Does Feeding Tube Insertion and Its Timing Improve Survival?
Objectives To examine survival with and without a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube using rigorous methods to account for selection bias and to examine whether the timing of feeding tube insertion affected survival. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting All U.S. nursing homes...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Ročník 60; číslo 10; s. 1918 - 1921 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Hoboken, NJ
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.10.2012
Wiley-Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 0002-8614, 1532-5415, 1532-5415 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Shrnutí: | Objectives
To examine survival with and without a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube using rigorous methods to account for selection bias and to examine whether the timing of feeding tube insertion affected survival.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Setting
All U.S. nursing homes (NHs).
Participants
Thirty‐six thousand four hundred ninety‐two NH residents with advanced cognitive impairment from dementia and new problems eating studied between 1999 and 2007.
Measurements
Survival after development of the need for eating assistance and feeding tube insertion.
Results
Of the 36,492 NH residents (88.4% white, mean age 84.9, 87.4% with one feeding tube risk factor), 1,957 (5.4%) had a feeding tube inserted within 1 year of developing eating problems. After multivariate analysis correcting for selection bias with propensity score weights, no difference was found in survival between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.94–1.13). In residents who were tube‐fed, the timing of PEG tube insertion relative to the onset of eating problems was not associated with survival after feeding tube insertion (AHR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.86–1.20, persons with a PEG tube inserted within 1 month of developing an eating problem versus later (4 months) insertion).
Conclusion
Neither insertion of PEG tubes nor timing of insertion affect survival. |
|---|---|
| Bibliografia: | ark:/67375/WNG-61N950S7-H istex:FEFCD18D910120CAD7D4E5FBF4C1170E5D4DBF82 ArticleID:JGS4148 National Institute of Aging Research - No. R01AG024265; No. 1RC1AG036418-01 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
| ISSN: | 0002-8614 1532-5415 1532-5415 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04148.x |