Soil infiltration characteristics in alternate and conventional furrow irrigation using different estimation methods

Field data sets for seven irrigation events during maize growing season were collected for characterizing infiltration properties in variable Alternate, Fixed Alternate and Conventional Furrow Irrigation (AFI, FFI and CFI, respectively). Three various estimation methods; the two-point method and the...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Ročník 18; číslo 6; s. 1904 - 1911
Hlavní autor: Ebrahimian, Hamed
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Heidelberg Korean Society of Civil Engineers 01.09.2014
Springer Nature B.V
대한토목학회
Témata:
Civil Engineering
Engineering
Furrow irrigation
Furrows
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Growing season
Hydrologic data
Industrial Pollution Prevention
Infiltration
Infiltration rate
Irrigation
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Parameter modification
Parameters
Runoff
Seasons
Soil infiltration
Water Engineering
토목공학
alternate furrow irrigation
INFILT
infiltration
Two-point method
IPARM
ISSN:1226-7988, 1976-3808
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Field data sets for seven irrigation events during maize growing season were collected for characterizing infiltration properties in variable Alternate, Fixed Alternate and Conventional Furrow Irrigation (AFI, FFI and CFI, respectively). Three various estimation methods; the two-point method and the INFILT and IPARM models; were used to estimate the infiltration parameters of the modified Kostiakov equation for alternate and conventional furrows and then compared with field results. Less runoff losses and larger infiltration were observed in alternate furrows as compared to conventional furrows due to increased lateral water movement to non-irrigated furrow. AFI had somewhat greater infiltration rate than FFI. The steady infiltration rate in AFI and FFI was higher than in CFI. The IPARM model had the most accurate and reliable performance relative to others in three irrigation treatments. However the two-point method also performed well. The INFILT model was not suitable on the experimental field studied and highly overestimated the infiltration for all irrigation treatments. The results indicated that measuring both advance and runoff data is necessary to achieve reasonable and precise infiltration parameters. Having different infiltration characteristics in alternate furrows, design variables of alternate furrow irrigation will be different from conventional furrow irrigation in the same field.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
G704-000839.2014.18.6.011
ISSN:1226-7988
1976-3808
DOI:10.1007/s12205-014-1343-z