Hotspots in research on the measurement of medical students’ clinical competence from 2012-2016 based on co-word analysis

Background This study aimed to identify hotspots in research on clinical competence measurements from 2012 to 2016. Methods The authors retrieved literature published between 2012 and 2016 from PubMed using selected medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. They used BibExcel software to generate high-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC medical education Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 162 - 6
Main Authors: Chang, Xing, Zhou, Xin, Luo, Linzhi, Yang, Chengjia, Pan, Hui, Zhang, Shuyang
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London BioMed Central 12.09.2017
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Subjects:
ISSN:1472-6920, 1472-6920
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background This study aimed to identify hotspots in research on clinical competence measurements from 2012 to 2016. Methods The authors retrieved literature published between 2012 and 2016 from PubMed using selected medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. They used BibExcel software to generate high-frequency MeSH terms and identified hotspots by co-word analysis and cluster analysis. Results The authors searched 588 related articles and identified 31 high-frequency MeSH terms. In addition, they obtained 6 groups of high-frequency MeSH terms that reflected the domain hotspots. Conclusions This study identified 6 hotspots of domain research, including studies on influencing factors and perception evaluation, improving and developing measurement tools, feedback measurement, measurement approaches based on computer simulation, the measurement of specific students in different learning phases, and the measurement of students’ communication ability. All of these research topics could provide useful information for educators and researchers to continually conduct in-depth studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1472-6920
1472-6920
DOI:10.1186/s12909-017-0999-8