The screening value of RT-LAMP and RT-PCR in the diagnosis of COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis

•RT-PCR and RT-LAMP are widely used; however false negative rate (FNR) are 6% ∼ 12 %.•Sensitivity and FNR of index test were significantly affected by the reference method.•PCR is not the perfect gold standard for comparison of diagnostic accuracy with COVID-19.•Performance of RT-LAMP may be exagger...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Journal of virological methods Ročník 300; s. 114392
Hlavní autori:	Pu, Ruiyang, Liu, Sha, Ren, Xiaoyu, Shi, Dian, Ba, Yupei, Huo, Yanbei, Zhang, Wenling, Ma, Lingling, Liu, Yanyan, Yang, Yan, Cheng, Ning
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.02.2022
Predmet:	COVID-19 COVID-19 infection Diagnostic accuracy disease diagnosis False-negative rate genes Humans meta-analysis Molecular Diagnostic Techniques Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Reverse Transcription reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification RT-LAMP RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 Sensitivity and Specificity Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 systematic review COVID-19 RT-LAMP False-negative rate Diagnostic accuracy RT-PCR
ISSN:	0166-0934, 1879-0984, 1879-0984
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Buďte prvý, kto okomentuje tento záznam!