Parsing the Behavioral and Brain Mechanisms of Third-Party Punishment

The evolved capacity for third-party punishment is considered crucial to the emergence and maintenance of elaborate human social organization and is central to the modern provision of fairness and justice within society. Although it is well established that the mental state of the offender and the s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of neuroscience Jg. 36; H. 36; S. 9420 - 9434
Hauptverfasser: Ginther, Matthew R, Bonnie, Richard J, Hoffman, Morris B, Shen, Francis X, Simons, Kenneth W, Jones, Owen D, Marois, René
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 07.09.2016
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1529-2401
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract The evolved capacity for third-party punishment is considered crucial to the emergence and maintenance of elaborate human social organization and is central to the modern provision of fairness and justice within society. Although it is well established that the mental state of the offender and the severity of the harm he caused are the two primary predictors of punishment decisions, the precise cognitive and brain mechanisms by which these distinct components are evaluated and integrated into a punishment decision are poorly understood. Using fMRI, here we implement a novel experimental design to functionally dissociate the mechanisms underlying evaluation, integration, and decision that were conflated in previous studies of third-party punishment. Behaviorally, the punishment decision is primarily defined by a superadditive interaction between harm and mental state, with subjects weighing the interaction factor more than the single factors of harm and mental state. On a neural level, evaluation of harms engaged brain areas associated with affective and somatosensory processing, whereas mental state evaluation primarily recruited circuitry involved in mentalization. Harm and mental state evaluations are integrated in medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate structures, with the amygdala acting as a pivotal hub of the interaction between harm and mental state. This integrated information is used by the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at the time of the decision to assign an appropriate punishment through a distributed coding system. Together, these findings provide a blueprint of the brain mechanisms by which neutral third parties render punishment decisions. Punishment undergirds large-scale cooperation and helps dispense criminal justice. Yet it is currently unknown precisely how people assess the mental states of offenders, evaluate the harms they caused, and integrate those two components into a single punishment decision. Using a new design, we isolated these three processes, identifying the distinct brain systems and activities that enable each. Additional findings suggest that the amygdala plays a crucial role in mediating the interaction of mental state and harm information, whereas the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a crucial, final-stage role, both in integrating mental state and harm information and in selecting a suitable punishment amount. These findings deepen our understanding of how punishment decisions are made, which may someday help to improve them.
AbstractList UNLABELLEDThe evolved capacity for third-party punishment is considered crucial to the emergence and maintenance of elaborate human social organization and is central to the modern provision of fairness and justice within society. Although it is well established that the mental state of the offender and the severity of the harm he caused are the two primary predictors of punishment decisions, the precise cognitive and brain mechanisms by which these distinct components are evaluated and integrated into a punishment decision are poorly understood. Using fMRI, here we implement a novel experimental design to functionally dissociate the mechanisms underlying evaluation, integration, and decision that were conflated in previous studies of third-party punishment. Behaviorally, the punishment decision is primarily defined by a superadditive interaction between harm and mental state, with subjects weighing the interaction factor more than the single factors of harm and mental state. On a neural level, evaluation of harms engaged brain areas associated with affective and somatosensory processing, whereas mental state evaluation primarily recruited circuitry involved in mentalization. Harm and mental state evaluations are integrated in medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate structures, with the amygdala acting as a pivotal hub of the interaction between harm and mental state. This integrated information is used by the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at the time of the decision to assign an appropriate punishment through a distributed coding system. Together, these findings provide a blueprint of the brain mechanisms by which neutral third parties render punishment decisions.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTPunishment undergirds large-scale cooperation and helps dispense criminal justice. Yet it is currently unknown precisely how people assess the mental states of offenders, evaluate the harms they caused, and integrate those two components into a single punishment decision. Using a new design, we isolated these three processes, identifying the distinct brain systems and activities that enable each. Additional findings suggest that the amygdala plays a crucial role in mediating the interaction of mental state and harm information, whereas the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a crucial, final-stage role, both in integrating mental state and harm information and in selecting a suitable punishment amount. These findings deepen our understanding of how punishment decisions are made, which may someday help to improve them.
The evolved capacity for third-party punishment is considered crucial to the emergence and maintenance of elaborate human social organization and is central to the modern provision of fairness and justice within society. Although it is well established that the mental state of the offender and the severity of the harm he caused are the two primary predictors of punishment decisions, the precise cognitive and brain mechanisms by which these distinct components are evaluated and integrated into a punishment decision are poorly understood. Using fMRI, here we implement a novel experimental design to functionally dissociate the mechanisms underlying evaluation, integration, and decision that were conflated in previous studies of third-party punishment. Behaviorally, the punishment decision is primarily defined by a superadditive interaction between harm and mental state, with subjects weighing the interaction factor more than the single factors of harm and mental state. On a neural level, evaluation of harms engaged brain areas associated with affective and somatosensory processing, whereas mental state evaluation primarily recruited circuitry involved in mentalization. Harm and mental state evaluations are integrated in medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate structures, with the amygdala acting as a pivotal hub of the interaction between harm and mental state. This integrated information is used by the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at the time of the decision to assign an appropriate punishment through a distributed coding system. Together, these findings provide a blueprint of the brain mechanisms by which neutral third parties render punishment decisions. Punishment undergirds large-scale cooperation and helps dispense criminal justice. Yet it is currently unknown precisely how people assess the mental states of offenders, evaluate the harms they caused, and integrate those two components into a single punishment decision. Using a new design, we isolated these three processes, identifying the distinct brain systems and activities that enable each. Additional findings suggest that the amygdala plays a crucial role in mediating the interaction of mental state and harm information, whereas the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a crucial, final-stage role, both in integrating mental state and harm information and in selecting a suitable punishment amount. These findings deepen our understanding of how punishment decisions are made, which may someday help to improve them.
Author Marois, René
Ginther, Matthew R
Bonnie, Richard J
Shen, Francis X
Jones, Owen D
Simons, Kenneth W
Hoffman, Morris B
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Matthew R
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8109-0914
  surname: Ginther
  fullname: Ginther, Matthew R
  email: ginther@gmail.com, owen.jones@vanderbilt.edu, ginther@gmail.com, rene.marois@vanderbilt.edu
  organization: Neuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, Vanderbilt Law School, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, ginther@gmail.com owen.jones@vanderbilt.edu ginther@gmail.com rene.marois@vanderbilt.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Richard J
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2945-7699
  surname: Bonnie
  fullname: Bonnie, Richard J
  organization: Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Morris B
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2200-2010
  surname: Hoffman
  fullname: Hoffman, Morris B
  organization: District Judge, Second Judicial District (Denver), State of Colorado, Denver, Colorado 80202
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Francis X
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9029-1686
  surname: Shen
  fullname: Shen, Francis X
  organization: Department of Law, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kenneth W
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2516-7379
  surname: Simons
  fullname: Simons, Kenneth W
  organization: Department of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law, Irvine, California 92697
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Owen D
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9649-1005
  surname: Jones
  fullname: Jones, Owen D
  email: ginther@gmail.com, owen.jones@vanderbilt.edu, ginther@gmail.com, rene.marois@vanderbilt.edu
  organization: Vanderbilt Law School, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, Departments of Law and Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, Director, MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, and ginther@gmail.com owen.jones@vanderbilt.edu ginther@gmail.com rene.marois@vanderbilt.edu
– sequence: 7
  givenname: René
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2998-4712
  surname: Marois
  fullname: Marois, René
  email: ginther@gmail.com, owen.jones@vanderbilt.edu, ginther@gmail.com, rene.marois@vanderbilt.edu
  organization: Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, and Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240 ginther@gmail.com owen.jones@vanderbilt.edu ginther@gmail.com rene.marois@vanderbilt.edu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27605616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1j8tOwzAURC0Eog_4hcpLNin2tePES1oVKCq0gnYd3cQOCUqcEidI_XsiUVYjzZwZaSbk0jXOEjLjbM5DEPcvb6vD-_ZjuZ5LqXXAwzkwri7IeEh1AJLxEZl4_8UYixiPrskIIsVCxdWYrHbY-tJ90q6wdGEL_CmbFiuKztBFi6WjrzYr0JW-9rTJ6b4oWxMMpe5Ed_1gF7V13Q25yrHy9vasU3J4XO2Xz8Fm-7RePmyCLJTQBSg0QpjZLMqN0SbWLAILoeRRDqgjQGFxIJhUKQulMAKY4jLToPM0TjWHKbn72z22zXdvfZfUpc9sVaGzTe8THvNYCCU1DOjsjPZpbU1ybMsa21Pyfx1-AfG6W4c
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhae497
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2019_03_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2022_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2019_107722
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_93908_z
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2500730122
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsac057
crossref_primary_10_1111_tops_12382
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12264_021_00808_3
crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awy064
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_803184
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1242_17_2018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2019_01_020
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_49239_1
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2017_00587
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2021_118730
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep45967
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joep_2023_102675
crossref_primary_10_1017_ajil_2017_97
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_48649_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socec_2022_101872
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2023_120468
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainresbull_2024_111082
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2025_111988
crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_25648
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2017_00647
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2025_108640
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_021_01064_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_05299_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2025_121133
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2017_00374
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11682_021_00555_z
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41386_021_01092_5
crossref_primary_10_1177_0146167220965306
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10548_023_01029_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pscychresns_2022_111528
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2017_00512
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2023_105525
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2024_120613
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_019_00711_5
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_021_00927_4
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2016 Ginther et al.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2016 Ginther et al.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4499-15.2016
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1529-2401
EndPage 9434
ExternalDocumentID 27605616
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
18M
2WC
34G
39C
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAFWJ
AAJMC
ABBAR
ABIVO
ACGUR
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADCOW
ADHGD
AENEX
AFCFT
AFOSN
AFSQR
AHWXS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BTFSW
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
F5P
GX1
H13
HYE
H~9
KQ8
L7B
NPM
OK1
P0W
P2P
QZG
R.V
RHI
RPM
TFN
TR2
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
XJT
YBU
YHG
YKV
YNH
YSK
7X8
ABUFD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-a39a25cec7fdd9d89072e25417f2a972a3ea9a2046b0543d320614c929fb8b912
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 53
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000384006300015&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 14:02:43 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:53:48 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 36
Keywords fMRI
punishment
law
harm
decision-making
mental state
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 Ginther et al.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c542t-a39a25cec7fdd9d89072e25417f2a972a3ea9a2046b0543d320614c929fb8b912
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-2516-7379
0000-0003-2945-7699
0000-0002-2200-2010
0000-0003-2998-4712
0000-0002-9649-1005
0000-0001-8109-0914
0000-0002-9029-1686
OpenAccessLink https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1872272492578087552
PMID 27605616
PQID 1818336492
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1818336492
pubmed_primary_27605616
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-09-07
20160907
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-09-07
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-09-07
  day: 07
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The Journal of neuroscience
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurosci
PublicationYear 2016
References 28706474 - Front Neurosci. 2017 Jun 29;11:374
References_xml – reference: 28706474 - Front Neurosci. 2017 Jun 29;11:374
SSID ssj0007017
Score 2.4570086
Snippet The evolved capacity for third-party punishment is considered crucial to the emergence and maintenance of elaborate human social organization and is central to...
UNLABELLEDThe evolved capacity for third-party punishment is considered crucial to the emergence and maintenance of elaborate human social organization and is...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 9420
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping
Decision Making - physiology
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Oxygen - blood
Punishment - psychology
Theory of Mind - physiology
Time Factors
Young Adult
Title Parsing the Behavioral and Brain Mechanisms of Third-Party Punishment
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27605616
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1818336492
Volume 36
WOSCitedRecordID wos000384006300015&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NS8MwFA_qPHjxa37MLyKIt7g1aZvkJHNsqLBScMJuI01StsPauU5h_70vXedOguClp6aU19eX3--938tD6K6V2kCbliDWcyPMFDMkUaElInRZD-Yr7pty2ASPIjEcyrhKuBWVrHIdE8tAbXLtcuRN2IkEY6Ev6ePsg7ipUa66Wo3Q2EY1BlDGSbr4cHNaOAd3q7qCgW81XyOnjnvrvDz4gPOJFzhlV_g7tCy3mN7Bf1_uEO1X4BK3V95whLZsdozq7QyI9XSJ73Ep9yzz6HXUjVWZJ8CAAPHTT7M-VpnBT25uBO5b1xU8KaYFzlM8GE_mhsCixRLHrgY-dnnFE_Te6w46z6SaqUB04NMFUUwqGmireWqMNAK4MbVAEj2eUiU5VcwquANYcwJgjhlGHWXUAKLSRCTSo6doJ8sze45wKj14imAqBNAluBEpUxCyrEws15rLBrpdG2sEPusKESqz-Wcx2pirgc5WFh_NVodrjCgPHakJL_6w-hLtuS9YSr74Faql8Mfaa7SrvxaTYn5TOgNco7j_DX28vz8
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parsing+the+Behavioral+and+Brain+Mechanisms+of+Third-Party+Punishment&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+neuroscience&rft.au=Ginther%2C+Matthew+R&rft.au=Bonnie%2C+Richard+J&rft.au=Hoffman%2C+Morris+B&rft.au=Shen%2C+Francis+X&rft.date=2016-09-07&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=36&rft.spage=9420&rft.epage=9434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523%2FJNEUROSCI.4499-15.2016&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT