Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review

Background Stringent requirements exist regarding the transparency of the study selection process and the reliability of results. A 2-step selection process is generally recommended; this is conducted by 2 reviewers independently of each other (conventional double-screening). However, the approach i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	BMC medical research methodology Jg. 19; H. 1; S. 132 - 9
Hauptverfasser:	Waffenschmidt, Siw, Knelangen, Marco, Sieben, Wiebke, Bühn, Stefanie, Pieper, Dawid
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	London BioMed Central 28.06.2019 BioMed Central Ltd BMC
Schlagworte:	Abstracting and Indexing - methods Abstracting and Indexing - standards Abstracting and Indexing - statistics & numerical data Budgets Conferences and conventions Data collection Evaluation Health Sciences Humans Information Storage and Retrieval - methods Information Storage and Retrieval - standards Information Systems - standards Information Systems - statistics & numerical data Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methodology Methods Publications - standards Publications - statistics & numerical data PubMed - standards PubMed - statistics & numerical data quality reporting Research Article Statistical Theory and Methods Statistics for Life Sciences Study selection Systematic reviews Systematic Reviews as Topic Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Germany Methodology Systematic reviews Study selection
ISSN:	1471-2288, 1471-2288
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!