Computer Algorithms To Detect Bloodstream Infections

We compared manual and computer-assisted bloodstream infection surveillance for adult inpatients at two hospitals. We identified hospital-acquired, primary, central-venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infections by using five methods: retrospective, manual record review by investigators; pr...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Emerging infectious diseases Ročník 10; číslo 9; s. 1612 - 1620
Hlavní autori: Trick, William E., Zagorski, Brandon M., Tokars, Jerome I., Vernon, Michael O., Welbel, Sharon F., Wisniewski, Mary F., Richards, Chesley, Weinstein, Robert A.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases 01.09.2004
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Predmet:
Algorithms
bloodstream infection
Catheterization - adverse effects
Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects
Community-Acquired Infections
computer data processing
Cross Infection - epidemiology
Humans
Infection
Infection Control
information system
Sepsis - diagnosis
Sepsis - epidemiology
Sepsis - etiology
surveillance
United States
ISSN:1080-6040, 1080-6059
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:We compared manual and computer-assisted bloodstream infection surveillance for adult inpatients at two hospitals. We identified hospital-acquired, primary, central-venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infections by using five methods: retrospective, manual record review by investigators; prospective, manual review by infection control professionals; positive blood culture plus manual CVC determination; computer algorithms; and computer algorithms and manual CVC determination. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, plus the kappa statistic (kappa) between investigator review and other methods, and we correlated infection rates for seven units. The kappa value was 0.37 for infection control review, 0.48 for positive blood culture plus manual CVC determination, 0.49 for computer algorithm, and 0.73 for computer algorithm plus manual CVC determination. Unit-specific infection rates, per 1,000 patient days, were 1.0-12.5 by investigator review and 1.4-10.2 by computer algorithm (correlation r = 0.91, p = 0.004). Automated bloodstream infection surveillance with electronic data is an accurate alternative to surveillance with manually collected data.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1080-6040
1080-6059
DOI:10.3201/eid1009.030978