GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence

To provide guidance on how systematic review authors, guideline developers, and health technology assessment practitioners should approach the use of the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool as a part of GRADE's certainty rating process. The study design and se...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of clinical epidemiology Vol. 111; pp. 105 - 114
Main Authors:	Schünemann, Holger J., Cuello, Carlos, Akl, Elie A., Mustafa, Reem A., Meerpohl, Jörg J., Thayer, Kris, Morgan, Rebecca L., Gartlehner, Gerald, Kunz, Regina, Katikireddi, S Vittal, Sterne, Jonathan, Higgins, Julian PT, Guyatt, Gordon
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2019 Elsevier Limited
Subjects:	Bias Certainty of the evidence Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic - standards Decision making Design Domains Dose-response effects Epidemiology Evidence-Based Medicine - methods Evidence-Based Medicine - standards GRADE Humans Internal Medicine Nonrandomized studies Observational Studies as Topic - standards Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Quality Quality of evidence Risk Assessment Risk Factors Risk of bias ROBINS Studies Systematic Reviews as Topic Technology assessment Uncertainty Working groups GRADE Risk of bias ROBINS Quality of evidence Nonrandomized studies Certainty of the evidence
ISSN:	0895-4356, 1878-5921, 1878-5921
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Be the first to leave a comment!