Interdicting a Nuclear-Weapons Project

A "proliferator" seeks to complete a first small batch of fission weapons as quickly as possible, whereas an "interdictor" wishes to delay that completion for as long as possible. We develop and solve a max-min model that identifies resource-limited interdiction actions that maxi...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Operations research Ročník 57; číslo 4; s. 866 - 877
Hlavní autoři: Brown, Gerald G, Carlyle, W. Matthew, Harney, Robert C, Skroch, Eric M, Wood, R. Kevin
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Hanover, MD INFORMS 01.07.2009
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Témata:
ISSN:0030-364X, 1526-5463
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:A "proliferator" seeks to complete a first small batch of fission weapons as quickly as possible, whereas an "interdictor" wishes to delay that completion for as long as possible. We develop and solve a max-min model that identifies resource-limited interdiction actions that maximally delay completion time of the proliferator's weapons project, given that the proliferator will observe any such actions and adjust his plans to minimize that time. The model incorporates a detailed project-management (critical path method) submodel, and standard optimization software solves the model in a few minutes on a personal computer. We exploit off-the-shelf project-management software to manage a database, control the optimization, and display results. Using a range of levels for interdiction effort, we analyze a published case study that models three alternate uranium-enrichment technologies. The task of "cascade loading" appears in all technologies and turns out to be an inherent fragility for the proliferator at all levels of interdiction effort. Such insights enable policy makers to quantify the effects of interdiction options at their disposal, be they diplomatic, economic, or military.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Case Study-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Report-2
ISSN:0030-364X
1526-5463
DOI:10.1287/opre.1080.0643