A randomized clinical trial of Cogmed Working Memory Training in school-age children with ADHD: a replication in a diverse sample using a control condition
Background Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT) has received considerable attention as a promising intervention for the treatment of Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children. At the same time, methodological weaknesses in previous clinical trials call into question reported effic...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of child psychology and psychiatry Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 247 - 255 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2014
Wiley-Blackwell Blackwell |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0021-9630, 1469-7610, 1469-7610 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background
Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT) has received considerable attention as a promising intervention for the treatment of Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children. At the same time, methodological weaknesses in previous clinical trials call into question reported efficacy of CWMT. In particular, lack of equivalence in key aspects of CWMT (i.e., contingent reinforcement, time‐on‐task with computer training, parent–child interactions, supportive coaching) between CWMT and placebo versions of CWMT used in previous trials may account for the beneficial outcomes favoring CWMT.
Methods
Eighty‐five 7‐ to 11‐year old school‐age children with ADHD (66 male; 78%) were randomized to either standard CWMT (CWMT Active) or a well‐controlled CWMT placebo condition (CWMT Placebo) and evaluated before and 3 weeks after treatment. Dependent measures included parent and teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms; objective measures of attention, activity level, and impulsivity; and psychometric indices of working memory and academic achievement (Clinical trial title: Combined cognitive remediation and behavioral intervention for the treatment of Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01137318).
Results
CWMT Active participants demonstrated significantly greater improvements in verbal and nonverbal working memory storage, but evidenced no discernible gains in working memory storage plus processing/manipulation. In addition, no treatment group differences were observed for any other outcome measures.
Conclusions
When a more rigorous comparison condition is utilized, CWMT demonstrates effects on certain aspects of working memory in children with ADHD; however, CWMT does not appear to foster treatment generalization to other domains of functioning. As such, CWMT should not be considered a viable treatment for children with ADHD. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | istex:411D00CC788B11FA5AE9B1E24B02443D2ECC988A Table S1. Observed means and standard deviations for outcome measures by CWMT treatment group by assessment period National Institute of Mental Health - No. R34MH088845 ArticleID:JCPP12146 ark:/67375/WNG-PCCV8C4P-Q SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ISSN: | 0021-9630 1469-7610 1469-7610 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jcpp.12146 |