The fate of research abstracts submitted to a national surgical conference: a cross-sectional study to assess scientific impact

Conference abstracts often lack rigorous peer review, but potentially influence clinical thinking and practice. To evaluate the quality of abstracts submitted to a large surgical conference, presentation and publication rates were investigated to assess scientific impact. A Cross-sectional study of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The American journal of surgery Jg. 211; H. 1; S. 166 - 171
Hauptverfasser:	de Meijer, Vincent E., Knops, Simon P., van Dongen, Joris A., Eyck, Ben M., Vles, Wouter J.
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2016 Elsevier Limited
Schlagworte:	5-Year abstract-to-publication ratio Abstracting and Indexing as Topic - statistics & numerical data Algorithms Authorship Bibliometrics Conferences Confidence intervals Congresses as Topic Cross-Sectional Studies Gastrointestinal surgery General Surgery Humans Impact factors Journal Impact Factor Kaplan-Meier Estimate Meetings Netherlands Proportional Hazards Models Publication bias Publication rate Publishing - statistics & numerical data Quality Research abstract Scientific conference Societies, Medical Software Studies Surgery Surgical research Survival analysis Vascular surgery Netherlands Research abstract Surgical research Publication bias 5-Year abstract-to-publication ratio Scientific conference Publication rate
ISSN:	0002-9610, 1879-1883, 1879-1883
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!