The standardization of clinical ethics consultation and technique’s “long encirclement” of humanity: a response to Brummett and Muaygil

In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) “as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological,” claiming that this framing “amounts to a false dichotomy betwee...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM Ročník 16; číslo 1; s. 13 - 5
Hlavní autoři:	Parks, Benjamin N., Mason, Jordan
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	London BioMed Central 12.10.2021 BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC
Témata:	Adaptation Bioethics Clinical ethics consultation Commentary Credentialing Education Ellul, Jacques Ethicists Ethics Ethics Consultation Ethics, Clinical Humans Medical ethics Methods Phenomenology Philosophy Philosophy of Medicine Proceduralism Propaganda Reference Standards Standardization Theory of Medicine/Bioethics United States United States Saudi Arabia United States > US California Phenomenology Credentialing Clinical ethics consultation Proceduralism Standardization
ISSN:	1747-5341, 1747-5341
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Buďte první, kdo okomentuje tento záznam!