Panels with non-stationary multifactor error structures

The presence of cross-sectionally correlated error terms invalidates much inferential theory of panel data models. Recently, work by Pesaran (2006) has suggested a method which makes use of cross-sectional averages to provide valid inference in the case of stationary panel regressions with a multifa...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of econometrics Ročník 160; číslo 2; s. 326 - 348
Hlavní autoři: Kapetanios, G., Pesaran, M. Hashem, Yamagata, T.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.02.2011
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Edice:Journal of Econometrics
Témata:
ISSN:0304-4076, 1872-6895
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:The presence of cross-sectionally correlated error terms invalidates much inferential theory of panel data models. Recently, work by Pesaran (2006) has suggested a method which makes use of cross-sectional averages to provide valid inference in the case of stationary panel regressions with a multifactor error structure. This paper extends this work and examines the important case where the unobservable common factors follow unit root processes. The extension to I ( 1 ) processes is remarkable on two counts. First, it is of great interest to note that while intermediate results needed for deriving the asymptotic distribution of the panel estimators differ between the I ( 1 ) and I ( 0 ) cases, the final results are surprisingly similar. This is in direct contrast to the standard distributional results for I ( 1 ) processes that radically differ from those for I ( 0 ) processes. Second, it is worth noting the significant extra technical demands required to prove the new results. The theoretical findings are further supported for small samples via an extensive Monte Carlo study. In particular, the results of the Monte Carlo study suggest that the cross-sectional-average-based method is robust to a wide variety of data generation processes and has lower biases than the alternative estimation methods considered in the paper.
Bibliografie:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ISSN:0304-4076
1872-6895
DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.10.001