The screening value of RT-LAMP and RT-PCR in the diagnosis of COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis

•RT-PCR and RT-LAMP are widely used; however false negative rate (FNR) are 6% ∼ 12 %.•Sensitivity and FNR of index test were significantly affected by the reference method.•PCR is not the perfect gold standard for comparison of diagnostic accuracy with COVID-19.•Performance of RT-LAMP may be exagger...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of virological methods Jg. 300; S. 114392
Hauptverfasser:	Pu, Ruiyang, Liu, Sha, Ren, Xiaoyu, Shi, Dian, Ba, Yupei, Huo, Yanbei, Zhang, Wenling, Ma, Lingling, Liu, Yanyan, Yang, Yan, Cheng, Ning
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.02.2022
Schlagworte:	COVID-19 COVID-19 infection Diagnostic accuracy disease diagnosis False-negative rate genes Humans meta-analysis Molecular Diagnostic Techniques Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Reverse Transcription reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification RT-LAMP RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 Sensitivity and Specificity Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 systematic review COVID-19 RT-LAMP False-negative rate Diagnostic accuracy RT-PCR
ISSN:	0166-0934, 1879-0984, 1879-0984
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!