UWe7dTSFSlDmJDznic5yXsOq72YIlTVS0aPGVPybWFcK7GgHAcTXC7kk-qAtaJeUErrvQfz_eqwlCucCNqIZ9V-ralqdCMOqt8_bB86O4UUSfJk-eU7sWsbYplIGqfgbE8yeMgQHRAbO9LBNfRpHCBO24Q0QlyUtMkYHsMIfYjwjow5bWOeuIR540ScLYCgMeWJhEgsGW1GehgtYm7CdEmmbGPxMKSMW9ph3EzzoXyYJuhmjSVfITuMREibQs5LgRTiBOtst5rlMPbIe1499bYv8OLuf1RdfPxwcfp5cXb-aXl6crZwspHTwkHLV4wzL4S3K9XqTvtOc8dkq6hvai5B1JR6zoCqlVvxhqqOc_CKOe-gPqqWM7ZL9sqMOQw2_zLJBnO7kPLa3NbYg2lER7nsrOpaKoTQuhVCct54phzVkiHr28wqNzBuVju0DAVsdpfGXdp-gFxMAeME9zVj3PjacSNqr4yyjBqmHW-1ltq2DqnvZyoiB-gcPhle7g58NxLDpVmna4NgTamUSHhzR8jp5wbKZIZQHPT9_AKmpkrqBi-mRunrWbq2WHGIPiHSbeXmRKHxWCPVttDj_6jw62AIaBbwAdd3El49rOH-8H8djAI-C1xOpaBX7yXb68A2MXObGGwTc9smZluX-ifJhdlveJzQP55a3z0V7hPXkM0Vuj-i0R7L-gMvbCqJ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_025_05993_8 crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2025_3565835 crossref_primary_10_3390_s25165123 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.029 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.002 10.2522/ptj.20090125 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.014 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000506 10.1298/jjpta.6.9 10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.013 10.1007/s13534-018-0072-5 10.3390/s19235143 10.1186/s40798-018-0139-y 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00037 10.1186/s12984-022-01001-x 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002329 10.1371/journal.pone.0281339 10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.006 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.001 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.12.007 10.1179/1743288X11Y.0000000006 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.016 10.1109/10.102791 10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00047-8 10.3390/s19112474 10.3109/17453674.2011.570675 10.1115/1.4024473 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.008 10.3390/s22072544 10.3390/s140406891 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.020 10.3390/s19010038 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105976 10.1088/0967-3334/34/8/N63 10.1186/s12984-021-00816-4 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.003 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.05.002 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.009 10.3390/s20010130 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105988 10.3390/s23031738 10.1109/TBME.2021.3103201 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.013 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.005 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2024 2024. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2024 – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ABBSD ADTPV AOWAS D8T F1S ZZAVC DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-024-01426-6 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SWEPUB Chalmers tekniska högskola full text SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Freely available online SWEPUB Chalmers tekniska högskola SwePub Articles full text DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Engineering Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation Physical Therapy |
| EISSN | 1743-0003 |
| EndPage | 13 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_54d026da8d70444997446225f18c0961 oai_research_chalmers_se_c42f3112_f3c2_43f8_8a10_19c279969a7c PMC11290066 A803415681 39085954 10_1186_s12984_024_01426_6 |
| Genre | Validation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Case Reports |
| GeographicLocations | Sweden |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Sweden |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Chalmers University of Technology – fundername: Stiftelsen Promobilia funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009389 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29L 2QV 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 7RV 7X7 88E 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE I-F IAO IHR INH INR IPY ITC KQ8 L6V LK8 M0T M1P M48 M7P M7S ML0 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW XSB ~8M AAYXX AFFHD CITATION ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM 2VQ 4.4 ABBSD ADTPV AHSBF AOWAS D8T EJD F1S H13 IPNFZ RIG ZZAVC |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-ce72b121f44fab879d9fd92c16780f5326e4300f21e08bcb2508d22ef81cfce3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 5 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001282233300002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1743-0003 |
| IngestDate | Mon Nov 10 04:34:46 EST 2025 Wed Nov 05 04:10:11 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:06:08 EST 2025 Thu Sep 04 18:00:09 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 13:58:18 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 10:35:32 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:50:19 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:36:25 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:52:00 EST 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:18:50 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Prosthetic gait Osseointegration Motion capture validation IMU motion capture Transfemoral amputation gait Joint kinematics Inertial measurement unit Orientation estimation algorithm Motion analysis Gait analysis |
| Language | English |
| License | 2024. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c656t-ce72b121f44fab879d9fd92c16780f5326e4300f21e08bcb2508d22ef81cfce3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Case Study-4 ObjectType-Undefined-5 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Report-3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/54d026da8d70444997446225f18c0961 |
| PMID | 39085954 |
| PQID | 3086955083 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 13 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54d026da8d70444997446225f18c0961 swepub_primary_oai_research_chalmers_se_c42f3112_f3c2_43f8_8a10_19c279969a7c pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11290066 proquest_miscellaneous_3086955083 gale_infotracmisc_A803415681 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A803415681 pubmed_primary_39085954 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_024_01426_6 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12984_024_01426_6 springer_journals_10_1186_s12984_024_01426_6 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-07-31 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-07-31 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2024 text: 2024-07-31 day: 31 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | J NeuroEngineering Rehabil |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neuroeng Rehabil |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | SD Uhlrich (1426_CR4) 2022; 98 SL Delp (1426_CR29) 1990; 37 K Berner (1426_CR45) 2020; 24 S Cordillet (1426_CR34) 2019; 19 B Carse (1426_CR44) 2020; 75 J-T Zhang (1426_CR7) 2013; 34 1426_CR27 W Teufl (1426_CR40) 2019; 19 T Seel (1426_CR10) 2014; 14 S Sharif Bidabadi (1426_CR39) 2018; 8 BJ Darter (1426_CR15) 2023; 18 LM Schutte (1426_CR22) 2000; 11 H Kainz (1426_CR37) 2015; 30 AG Cutti (1426_CR3) 2015; 37 1426_CR42 D Laidig (1426_CR19) 2023; 91 AA Marano (1426_CR13) 2020; 85 S Manz (1426_CR17) 2023; 106 L Kark (1426_CR23) 2012; 35 A Leardini (1426_CR5) 2005; 21 M Schepers (1426_CR8) 2018; 1 M Al Borno (1426_CR20) 2022; 19 M Shah (1426_CR28) 2013 AD Kuo (1426_CR1) 2010; 90 R Tranberg (1426_CR26) 2011; 82 P Slade (1426_CR32) 2022; 69 FJ Wouda (1426_CR30) 2021; 18 JL McGinley (1426_CR25) 2009; 29 T McGrath (1426_CR35) 2022; 22 R Baker (1426_CR24) 2009; 30 L Adamowicz (1426_CR33) 2019; 19 H Tsushima (1426_CR38) 2003; 6 D Schnur (1426_CR14) 2014; 25 M Akbarshahi (1426_CR6) 2010; 43 MH Schwartz (1426_CR21) 2008; 28 M Finco (1426_CR12) 2023; 10 A Esquenazi (1426_CR43) 2014; 25 SL Colyer (1426_CR2) 2018; 4 J Rattanakoch (1426_CR9) 2023; 23 AI Cuesta-Vargas (1426_CR36) 2010; 15 S Clemens (1426_CR16) 2020; 72 A Ferrari (1426_CR31) 2010; 31 JS Hebert (1426_CR18) 2017; 5 H Lim (1426_CR41) 2019; 20 R Ravari (1426_CR46) 2023; 105 R Takeda (1426_CR11) 2009; 42 |
| References_xml | – volume: 75 start-page: 98 year: 2020 ident: 1426_CR44 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.029 – volume: 37 start-page: 45 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 1426_CR3 publication-title: G Ital Med Lav Ergon – volume: 43 start-page: 1292 issue: 7 year: 2010 ident: 1426_CR6 publication-title: J Biomech doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.002 – volume: 90 start-page: 157 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 1426_CR1 publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090125 – volume: 91 start-page: 187 year: 2023 ident: 1426_CR19 publication-title: Information Fusion doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.014 – ident: 1426_CR42 doi: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000506 – volume: 6 start-page: 9 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: 1426_CR38 publication-title: J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc doi: 10.1298/jjpta.6.9 – volume: 25 start-page: 35 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 1426_CR14 publication-title: Phys Med Rehabil Clin doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.013 – volume: 8 start-page: 283 year: 2018 ident: 1426_CR39 publication-title: Biomed Eng Lett doi: 10.1007/s13534-018-0072-5 – volume: 19 start-page: 5143 issue: 23 year: 2019 ident: 1426_CR33 publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s19235143 – volume: 4 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1426_CR2 publication-title: Sports Med-Open doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0139-y – volume: 5 issue: 10 year: 2017 ident: 1426_CR18 publication-title: JBJS reviews doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00037 – volume: 19 start-page: 22 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 1426_CR20 publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01001-x – volume: 85 start-page: S33 issue: S1 year: 2020 ident: 1426_CR13 publication-title: Ann Plast Surg doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002329 – volume: 18 issue: 2 year: 2023 ident: 1426_CR15 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281339 – volume: 25 start-page: 153 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 1426_CR43 publication-title: Phys Med Rehabil Clin doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.006 – volume: 28 start-page: 351 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 1426_CR21 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.001 – volume: 98 start-page: 109451 year: 2022 ident: 1426_CR4 publication-title: BioRxiv. – volume: 72 start-page: 102 year: 2020 ident: 1426_CR16 publication-title: Clin Biomech doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.12.007 – volume: 15 start-page: 462 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 1426_CR36 publication-title: Phys Ther Rev doi: 10.1179/1743288X11Y.0000000006 – volume: 42 start-page: 2486 issue: 15 year: 2009 ident: 1426_CR11 publication-title: J Biomech doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.016 – volume: 37 start-page: 757 issue: 8 year: 1990 ident: 1426_CR29 publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng doi: 10.1109/10.102791 – volume: 11 start-page: 25 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 1426_CR22 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00047-8 – volume: 19 start-page: 2474 issue: 11 year: 2019 ident: 1426_CR34 publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s19112474 – volume: 82 start-page: 171 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 1426_CR26 publication-title: Acta Orthop doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.570675 – year: 2013 ident: 1426_CR28 publication-title: J Mech Robot doi: 10.1115/1.4024473 – volume: 24 start-page: 251 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 1426_CR45 publication-title: J Bodyw Mov Ther doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.008 – volume: 22 start-page: 2544 issue: 7 year: 2022 ident: 1426_CR35 publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s22072544 – volume: 14 start-page: 6891 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 1426_CR10 publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s140406891 – volume: 30 start-page: 265 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 1426_CR24 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.020 – volume: 19 start-page: 38 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1426_CR40 publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s19010038 – volume: 105 year: 2023 ident: 1426_CR46 publication-title: Clin Biomech doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105976 – volume: 34 start-page: N63 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: 1426_CR7 publication-title: Physiol Meas doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/34/8/N63 – volume: 18 start-page: 1 year: 2021 ident: 1426_CR30 publication-title: J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00816-4 – volume: 29 start-page: 360 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 1426_CR25 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.003 – volume: 21 start-page: 212 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 1426_CR5 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.05.002 – volume: 31 start-page: 540 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 1426_CR31 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.009 – ident: 1426_CR27 – volume: 20 start-page: 130 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1426_CR41 publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s20010130 – volume: 10 start-page: 205566832311823 year: 2023 ident: 1426_CR12 publication-title: J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng – volume: 106 year: 2023 ident: 1426_CR17 publication-title: Clin Biomech doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105988 – volume: 23 start-page: 1738 issue: 3 year: 2023 ident: 1426_CR9 publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s23031738 – volume: 69 start-page: 678 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 1426_CR32 publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3103201 – volume: 1 start-page: 1 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 1426_CR8 publication-title: Xsens Technol – volume: 35 start-page: 238 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 1426_CR23 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.013 – volume: 30 start-page: 319 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 1426_CR37 publication-title: Clin Biomech doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.005 |
| SSID | ssj0034054 |
| Score | 2.4090135 |
| Snippet | Background
Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial... Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial Measurement... Background Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as Inertial... Background : Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as... Abstract Background Systems that capture motion under laboratory conditions limit validity in real-world environments. Mobile motion capture solutions such as... |
| SourceID | doaj swepub pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 128 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Amputation Amputation, Surgical - rehabilitation Amputees - rehabilitation Analysis Artificial joints Artificial Limbs Biomechanical Phenomena Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Biomedicine Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Femur - surgery Gait analysis Humans IMU motion capture Inertial measurement unit Joint kinematics Male Methodology Methods Motion analysis Motion capture Motion capture validation Neurology Neurosciences Orientation estimation algorithm Osseointegration Osseointegration - physiology Patient outcomes Proof of Concept Study Prosthetic gait Rehabilitation Medicine Transfemoral amputation gait Walking - physiology |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Springer Nature Link Journals dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwELagIAQPFJYrUJCROB5KROI4icNbQVQgtWVVlqpvluOjGwklq82WH8ovYsZJlk1BleA1vo-54plvCHkhMgNqcanCCMN_ubYZkJR1ISjX3HDrnEl9oPBBfnQkTk-LaR8U1g7e7sOTpOfUnqxF9rYFySR4CDIFzF-QK2F2lVwDcSeQHI-_ngz8NwEVhA_hMX9tNxJBHqn_T368IZAuOkuuX0wvoIt6ibS__X9ruUNu9xoo3euuzF1yxdYTcmsDl3BCbhz2L-4T8nIThpjOOgwC-ooejxC-J2R72h_4UOce-XkCOn6Xsok2jn4-_EbVmapAH6XNwv9Cp-skJ1TVhprfDkzYABN7hd3jAl1UCwyct-8obB2WOaq7gEuqQQ7T7umDVjVVdKF6V3HoBn8z05VXztGlGIZUmMWim5SrVqBvd3UUndqlhpLaNuct_dK2tllDaRiKIMrQ330y2_84-_Ap7FNIhBoU1VWobc7KmMWOc6dKkRemcKZgOgYZHbkUdFfLkyhyLLaRKHUJCqEwjFknYu20TR6Qrbqp7SNCMx6XJlI5M1xwy3JRKpGzrAT7MSrTVAQkHi6V1P3mY5aP79KbWSKT3aFLOHTpD11mAdldt1l04CKX1n6Pd3VdE4HB_YdmeSZ7PiNTbsCqNkqYHJEACzAXeQY828VCY3afgLzGmy6RfcH0tOqjMGCRCAQm9wQQUIyodAHZGdUEtqNHxc8HWpFYhL56_oRkAlZykWKagYA87GhnPeek8IB6PCBiRFWjRY1L6mruUc_RMEAFOSBvBpqSPb9tL921g45IR0P0SFpzqec-TVErWys1Zy6BYaRLNJM8cUIKhT0XmuVFkRUq14__bfQn5CbzVI6PATtka7U8t0_Jdf1jVbXLZ55v_QLubJfT priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Validation of IMU against optical reference and development of open-source pipeline: proof of concept case report in a participant with transfemoral amputation fitted with a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-024-01426-6 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39085954 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3086955083 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11290066 https://research.chalmers.se/publication/539796 https://doaj.org/article/54d026da8d70444997446225f18c0961 |
| Volume | 21 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001282233300002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Biological Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: M7P dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Engineering Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: M7S dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Healthcare Administration Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: M0T dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthmanagement providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & allied health premium. customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1743-0003 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0034054 issn: 1743-0003 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20041201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagIAQHHssrUCoj8ThA1MTxJg63FrWiUrdE26VqT5bjB10JZVfNlh_KL2LGzi6bIpULF0u7dpzEHs98E4-_IeSNyA3A4lrFCR7_5drmsKSsiwFcc8Otc2boDwofFkdH4vS0rNZSfWFMWKAHDgO3PeQG3ASjhCmQ2qwE_MtzEEKXCo3pSlD7AupZOlNBB2cAQ_jyiIzIt1uwaoLHYI_AdQabFOc9M-TZ-v_WyWtG6WrA5GrX9ArDqLdK-w_J_Q5O0p3wGo_IDdsMyL01ksEBuTPqts8H5O06pzCdBEIB-o6Oe3TdA_Kg6mZv2eYx-XUCgD3kX6IzRw9G36j6rqYALuls7r-H01XGEqoaQ82faCS8ALN0xWGngM6nczwFbz9RGAOsc1SH05NUg1GlYR-DThuq6Fx1cd_QDX4zpguPtDE-GG6pMCVFeCg3XQB4Dm0UreyFhprGzi5b-rVt7WzFi2EoMiJDf0_IZH9v8vlL3OWDiDWgzkWsbcHqlKWOc6dqUZSmdKZkOgWDm7ghAFHLsyRxLLWJqHUN6E4YxqwTqXbaZk_JRjNr7HNCc57WJlEFM1xwywpRK1GwvAZnMKmHQxGRdCkdUneDjyk7fkjvM4lcBomSIFHSS5TMI_Jhdc08MIVc23oXhW7VElm-_R8g-7KTffkv2Y_IexRZiboIHk-r7kgFvCSyeskdASshRYq5iGz2WoIO0b3q10uhl1iFgXd-hmQGLm85xJwBEXkWFsHqmbPSs-PxiIje8ui9VL-mmZ57CnNE-Yh2I_JxuZJkpzzba0ftMKy23i06Wqxzqc99zqFWtlZqzlwGt5Eu00zyzAkpFPZcalaAk1-qQr_4H5PwktxlXrHg9_5NsrG4uLSvyG39czFtL7bIzWJ8guVp4UuxRW7t7h1V4y2vsKAcJRMsi8qXx1BfHYyqM_g1Pj75DV0dm5g |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9NAEF5BQRwPFMJlKLBIHA9gYa839pq3gqhakYSqhKpvq_UejSXkRHHKD-UXMbO2Q1xQJXj13sdc3plvCHkhUgNqcaHCCMN_ubYpkJR1ISjX3HDrnBn6QOFRNpmIk5P8sA0Kqztv9-5J0nNqT9YifVeDZBI8BJkC5i_IlTC9TK5wkFjoyHf09bjjvwmoILwLj_lru54I8kj9f_LjDYF03lly_WJ6Dl3US6S97f9by21yq9VA6W5zZe6QS7YakJsbuIQDcm3cvrgPyMtNGGI6bTAI6Ct61EP4HpDtw_bAuzp3yc9j0PGblE107ujB-BtVp6oEfZTOF_4XOl0nOaGqMtT8dmDCBpjYK2weF-iiXGDgvH1PYeuwzFHdBFxSDXKYNk8ftKyoogvVuopDN_ibma68co4uxTCkwiwWzaRcuQJ9u6mj6KFdaiip7Pyspl_q2s7XUBqGIogy9HePTPc-TT_uh20KiVCDoroKtc1YEbPYce5UIbLc5M7kTMcgoyM3BN3V8iSKHIttJApdgEIoDGPWiVg7bZP7ZKuaV_YhoSmPCxOpjBkuuGWZKJTIWFqA_RgVw6EISNxdKqnbzccsH9-lN7NEKptDl3Do0h-6TAPyZt1m0YCLXFj7A97VdU0EBvcf5stT2fIZOeQGrGqjhMkQCTAHc5GnwLNdLDRm9wnIa7zpEtkXTE-rNgoDFolAYHJXAAHFiEoXkJ1eTWA7ulf8vKMViUXoq-dPSCZgJedDTDMQkAcN7aznnOQeUI8HRPSoqreofklVzjzqORoGqCAH5G1HU7Llt_WFuzZqiLQ3RIukNZN65tMU1bK2UnPmEhhGukQzyRMnpFDYc65ZludprjL96N9Gf0au70_HIzk6mHx-TG4wT_H4MLBDtlbLM_uEXNU_VmW9fOp52C8ICZq3 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwELagoAoeKCxXoICROB4gauJ4E4e3cqyo2JYVlKpvluOjXQllV5stP5RfxIydLJuCKiFe4_uYK575hpBnIjegFlcqTjD8l2ubA0lZF4NyzQ23zpmhDxQeFwcH4vi4nKxF8Xtv9-5JMsQ0IEpTvdyZGxdIXOQ7DUgpwWOQL2AKg4yJ88vkCsekQWivfz3qeHEG6gjvQmX-2q4njjxq_5-8eU04nXecXL2enkMa9dJptPX_67pJbrSaKd0NV-kWuWTrAbm-hlc4IJv77Uv8gDxfhyemhwGbgL6gX3rI3wOyNWkvQlfnNvl5BLp_SOVEZ47u7X-j6kRNQU-ls7n_tU5XyU-oqg01vx2bsAEm_IrDowOdT-cYUG_fUNhGLHNUh0BMqkE-0_AkQqc1VXSuWhdy6AZ_P9OlV9rR1RiGVJjdIkzKTZegh4c6ik7sQkNJbWdnDf3cNHa2gtgwFMGVob875HD04fDdx7hNLRFrUGCXsbYFq1KWOs6dqkRRmtKZkukUZHfihqDTWp4liWOpTUSlK1AUhWHMOpFqp212l2zUs9reJzTnaWUSVTDDBbesEJUSBcsrsCuTajgUEUm7CyZ1u_mY_eO79OaXyGU4dAmHLv2hyzwir1Zt5gF05MLab_HermoiYLj_MFucyJb_yCE3YG0bJUyBCIElmJE8B17uUqEx609EXuKtl8jWYHpatdEZsEgECJO7AogpRbS6iGz3agI70r3ipx3dSCxCHz5_QjID8iyHmH4gIvcCHa3mnJUeaI9HRPQorLeofkk9PfVo6GgwoOIckdcdfcmWDzcX7to4EGxviBZh61TqU5--qJGNlZozl8Ew0mWaSZ45IYXCnkvNirLMS1XoB_82-hOyOXk_kuO9g08PyTXmCR7fC7bJxnJxZh-Rq_rHctosHnt29gs5LKOb |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation+of+IMU+against+optical+reference+and+development+of+open-source+pipeline%3A+proof+of+concept+case+report+in+a+participant+with+transfemoral+amputation+fitted+with+a+Percutaneous+Osseointegrated+Implant&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroengineering+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Ahmed%2C+Kirstin&rft.au=Taheri%2C+Shayan&rft.au=Weygers%2C+Ive&rft.au=Ortiz-Catalan%2C+Max&rft.date=2024-07-31&rft.issn=1743-0003&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=128&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12984-024-01426-6&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |