Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Cirrhotic Liver: A Case–Control Study

Background Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case–control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-t...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	World journal of surgery Vol. 38; no. 11; pp. 2919 - 2926
Main Authors:	Memeo, Riccardo, de’Angelis, Nicola, Compagnon, Philippe, Salloum, Chady, Cherqui, Daniel, Laurent, Alexis, Azoulay, Daniel
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Boston Springer US 01.11.2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects:	Abdominal Surgery Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery Cardiac Surgery Cirrhotic Patient Disease-Free Survival Female Future Remnant Liver General Surgery Hepatectomy - methods Humans Laparoscopic Liver Resection Laparoscopy Length of Stay Liver Cirrhosis - complications Liver Cirrhosis - surgery Liver Neoplasms - complications Liver Neoplasms - surgery Liver Resection Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Operative Time Postoperative Complications - etiology Retrospective Studies Short Operative Time Surgery Survival Rate Thoracic Surgery Vascular Surgery Short Operative Time Future Remnant Liver Cirrhotic Patient Laparoscopic Liver Resection Liver Resection
ISSN:	0364-2313, 1432-2323, 1432-2323
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	Background Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case–control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-term patient survival between laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis. Methods A total of 45 patients treated with LLR were matched by cause of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, type of surgical resection (subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and bisegmentectomy), tumor number, tumor size, and alpha-fetoprotein value with 45 patients treated with OLR. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were compared between groups. Results Compared with OLR, the LLR group displayed a significantly shorter operative time (140 vs. 180 min; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 12 days; p < 0.0001), and lower morbidity rate (20 vs. 45 % of patients; p = 0.01). A higher rate of R0 resection was observed in the LLR group than in the OLR group (95 vs. 85 %; p = 0.03). Postoperative ascites was more frequently observed in the OLR group (18 vs. 2 %; p = 0.01). Mortality, patient, and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88, 59, and 12 %, respectively, in the LLR group and 63, 44, and 22 % in the OLR group ( p = 0.27). Conclusions Significantly shorter operative times, better resection margins, lower postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay were observed in the LLR group compared with the OLR group. LLR and OLR have similar overall and disease-free survival rates in cirrhotic HCC patients.
AbstractList	Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-term patient survival between laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis. A total of 45 patients treated with LLR were matched by cause of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, type of surgical resection (subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and bisegmentectomy), tumor number, tumor size, and alpha-fetoprotein value with 45 patients treated with OLR. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were compared between groups. Compared with OLR, the LLR group displayed a significantly shorter operative time (140 vs. 180 min; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 12 days; p < 0.0001), and lower morbidity rate (20 vs. 45 % of patients; p = 0.01). A higher rate of R0 resection was observed in the LLR group than in the OLR group (95 vs. 85 %; p = 0.03). Postoperative ascites was more frequently observed in the OLR group (18 vs. 2 %; p = 0.01). Mortality, patient, and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88, 59, and 12 %, respectively, in the LLR group and 63, 44, and 22 % in the OLR group (p = 0.27). Significantly shorter operative times, better resection margins, lower postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay were observed in the LLR group compared with the OLR group. LLR and OLR have similar overall and disease-free survival rates in cirrhotic HCC patients.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-term patient survival between laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis. A total of 45 patients treated with LLR were matched by cause of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, type of surgical resection (subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and bisegmentectomy), tumor number, tumor size, and alpha-fetoprotein value with 45 patients treated with OLR. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were compared between groups. Compared with OLR, the LLR group displayed a significantly shorter operative time (140 vs. 180 min; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 12 days; p < 0.0001), and lower morbidity rate (20 vs. 45 % of patients; p = 0.01). A higher rate of R0 resection was observed in the LLR group than in the OLR group (95 vs. 85 %; p = 0.03). Postoperative ascites was more frequently observed in the OLR group (18 vs. 2 %; p = 0.01). Mortality, patient, and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88, 59, and 12 %, respectively, in the LLR group and 63, 44, and 22 % in the OLR group (p = 0.27). Significantly shorter operative times, better resection margins, lower postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay were observed in the LLR group compared with the OLR group. LLR and OLR have similar overall and disease-free survival rates in cirrhotic HCC patients. Background Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case–control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-term patient survival between laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis. Methods A total of 45 patients treated with LLR were matched by cause of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, type of surgical resection (subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and bisegmentectomy), tumor number, tumor size, and alpha-fetoprotein value with 45 patients treated with OLR. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were compared between groups. Results Compared with OLR, the LLR group displayed a significantly shorter operative time (140 vs. 180 min; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 12 days; p < 0.0001), and lower morbidity rate (20 vs. 45 % of patients; p = 0.01). A higher rate of R0 resection was observed in the LLR group than in the OLR group (95 vs. 85 %; p = 0.03). Postoperative ascites was more frequently observed in the OLR group (18 vs. 2 %; p = 0.01). Mortality, patient, and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88, 59, and 12 %, respectively, in the LLR group and 63, 44, and 22 % in the OLR group ( p = 0.27). Conclusions Significantly shorter operative times, better resection margins, lower postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay were observed in the LLR group compared with the OLR group. LLR and OLR have similar overall and disease-free survival rates in cirrhotic HCC patients. Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-term patient survival between laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis.BACKGROUNDLaparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-term patient survival between laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis.A total of 45 patients treated with LLR were matched by cause of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, type of surgical resection (subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and bisegmentectomy), tumor number, tumor size, and alpha-fetoprotein value with 45 patients treated with OLR. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were compared between groups.METHODSA total of 45 patients treated with LLR were matched by cause of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, type of surgical resection (subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and bisegmentectomy), tumor number, tumor size, and alpha-fetoprotein value with 45 patients treated with OLR. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were compared between groups.Compared with OLR, the LLR group displayed a significantly shorter operative time (140 vs. 180 min; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 12 days; p < 0.0001), and lower morbidity rate (20 vs. 45 % of patients; p = 0.01). A higher rate of R0 resection was observed in the LLR group than in the OLR group (95 vs. 85 %; p = 0.03). Postoperative ascites was more frequently observed in the OLR group (18 vs. 2 %; p = 0.01). Mortality, patient, and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88, 59, and 12 %, respectively, in the LLR group and 63, 44, and 22 % in the OLR group (p = 0.27).RESULTSCompared with OLR, the LLR group displayed a significantly shorter operative time (140 vs. 180 min; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 12 days; p < 0.0001), and lower morbidity rate (20 vs. 45 % of patients; p = 0.01). A higher rate of R0 resection was observed in the LLR group than in the OLR group (95 vs. 85 %; p = 0.03). Postoperative ascites was more frequently observed in the OLR group (18 vs. 2 %; p = 0.01). Mortality, patient, and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88, 59, and 12 %, respectively, in the LLR group and 63, 44, and 22 % in the OLR group (p = 0.27).Significantly shorter operative times, better resection margins, lower postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay were observed in the LLR group compared with the OLR group. LLR and OLR have similar overall and disease-free survival rates in cirrhotic HCC patients.CONCLUSIONSSignificantly shorter operative times, better resection margins, lower postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay were observed in the LLR group compared with the OLR group. LLR and OLR have similar overall and disease-free survival rates in cirrhotic HCC patients. Background Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case–control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long‐term patient survival between laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis. Methods A total of 45 patients treated with LLR were matched by cause of cirrhosis, Child‐Pugh score, type of surgical resection (subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and bisegmentectomy), tumor number, tumor size, and alpha‐fetoprotein value with 45 patients treated with OLR. Pre‐, intra‐, and post‐operative variables were compared between groups. Results Compared with OLR, the LLR group displayed a significantly shorter operative time (140 vs. 180 min; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 12 days; p < 0.0001), and lower morbidity rate (20 vs. 45 % of patients; p = 0.01). A higher rate of R0 resection was observed in the LLR group than in the OLR group (95 vs. 85 %; p = 0.03). Postoperative ascites was more frequently observed in the OLR group (18 vs. 2 %; p = 0.01). Mortality, patient, and disease‐free survival rates were similar between groups. The 1‐, 5‐, and 10‐year survival rates were 88, 59, and 12 %, respectively, in the LLR group and 63, 44, and 22 % in the OLR group (p = 0.27). Conclusions Significantly shorter operative times, better resection margins, lower postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay were observed in the LLR group compared with the OLR group. LLR and OLR have similar overall and disease‐free survival rates in cirrhotic HCC patients.
Author	Memeo, Riccardo de’Angelis, Nicola Azoulay, Daniel Laurent, Alexis Compagnon, Philippe Salloum, Chady Cherqui, Daniel
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Riccardo surname: Memeo fullname: Memeo, Riccardo email: drmemeo@yahoo.it organization: Digestive, HPB and Transplant Liver Surgery Unit, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Université Paris Est–Créteil, UPEC – sequence: 2 givenname: Nicola surname: de’Angelis fullname: de’Angelis, Nicola organization: Digestive, HPB and Transplant Liver Surgery Unit, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Université Paris Est–Créteil, UPEC – sequence: 3 givenname: Philippe surname: Compagnon fullname: Compagnon, Philippe organization: Digestive, HPB and Transplant Liver Surgery Unit, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Université Paris Est–Créteil, UPEC – sequence: 4 givenname: Chady surname: Salloum fullname: Salloum, Chady organization: Digestive, HPB and Transplant Liver Surgery Unit, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Université Paris Est–Créteil, UPEC – sequence: 5 givenname: Daniel surname: Cherqui fullname: Cherqui, Daniel organization: Centre Hepatobiliaire, Hopital Paul Brousse, Université Paris Sud – sequence: 6 givenname: Alexis surname: Laurent fullname: Laurent, Alexis organization: Digestive, HPB and Transplant Liver Surgery Unit, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Université Paris Est–Créteil, UPEC – sequence: 7 givenname: Daniel surname: Azoulay fullname: Azoulay, Daniel organization: Digestive, HPB and Transplant Liver Surgery Unit, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Université Paris Est–Créteil, UPEC
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24912628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqFkc1u1TAQRi1URG8LD8AGWWLDJsV2Ev-wayPagq5UiYJYWo4zhlRJHOyk6HbFO_QNeRIcUhCqBKy8mHNmxvMdoL3BD4DQU0qOKCHiZSSEcZkRWmSMlyq7eYA2tMhZxnKW76ENyXmq5DTfRwcxXhFCBSf8EdpnhaKMM7lB_daMJvho_dhafB2P8MUIA9621xDwO4hgp9YP2PmAz2E0k7fQdXNnAq5MsO3ge4O9w1Ubwmc_pRY_zVf4ONUjfP92W_lhCr7Dl9Pc7B6jh850EZ7cvYfow-nr99V5tr04e1MdbzNbllJl0ilOiJO8qSVllNQ1a2poJBRO2Jw3QuZKqEK4whYArnZKWFGrogRQhWpcfoherH3H4L_MECfdt3HZ3Azg56gpJyonijCZ0Of30Cs_hyFtt1C0VFKKIlHP7qi57qHRY2h7E3b61yETQFfApmPGAO43QolewtJrWDqFpZew9E1yxD3HtpNZ7j0F03b_NNVqfm072P1_lP749vLklAhSquSy1Y1JGz5B-OPDfx34A6Sxus8
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2019_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2018_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002996 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2020_0408 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2017_01_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2020_05_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2021_10_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2015_03_021 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_1021804 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bmt_2022_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000001495 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2018_02_642 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2014_0477 crossref_primary_10_1177_00031348241241616 crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v13_i10_1110 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2019_0427 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000001413 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_020_05646_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2016_03_610 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2017_0518 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4586_y crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_017_6308_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_hep_29913 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_020_02056_x crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000002072 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_07302_y crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_020_09019_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_024_01882_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2018_01_001 crossref_primary_10_25083_2559_5555_4_2_127_131 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2016_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_1746895 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2016_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_019_0700_y crossref_primary_10_4103_tcmj_tcmj_5_24 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_018_6347_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1470_2045_16_30569_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2018_11_055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2020_03_227 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_015_0316_1 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v9_i11_2419 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijso_2020_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4253_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11195831 crossref_primary_10_4254_wjh_v9_i4_167 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_017_0413_4 crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v14_i5_409 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2021_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06781_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_hepr_13061 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5498_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2018_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000005182 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2017_12_021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_020_07843_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10353_018_0544_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_016_4748_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2019_10_026 crossref_primary_10_1111_hepr_13057 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_74424_y crossref_primary_10_4254_wjh_v8_i13_591 crossref_primary_10_1111_ases_12492 crossref_primary_10_1177_1073274817729234 crossref_primary_10_1111_hepr_12592 crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_16719 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhep_2017_09_017 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_215 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15020488 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2016_0576 crossref_primary_10_1159_000439274 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2020_08_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2017_11_011 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000904 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5711_x crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0186336 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_017_0421_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11901_024_00666_3 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_014_4350_x crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000415 crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_6868745 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2016_0541 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_018_6431_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhep_2015_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2021_05_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2024_12_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2016_06_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19031068 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14061379 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_652272 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_018_6926_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_life13010132 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06840_9 crossref_primary_10_1159_000489836 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2017_05_005 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i6_1975 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_018_1671_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_917 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2021_05_017 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000001854 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_956382 crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v8_i1_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2017_08_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_10_017 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2018_0588 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2017_08_028 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10462_021_10023_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000027826
Cites_doi	10.1111/hpb.12117 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd582b 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b3b2d8 10.1097/01.sla.0000206017.29651.99 10.1001/archsurg.2008.536 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825a01f6 10.1067/msy.2002.121892 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd93b2 10.1001/archsurg.2010.248 10.1007/s00534-009-0120-8 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO;2-E 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01622-8 10.1245/s10434-007-9749-1 10.1007/s00464-002-9047-8 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00594.x 10.1007/s00464-008-9789-z 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.763 10.1007/s00464-007-9503-6 10.1007/s004649900664 10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df 10.1007/s00268-011-1212-6 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b947a 10.1002/hep.510240201 10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1207 10.1002/jso.21541 10.1007/s00464-008-0022-x 10.1245/s10434-009-0414-8 10.1245/s10434‐009‐0414‐8 10.1007/s00268‐011‐1212‐6 10.1245/s10434‐007‐9749‐1 10.1007/s00464‐002‐9047‐8 10.1007/s00464‐008‐0022‐x 10.1007/s00534‐009‐0120‐8 10.1111/j.1477‐2574.2012.00594.x 10.1016/S1072‐7515(02)01622‐8 10.1007/s00464‐008‐9789‐z 10.1007/s00464‐007‐9503‐6 10.1002/1097‐0142(195405)7:3<462::AID‐CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO;2‐E 10.1007/s00464‐009‐0745‐3
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 2014 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie
Copyright_xml	– notice: Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 – notice: 2014 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie
DBID	AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QO 7T5 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FD 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FR3 FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8
DOI	10.1007/s00268-014-2659-z
DatabaseName	CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Collection (NC LIVE) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Immunology Abstracts Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	Technology Research Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Medicine
EISSN	1432-2323
EndPage	2926
ExternalDocumentID	3453077861 24912628 10_1007_s00268_014_2659_z WJSBF07059
Genre	article Journal Article Comparative Study
GroupedDBID	--- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .55 .86 .GJ .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 199 1N0 1OC 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29R 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3O- 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAHQN AAIAL AAIPD AAJBT AAJKR AAMNL AANXM AANZL AAQQT AARHV AARTL AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABLJU ABMNI ABMOR ABMQK ABNWP ABOCM ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABQWH ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACBXY ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPRK ACUDM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADIYS ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFFNX AFFPM AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBTC AHBYD AHIZS AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AITYG AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DCZOG DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBD EBS EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GXS H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HGLYW HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z J5H JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH L7B LAS LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- MEWTI N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SUPJJ SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WH7 WJK WK8 WXSBR X7M YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7X Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8V Z8W Z91 Z92 ZGI ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX AAMMB ABFSG ACSTC ADHKG AEFGJ AEYWJ AEZWR AFHIU AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHPBZ AHWEU AIDQK AIDYY AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY AAYXX AFFHD CITATION EBLON LH4 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7T5 7XB 8FD 8FK FR3 H94 K9. P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c5589-8f9600f86db81210bb2dbed8e4f7c36d78397947f4c4eefbf97c7b945ee949df3
IEDL.DBID	RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount	143
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000343048900026&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0364-2313 1432-2323
IngestDate	Sun Nov 09 11:59:45 EST 2025 Thu Nov 06 22:18:10 EST 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:10:14 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:34:55 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:41:07 EST 2025 Wed Aug 20 07:27:19 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:31:59 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	11
Keywords	Short Operative Time Future Remnant Liver Cirrhotic Patient Laparoscopic Liver Resection Liver Resection
Language	English
License	http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5589-8f9600f86db81210bb2dbed8e4f7c36d78397947f4c4eefbf97c7b945ee949df3
Notes	ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 content type line 23
PMID	24912628
PQID	1601598874
PQPubID	47185
PageCount	8
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_1609309028 proquest_journals_1601598874 pubmed_primary_24912628 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_014_2659_z crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00268_014_2659_z wiley_primary_10_1007_s00268_014_2659_z_WJSBF07059 springer_journals_10_1007_s00268_014_2659_z
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	November 2014
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2014-11-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 11 year: 2014 text: November 2014
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	Boston
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Boston – name: United States – name: Hoboken
PublicationSubtitle	Official Journal of the International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie
PublicationTitle	World journal of surgery
PublicationTitleAbbrev	World J Surg
PublicationTitleAlternate	World J Surg
PublicationYear	2014
Publisher	Springer US John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Publisher_xml	– name: Springer US – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
References	Bedossa, Poynard (CR12) 1996; 24 Regimbeau, Kianmanesh, Farges (CR17) 2002; 131 Cherqui, Laurent, Mocellin (CR21) 2009; 250 Rau, Buttler, Meyer (CR24) 1998; 45 Lang, Poon, Fan (CR26) 2003; 138 Dindo, Demartines, Clavien (CR15) 2004; 240 Parks, Kuo, Davis (CR2) 2014; 16 Cheung, Poon, Yuen (CR3) 2013; 257 Tranchart, Di Giuro, Lainas (CR6) 2010; 24 Lesurtel, Cherqui, Laurent (CR22) 2003; 196 Laurent, Cherqui, Lesurtel (CR4) 2003; 138 Descottes, Glineur, Lachachi (CR19) 2003; 17 Lai, Tang, Ha (CR10) 2009; 144 Cai, Yang, Yu (CR9) 2008; 22 Aldrighetti, Guzzetti, Pulitanò (CR7) 2010; 102 Pulitanò, Catena, Arru (CR27) 2008; 22 Vigano, Laurent, Tayar (CR18) 2009; 250 Chen, Juan, Ker (CR23) 2008; 15 Viganò, Tayar, Laurent (CR8) 2009; 16 Marks, Mouiel, Katkhouda (CR20) 1998; 12 Buell, Cherqui, Geller (CR30) 2009; 250 Edmondson, Steiner (CR16) 1954; 7 Sarpel, Hefti, Wisnievsky (CR11) 2009; 16 Santambrogio, Kluger, Costa (CR13) 2013; 15 Strasberg, Phillips (CR14) 2012; 257 Nguyen, Wallis Marsh, Tsung (CR29) 2011; 146 Nguyen, Gamblin, Geller (CR1) 2009; 250 Cherqui, Laurent, Tayar (CR25) 2006; 243 Belli, Fantini, D’Agostino (CR5) 2007; 21 Lee, Chong, Wong (CR28) 2011; 35 2011; 146 2013; 15 2003; 138 2010; 24 2002; 131 2004; 240 2010; 102 2014; 16 2009; 144 2008; 15 2013; 257 1954; 7 2003; 17 2011; 35 2009; 250 2008; 22 2012; 257 2007; 21 1996; 24 2009; 16 1998; 12 1998; 45 2006; 243 2003; 196 e_1_2_6_31_2 e_1_2_6_30_2 e_1_2_6_18_2 e_1_2_6_19_2 e_1_2_6_12_2 e_1_2_6_13_2 e_1_2_6_10_2 e_1_2_6_11_2 e_1_2_6_16_2 e_1_2_6_17_2 e_1_2_6_14_2 e_1_2_6_15_2 e_1_2_6_20_2 Rau HG (e_1_2_6_25_2) 1998; 45 e_1_2_6_8_2 e_1_2_6_7_2 e_1_2_6_9_2 e_1_2_6_29_2 e_1_2_6_4_2 e_1_2_6_3_2 e_1_2_6_6_2 e_1_2_6_5_2 e_1_2_6_24_2 e_1_2_6_23_2 e_1_2_6_2_2 e_1_2_6_22_2 e_1_2_6_21_2 e_1_2_6_28_2 e_1_2_6_27_2 e_1_2_6_26_2 14609868 - Arch Surg. 2003 Nov;138(11):1207-13 13160935 - Cancer. 1954 May;7(3):462-503 19495556 - J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):410-21 21842300 - World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2268-74 15273542 - Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13 18622563 - Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2196-200 11894036 - Surgery. 2002 Mar;131(3):311-7 8690394 - Hepatology. 1996 Aug;24(2):289-93 21079109 - Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):348-56 23672270 - HPB (Oxford). 2014 Feb;16(2):109-18 19801926 - Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):772-82 18297354 - Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2350-6 19801936 - Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):831-41 19259738 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1572-7 19916210 - Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30 16552201 - Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):499-506 12595052 - J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Feb;196(2):236-42 23299521 - Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):506-11 9951918 - Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Nov-Dec;45(24):2333-8 19221325 - Arch Surg. 2009 Feb;144(2):143-7; discussion 148 12364994 - Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):23-30 19915908 - Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1170-6 23216782 - HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jan;15(1):78-84 9543523 - Surg Endosc. 1998 Apr;12(4):331-4 20578084 - J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;102(1):82-6 18165879 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar;15(3):800-6 19801927 - Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):738-46 12860758 - Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):763-9; discussion 769 17705086 - Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):2004-11 22895397 - Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):377-82
References_xml	– volume: 16 start-page: 109 issue: 2 year: 2014 end-page: 118 ident: CR2 article-title: Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta-analysis of long-term outcome publication-title: HPB (Oxford) doi: 10.1111/hpb.12117 – volume: 250 start-page: 738 year: 2009 end-page: 746 ident: CR21 article-title: Liver resection for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term survival and role of secondary liver transplantation publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd582b – volume: 250 start-page: 825 issue: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 830 ident: CR30 article-title: The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b3b2d8 – volume: 243 start-page: 499 year: 2006 end-page: 506 ident: CR25 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000206017.29651.99 – volume: 144 start-page: 143 year: 2009 end-page: 147 ident: CR10 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: ten-year experience in a single center publication-title: Arch Surg doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.536 – volume: 257 start-page: 377 year: 2012 end-page: 382 ident: CR14 article-title: Use and dissemination of the Brisbane 2000 Nomenclature of Liver Anatomy and Resections publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825a01f6 – volume: 131 start-page: 311 year: 2002 end-page: 317 ident: CR17 article-title: Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma publication-title: Surgery doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.121892 – volume: 250 start-page: 772 year: 2009 end-page: 782 ident: CR18 article-title: The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd93b2 – volume: 146 start-page: 348 year: 2011 end-page: 356 ident: CR29 article-title: Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection publication-title: Arch Surg doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.248 – volume: 16 start-page: 410 year: 2009 end-page: 421 ident: CR8 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0120-8 – volume: 240 start-page: 205 year: 2004 end-page: 213 ident: CR15 article-title: Classification of surgical complications publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae – volume: 7 start-page: 462 year: 1954 end-page: 503 ident: CR16 article-title: Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO;2-E – volume: 196 start-page: 236 issue: 2 year: 2003 end-page: 242 ident: CR22 article-title: Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case–control study publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01622-8 – volume: 15 start-page: 800 year: 2008 end-page: 806 ident: CR23 article-title: Laparoscopic liver surgery for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9749-1 – volume: 17 start-page: 23 year: 2003 end-page: 30 ident: CR19 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9047-8 – volume: 45 start-page: 2333 issue: 24 year: 1998 end-page: 2338 ident: CR24 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy: a prospective analysis publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology – volume: 15 start-page: 78 year: 2013 end-page: 84 ident: CR13 article-title: Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child-Pugh’s A cirrhosis: is clinical evidence of portal hypertension a contraindication? publication-title: HPB (Oxford) doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00594.x – volume: 22 start-page: 2350 year: 2008 end-page: 2356 ident: CR9 article-title: Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9789-z – volume: 138 start-page: 763 year: 2003 end-page: 769 ident: CR4 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease publication-title: Arch Surg doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.763 – volume: 21 start-page: 2004 year: 2007 end-page: 2011 ident: CR5 article-title: Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9503-6 – volume: 12 start-page: 331 year: 1998 end-page: 334 ident: CR20 article-title: Laparoscopic liver surgery. A report on 28 patients publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s004649900664 – volume: 24 start-page: 1170 year: 2010 end-page: 1176 ident: CR6 article-title: Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3 – volume: 250 start-page: 831 year: 2009 end-page: 841 ident: CR1 article-title: World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df – volume: 35 start-page: 2268 year: 2011 end-page: 2274 ident: CR28 article-title: Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis publication-title: World J Surg doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1212-6 – volume: 257 start-page: 506 year: 2013 end-page: 511 ident: CR3 article-title: Long-term survival analysis of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a single-center experience publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b947a – volume: 24 start-page: 289 year: 1996 end-page: 293 ident: CR12 article-title: An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group publication-title: Hepatology doi: 10.1002/hep.510240201 – volume: 138 start-page: 1207 year: 2003 end-page: 1213 ident: CR26 article-title: Perioperative and long-term outcome of major hepatic resection for small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis publication-title: Arch Surg doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1207 – volume: 102 start-page: 82 year: 2010 end-page: 86 ident: CR7 article-title: Case-matched analysis of totally laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC: short and middle term results publication-title: J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1002/jso.21541 – volume: 22 start-page: 2196 year: 2008 end-page: 2200 ident: CR27 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection without portal clamping: a prospective evaluation publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0022-x – volume: 16 start-page: 1572 year: 2009 end-page: 1577 ident: CR11 article-title: Outcome for patients treated with laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched analysis publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0414-8 – volume: 21 start-page: 2004 year: 2007 end-page: 2011 article-title: Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short‐ and middle‐term results publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 102 start-page: 82 year: 2010 end-page: 86 article-title: Case‐matched analysis of totally laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC: short and middle term results publication-title: J Surg Oncol – volume: 144 start-page: 143 year: 2009 end-page: 147 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: ten‐year experience in a single center publication-title: Arch Surg – volume: 250 start-page: 772 year: 2009 end-page: 782 article-title: The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 138 start-page: 1207 year: 2003 end-page: 1213 article-title: Perioperative and long‐term outcome of major hepatic resection for small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis publication-title: Arch Surg – volume: 146 start-page: 348 year: 2011 end-page: 356 article-title: Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection publication-title: Arch Surg – volume: 22 start-page: 2350 year: 2008 end-page: 2356 article-title: Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 17 start-page: 23 year: 2003 end-page: 30 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 45 start-page: 2333 issue: 24 year: 1998 end-page: 2338 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy: a prospective analysis publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology – volume: 16 start-page: 109 issue: 2 year: 2014 end-page: 118 article-title: Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta‐analysis of long‐term outcome publication-title: HPB (Oxford) – volume: 250 start-page: 831 year: 2009 end-page: 841 article-title: World review of laparoscopic liver resection‐2,804 patients publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 12 start-page: 331 year: 1998 end-page: 334 article-title: Laparoscopic liver surgery. A report on 28 patients publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 240 start-page: 205 year: 2004 end-page: 213 article-title: Classification of surgical complications publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 22 start-page: 2196 year: 2008 end-page: 2200 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection without portal clamping: a prospective evaluation publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 24 start-page: 289 year: 1996 end-page: 293 article-title: An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group publication-title: Hepatology – volume: 131 start-page: 311 year: 2002 end-page: 317 article-title: Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma publication-title: Surgery – volume: 250 start-page: 825 issue: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 830 article-title: The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 250 start-page: 738 year: 2009 end-page: 746 article-title: Liver resection for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma: long‐term survival and role of secondary liver transplantation publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 15 start-page: 800 year: 2008 end-page: 806 article-title: Laparoscopic liver surgery for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol – volume: 35 start-page: 2268 year: 2011 end-page: 2274 article-title: Long‐term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case‐matched analysis publication-title: World J Surg – volume: 257 start-page: 377 year: 2012 end-page: 382 article-title: Use and dissemination of the Brisbane 2000 Nomenclature of Liver Anatomy and Resections publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 243 start-page: 499 year: 2006 end-page: 506 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 7 start-page: 462 year: 1954 end-page: 503 article-title: Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies publication-title: Cancer – volume: 138 start-page: 763 year: 2003 end-page: 769 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease publication-title: Arch Surg – volume: 16 start-page: 1572 year: 2009 end-page: 1577 article-title: Outcome for patients treated with laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: case‐matched analysis publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol – volume: 196 start-page: 236 issue: 2 year: 2003 end-page: 242 article-title: Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case–control study publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – volume: 257 start-page: 506 year: 2013 end-page: 511 article-title: Long‐term survival analysis of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a single‐center experience publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 15 start-page: 78 year: 2013 end-page: 84 article-title: Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child‐Pugh’s A cirrhosis: is clinical evidence of portal hypertension a contraindication? publication-title: HPB (Oxford) – volume: 24 start-page: 1170 year: 2010 end-page: 1176 article-title: Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched‐pair comparative study publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 16 start-page: 410 year: 2009 end-page: 421 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg – ident: e_1_2_6_3_2 doi: 10.1111/hpb.12117 – volume: 45 start-page: 2333 issue: 24 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_6_25_2 article-title: Laparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy: a prospective analysis publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology – ident: e_1_2_6_8_2 doi: 10.1002/jso.21541 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_2 doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000206017.29651.99 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_2 doi: 10.1007/s004649900664 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_2 doi: 10.1245/s10434‐009‐0414‐8 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_2 doi: 10.1002/hep.510240201 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_2 doi: 10.1007/s00268‐011‐1212‐6 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_2 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825a01f6 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_2 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd93b2 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_2 doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae – ident: e_1_2_6_24_2 doi: 10.1245/s10434‐007‐9749‐1 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_2 doi: 10.1007/s00464‐002‐9047‐8 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_2 doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.248 – ident: e_1_2_6_28_2 doi: 10.1007/s00464‐008‐0022‐x – ident: e_1_2_6_2_2 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df – ident: e_1_2_6_5_2 doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.763 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_2 doi: 10.1007/s00534‐009‐0120‐8 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1477‐2574.2012.00594.x – ident: e_1_2_6_22_2 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd582b – ident: e_1_2_6_23_2 doi: 10.1016/S1072‐7515(02)01622‐8 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_2 doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1207 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_2 doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.536 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_2 doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.121892 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_2 doi: 10.1007/s00464‐008‐9789‐z – ident: e_1_2_6_6_2 doi: 10.1007/s00464‐007‐9503‐6 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_2 doi: 10.1002/1097‐0142(195405)7:3<462::AID‐CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO;2‐E – ident: e_1_2_6_7_2 doi: 10.1007/s00464‐009‐0745‐3 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_2 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b3b2d8 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_2 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b947a – reference: 22895397 - Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):377-82 – reference: 19801927 - Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):738-46 – reference: 14609868 - Arch Surg. 2003 Nov;138(11):1207-13 – reference: 8690394 - Hepatology. 1996 Aug;24(2):289-93 – reference: 19221325 - Arch Surg. 2009 Feb;144(2):143-7; discussion 148 – reference: 15273542 - Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13 – reference: 19801936 - Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):831-41 – reference: 18622563 - Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2196-200 – reference: 12595052 - J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Feb;196(2):236-42 – reference: 23672270 - HPB (Oxford). 2014 Feb;16(2):109-18 – reference: 9543523 - Surg Endosc. 1998 Apr;12(4):331-4 – reference: 19495556 - J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):410-21 – reference: 12860758 - Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):763-9; discussion 769 – reference: 21842300 - World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2268-74 – reference: 19916210 - Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30 – reference: 19259738 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1572-7 – reference: 18165879 - Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar;15(3):800-6 – reference: 20578084 - J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;102(1):82-6 – reference: 23216782 - HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jan;15(1):78-84 – reference: 16552201 - Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):499-506 – reference: 19801926 - Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):772-82 – reference: 9951918 - Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Nov-Dec;45(24):2333-8 – reference: 23299521 - Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):506-11 – reference: 11894036 - Surgery. 2002 Mar;131(3):311-7 – reference: 17705086 - Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):2004-11 – reference: 13160935 - Cancer. 1954 May;7(3):462-503 – reference: 21079109 - Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):348-56 – reference: 12364994 - Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):23-30 – reference: 18297354 - Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2350-6 – reference: 19915908 - Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1170-6
SSID	ssj0017606
Score	2.4964247
Snippet	Background Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic... Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in...
SourceID	proquest pubmed crossref wiley springer
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	2919
SubjectTerms	Abdominal Surgery Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery Cardiac Surgery Cirrhotic Patient Disease-Free Survival Female Future Remnant Liver General Surgery Hepatectomy - methods Humans Laparoscopic Liver Resection Laparoscopy Length of Stay Liver Cirrhosis - complications Liver Cirrhosis - surgery Liver Neoplasms - complications Liver Neoplasms - surgery Liver Resection Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Operative Time Postoperative Complications - etiology Retrospective Studies Short Operative Time Surgery Survival Rate Thoracic Surgery Vascular Surgery
SummonAdditionalLinks	– databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection (NC LIVE) dbid: 7X7 link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwELYK5cClD9HHUlq5EqdWbjeJn1wQXbFCFUJItOreosQPddU2WTYLUvn1nXEeBaHCoedxHCcz45nxfJ4hZFeKQpZFhsUHUwhQnC2Ydt6wLJjEpVxDzFHEZhPq5ETPZua0O3BrOlhlvyfGjdrVFs_IPyYQOQgDKsH3F-cMu0ZhdrVrobFGHmLbbJRzNRsCrkTJcZer5Az8mKzPao5jEdFUIowLKFIYdnXTLt1yNq8lSm-6sdEOTR__7xc8IY86D5QetCLzlDzw1Rb5cQxGEwtb1ou5pZfNB4pIE3qMqA2K6Lx4_YGCh0uPwICtajzwRwQrnWAzoqr-VdA60Ml8ufxew8Ttk3v0AOiNZ5MWEE8Rtfj7Gfk6PfwyOWJdHwZmhdCG6QBhzjho6UqN9cbKMnWld9rzoGwmndKYHOQqcMu9D2UwyqrScOG94caF7DlZr-rKvyTUBiG9TqzIAsQxKYT12mfCGodX_bSyIzLuuZDbrkg59sr4mQ_llSPjcmBcjozLr0bk3fDIoq3QcdfgnZ43eaesTf6XMSPydiCDmuGvLCpfX8QxJkMMqx6RF61IDG-DCDZJJVLe9zJybfJ_LyWNYnT_ovNvn88-TWFvFmb77vW_IpspinS8K7lD1lfLC_-abNjL1bxZvonK8QeUChHB priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest
Title	Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Cirrhotic Liver: A Case–Control Study
URI	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-014-2659-z https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1007%2Fs00268-014-2659-z https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24912628 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1601598874 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1609309028
Volume	38
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000343048900026&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1432-2323 dateEnd: 20231231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017606 issn: 0364-2313 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1432-2323 dateEnd: 20231231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017606 issn: 0364-2313 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1432-2323 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017606 issn: 0364-2313 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB4VqCou9AlsS1eu1FOrVJvYju3eYMUKVXSFoI-9RYkf6kolQZsFCU78h_7D_pJ6nIdAfam95OLHWOOxx5P5ZgbgZcrztMgpJh9MvIFidB5JY1VEnYpNwqS3OfJQbEJMp3I2U0dtHHfdod07l2S4qftgNzQXEHjFoiTlKrpagTWv7STWazg--dS7DkQ6ah2UviONaefK_NUUt5XRTy_MG97R22_XoHwm9_9r2Q9go31rkt1GOB7CHVs-gnvvW2_6Yzg99JoSs1lWZ3NNLuo3BOEl5BChGgQheSHmgfhnLTnwWmtZ4V9-hK2SMVYgKqvTnFSOjOeLxZfK02hGviW7vr2236-_jRscPEGw4uUT-DjZ_zA-iNryC5HmXKpIOm_djJxMTSExzVhRJKawRlrmhKapERJ9gkw4ppm1rnBKaFEoxq1VTBlHN2G1rEq7DUQ7nloZa06dN18Sb81LS7lWBiP8pNADGHX7kOk2NzmWyPia9VmVAxszz8YM2ZhdDeBVP-SsSczxp8473eZm7Rmts9jbohzJswG86Jv96UJm5qWtzkMfRRG6Kgew1QhFT80brnGSYsvrbudvTP77pSRBkP6-6Ozzu5O9ib-SuXr6TySewXqC8hYiJndgdbk4t8_hrr5YzuvFEFbETISvHMLa3v706HgYTtAPLaMQbg
linkProvider	Springer Nature
linkToHtml	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwELZKQaKXFsRraQEjwQUU2DhxbCMhVBZWW7qskChibyHxQ10ByXazLWp_FL-RGedBK0Q59cDZjuPYn8czmW9mCHmU8CzJswiTDzIwUIzOAmmsCiKnQsNiCTZH5otNiMlETqfqwwr52cbCIK2ylYleUJtS4z_y5yFYDlzBkYhfzQ8CrBqF3tW2hEYNi117_ANMturlzhvY38eMDd_uDUZBU1Ug0JxLFUgHSnvfycTkErNn5TkzuTXSxk7oKDFCoqsrFi7WsbUud0pokauYW6tiZVwE414il0GOCzT2xLQz8EKR9BvfaByA3hS1XtS-T1rKEqSNQUvCVXBy9h78Q7k95Zg9qzb7e2-48b-t2DWy3mjYdLs-EtfJii1ukK9jUAowcWc5n2l6VD2jyKShY2SlUGQf-vAOCho8HcEFvSzRoYEMXTrAYktF-T2jpaOD2WKxX8LA9ZMv6Da0VzYY1IR_iqzM45vk04V83y2yWpSFvUOodjyxMtQ8cmCnMZszaSOulcFQRil0j_TbXU91k4Qda4F8S7v00R4oKQAlRaCkJz3ypHtkXmcgOa_zVouFtBFGVfobCD3ysGsGMYJLmRW2PPR9VIQcXdkjt2sIdm8DCz1kCbY8bTF5avC_T4V52P570unndx9fD-Hu4eru-fN_QK6O9t6P0_HOZHeTrDE8Tj4udIusLheH9h65oo-Ws2px3x9MSr5cNK5_AUGxcBw
linkToPdf	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9NAEB6VFCFeOMQVKLBI8AIyTda79i4SQm3aqKVRFHGofTP2HiIC7JCkRe1P49cx44tWiPLUB5738Hr9ze6M55sZgKeRTKMsDSn5IEcDxZo0UNbpIPS6b7lQaHOkZbGJeDxWBwd6sgI_m1gYolU2Z2J5UNvC0D_y9T5aDlKjSIh1X9MiJlvDN7PvAVWQIk9rU06jgsieO_6B5tvi9e4WfutnnA-3Pwx2grrCQGCkVDpQHhX4nleRzRRl0soybjNnlRM-NmFkY0VuLxF7YYRzPvM6NnGmhXROC219iPNegtUYlQzRgdXN7fHkXevDiKNe7SkVAWpRYeNT7ZUpTHlEJDJsiaQOTs7ein-ouqfctGeV6PIWHF7_n_fvBlyrdW-2UQnLTVhx-S34MkJ1gVJ6FrOpYUeLl4w4NmxEfBVGvMQy8IOhbs928OpeFuTqIO4uG1AZprz4lrLCs8F0Pv9c4MTVyFdsA9sXLhhUoQCM-JrHt-HjhbzfHejkRe7uATNeRk71jQw9WnDcZVy5UBptKchRxaYLvQYBianTs1OVkK9Jm1i6BE2CoEkINMlJF563Q2ZVbpLzOq81uEjqY2qR_AZFF560zXjA0FamuSsOyz46JPau6sLdCo7t09B27_OIWl40-Dw1-d-XwksI_3vRyf7b95tDvJWkvn_--h_DFYRzMtod7z2Aq5wkqwwYXYPOcn7oHsJlc7ScLuaPaill8Omigf0LCAp6PA
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic+vs.+Open+Liver+Resection+for+Hepatocellular+Carcinoma+of+Cirrhotic+Liver%3A+A+Case%E2%80%93Control+Study&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Memeo%2C+Riccardo&rft.au=de%E2%80%99Angelis%2C+Nicola&rft.au=Compagnon%2C+Philippe&rft.au=Salloum%2C+Chady&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.pub=Springer+US&rft.issn=0364-2313&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2919&rft.epage=2926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00268-014-2659-z&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00268_014_2659_z
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon