The Preventiometer - reliability of a cardiovascular multi-device measurement platform and its measurement agreement with a cohort study

Background Multimedia multi-device measurement platforms may make the assessment of prevention-related medical variables with a focus on cardiovascular outcomes more attractive and time-efficient. The aim of the studies was to evaluate the reliability (Study 1) and the measurement agreement with a c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC medical research methodology Jg. 23; H. 1; S. 103 - 18
Hauptverfasser: Junge, Martin, Krüger, Markus, Wahner-Roedler, Dietlind L., Bauer, Brent A., Dörr, Marcus, Bahls, Martin, Chenot, Jean-François, Biffar, Reiner, Schmidt, Carsten O.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: London BioMed Central 24.04.2023
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Schlagworte:
Agreement
Agreements
Bias
Bland-Altman Plots
Blood Pressure
Body fat
Cardiovascular diseases
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Diagnosis
Evaluation
Health Sciences
Heart rate
Humans
Measurement
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Method-comparison studies
Preventive medicine
Pulse oximetry
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Research Design
Spirometry
Statistical Theory and Methods
Statistics for Life Sciences
Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
Validity
Germany
Measurement
Bland-Altman Plots
Agreement
Validity
Reliability
Method-comparison studies
ISSN:1471-2288, 1471-2288
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Multimedia multi-device measurement platforms may make the assessment of prevention-related medical variables with a focus on cardiovascular outcomes more attractive and time-efficient. The aim of the studies was to evaluate the reliability (Study 1) and the measurement agreement with a cohort study (Study 2) of selected measures of such a device, the Preventiometer. Methods In Study 1 ( N  = 75), we conducted repeated measurements in two Preventiometers for four examinations (blood pressure measurement, pulse oximetry, body fat measurement, and spirometry) to analyze their agreement and derive (retest-)reliability estimates. In Study 2 ( N  = 150), we compared somatometry, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, body fat, and spirometry measurements in the Preventiometer with corresponding measurements used in the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) to evaluate measurement agreement. Results Intraclass correlations coefficients (ICCs) ranged from .84 to .99 for all examinations in Study 1. Whereas bias was not an issue for most examinations in Study 2, limits of agreement for most examinations were very large compared to results of similar method comparison studies. Conclusion We observed a high retest-reliability of the assessed clinical examinations in the Preventiometer. Some disagreements between Preventiometer and SHIP examinations can be attributed to procedural differences in the examinations. Methodological and technical improvements are recommended before using the Preventiometer in population-based research.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-2288
1471-2288
DOI:10.1186/s12874-023-01911-x