Benefits and harms of non-surgical and non-pharmacological management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•Exercise programs and rigid bracing reduce pain in people with vertebral fractures.•Exercise and bracing may not increase activity or quality of life after vertebral fracture.•Exercise is not associated with harm after vertebral fracture. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures affect a large number of ol...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil)) Ročník 26; číslo 1; s. 100383
Hlavní autoři: Bolton, Karen, Wallis, Jason A, Taylor, Nicholas F
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Brazil Elsevier España, S.L.U 01.01.2022
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
Témata:
Aged
Bracing
Exercise
Humans
Osteoporotic Fractures - therapy
Osteoporotic vertebral fracture
Pain
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Quality of Life
Rehabilitation
Spinal Fractures - therapy
Systematic Review
Bracing
Exercise
Osteoporotic vertebral fracture
Rehabilitation
ISSN:1413-3555, 1809-9246, 1809-9246
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:•Exercise programs and rigid bracing reduce pain in people with vertebral fractures.•Exercise and bracing may not increase activity or quality of life after vertebral fracture.•Exercise is not associated with harm after vertebral fracture. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures affect a large number of older adults Systematically review evidence of the benefits and harms of non-surgical and non-pharmacological management of people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures compared with standard care (control); and evaluate the benefits and harms of non-surgical and non-pharmacological management of people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures compared with an alternative non-pharmacological, non-invasive intervention. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Five electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, and COCHRANE) were searched. Eligible trials included participants with primary osteoporosis and at least one vertebral fracture diagnosed on radiographs, with treatment that was non-surgical and non-pharmacological involving more than one session. Twenty randomized controlled trials were included with 2083 participants with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Exercise, bracing, multimodal therapy, electrotherapy, and taping were investigated interventions. Meta-analyses provided low certainty evidence that exercise interventions compared to no exercise were effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (mean difference (MD)= 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08, 1.93), and low certainty evidence that rigid bracing intervention compared with no bracing was effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (MD= 2.61; 95%CI: 0.95, 4.27). Meta-analyses showed no differences in harms between exercise and no exercise groups. No health-related quality of life or activity improvements were demonstrated for exercise interventions, bracing, electrotherapy, or multimodal interventions. Exercise and rigid bracing as management for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures may have a small benefit for pain without increasing risk of harm. PROSPERO registration number CRD42012002936
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:1413-3555
1809-9246
1809-9246
DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.100383