Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review

Background Stringent requirements exist regarding the transparency of the study selection process and the reliability of results. A 2-step selection process is generally recommended; this is conducted by 2 reviewers independently of each other (conventional double-screening). However, the approach i...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	BMC medical research methodology Ročník 19; číslo 1; s. 132 - 9
Hlavní autoři:	Waffenschmidt, Siw, Knelangen, Marco, Sieben, Wiebke, Bühn, Stefanie, Pieper, Dawid
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	London BioMed Central 28.06.2019 BioMed Central Ltd BMC
Témata:	Abstracting and Indexing - methods Abstracting and Indexing - standards Abstracting and Indexing - statistics & numerical data Budgets Conferences and conventions Data collection Evaluation Health Sciences Humans Information Storage and Retrieval - methods Information Storage and Retrieval - standards Information Systems - standards Information Systems - statistics & numerical data Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methodology Methods Publications - standards Publications - statistics & numerical data PubMed - standards PubMed - statistics & numerical data quality reporting Research Article Statistical Theory and Methods Statistics for Life Sciences Study selection Systematic reviews Systematic Reviews as Topic Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Germany Methodology Systematic reviews Study selection
ISSN:	1471-2288, 1471-2288
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Buďte první, kdo okomentuje tento záznam!