Systematic review of social media interventions for smoking cessation

Popular social media could extend the reach of smoking cessation efforts. In this systematic review, our objectives were: 1) to determine whether social media interventions for smoking cessation are feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective; 2) to identify approaches for recruiting subjects; a...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Addictive behaviors Ročník 73; s. 81 - 93
Hlavní autori: Naslund, John A., Kim, Sunny Jung, Aschbrenner, Kelly A., McCulloch, Laura J., Brunette, Mary F., Dallery, Jesse, Bartels, Stephen J., Marsch, Lisa A.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2017
Elsevier Science Ltd
Predmet:
Acceptability
Advertisements
Advertising
Attrition
Cessation
Drug addiction
Electronic publishing
Evidence-based medicine
Feasibility
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Intervention
Liking
Mass media effects
Patient Participation - methods
Patient Satisfaction
Patient Selection
Psychiatry
Recruitment
Relapse
Reminders
Retention
Reviews
Smoking
Smoking cessation
Smoking Cessation - methods
Social Media
Social networking
Social networks
Systematic review
Technology
Tobacco
Tobacco
Cessation
Technology
Social media
Social networking
Smoking
ISSN:0306-4603, 1873-6327, 1873-6327
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Popular social media could extend the reach of smoking cessation efforts. In this systematic review, our objectives were: 1) to determine whether social media interventions for smoking cessation are feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective; 2) to identify approaches for recruiting subjects; and 3) to examine the specific intervention design components and strategies employed to promote user engagement and retention. We searched Scopus, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science through July 2016 and reference lists of relevant articles. Included studies described social media interventions for smoking cessation and must have reported outcomes related to feasibility, acceptability, usability, or smoking-related outcomes. We identified 7 studies (all were published since 2014) that enrolled 9755 participants (median=136 [range 40 to 9042]). Studies mainly used Facebook (n=4) or Twitter (n=2), and emerged as feasible and acceptable. Five studies reported smoking-related outcomes such as greater abstinence, reduction in relapse, and an increase in quit attempts. Most studies (n=6) recruited participants using online or Facebook advertisements. Tailored content, targeted reminders, and moderated discussions were used to promote participant engagement. Three studies found that active participation through posting comments or liking content may be associated with improved outcomes. Retention ranged from 35% to 84% (median=70%) across the included studies. Our review highlights the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of social media interventions for smoking cessation. Future research should continue to explore approaches for promoting user engagement and retention, and whether sustained engagement translates to clinically meaningful smoking cessation outcomes. •Social media interventions for smoking cessation emerged as feasible and acceptable.•Several social media interventions contributed to improved smoking-related outcomes.•Engagement in social media programs may predict improved smoking-related outcomes.•Social media holds potential to support population wide smoking cessation efforts.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0306-4603
1873-6327
1873-6327
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.002