Single-Dose Azithromycin versus Penicillin G Benzathine for the Treatment of Early Syphilis
This randomized trial involving patients with early syphilis in Tanzania found that treatment with 2 g of azithromycin led to cure rates that were similar to those for penicillin G benzathine at both nine months (97.7 percent and 95.0 percent, respectively) and six months (85.5 percent and 81.5 perc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine Jg. 353; H. 12; S. 1236 - 1244 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Boston, MA
Massachusetts Medical Society
22.09.2005
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0028-4793, 1533-4406, 1533-4406 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | This randomized trial involving patients with early syphilis in Tanzania found that treatment with 2 g of azithromycin led to cure rates that were similar to those for penicillin G benzathine at both nine months (97.7 percent and 95.0 percent, respectively) and six months (85.5 percent and 81.5 percent, respectively). This single-dose, oral regimen may be particularly useful in settings in which there are shortages of sterile equipment and trained personnel.
In 328 patients with early syphilis in Tanzania, treatment with 2 g of azithromycin led to cure rates that were similar to those for penicillin G benzathine at both nine months and six months.
A single intramuscular injection of 2.4 million units (MU) of penicillin G benzathine is the recommended therapy for early syphilis.
1
Major advantages of this regimen are its low cost and absence of problems related to poor adherence, whereas disadvantages include pain associated with large-volume (4 ml), deep, intramuscular injections; the relatively high prevalence of self-reported penicillin allergy in some settings; and the need for injection equipment and medically trained personnel, which may be lacking in countries with few health resources. In addition, there are risks of transmission of blood-borne infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), if injection equipment is . . . |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-General Information-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-3 ObjectType-Article-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 1533-4406 |
| DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa044284 |