Receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed affect detection probability of acoustic telemetry transmitters in a Missouri River tributary

Background One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in environmental (i.e., wind and flow) and abiotic (i.e., bathymetry) conditions among aquatic systems can lead to differences in dete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal biotelemetry Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 1 - 6
Main Authors: Carlson, Tanner L., LaBrie, Lindsey A. P., Wesner, Jeff S., Chipps, Steven R., Coulter, Alison A., Schall, Benjamin J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London BioMed Central 13.02.2023
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Subjects:
ISSN:2050-3385, 2050-3385
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in environmental (i.e., wind and flow) and abiotic (i.e., bathymetry) conditions among aquatic systems can lead to differences in detection probability temporally or between systems. In this study we evaluate the effect of distance, receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed on detection probabilities of two models of acoustic transmitters in a mid-sized river. InnovaSea V16-6H (hereafter V16) and V13-1L (hereafter V13) tags were deployed in the James River, SD at 0.36 m (deep) and 2.29 m (V16 tag) or 1.98 m (V13 tag; shallow) above the benthic surface downstream of InnovaSea VR2W stationary receivers at distances of 100, 200, or 300 m. We used two receiver mount designs that included a fixed position within a PVC pipe on the downstream side of a bridge piling or a metal frame deployed in the middle of the river channel. Tags were deployed for 72 h at each location, and hourly detections were summarized. We evaluated downstream distance, receiver mount design, tag depth, and wind effects on tag detection using Bayesian logistic regression. Results Detection probability decreased as distance increased for all combinations of tag types and mount designs and varied from nearly 100% at 100 m to less than 10% at 300 m. The V16 transmitter had greater detection probability by the receiver mounted in the pipe than in the midriver frame. For both mounts, the deep V16 transmitter had greater detection probability than the V16 shallow transmitter. Detection probability of the V13 transmitter was similar between receiver mounts or transmitter depths. Wind speed had a negative impact on detection probabilities of both transmitter types and depths, except the deep V16 transmitter. Conclusions Deploying acoustic receivers in PVC pipes rather than midriver frames provided greater downstream detection probabilities for V16 transmitters under conditions evaluated in this study. In addition, V16 transmitters had greater detection probabilities when positioned deep within the water column rather than near the surface. We also demonstrated that wind speed can have a negative impact on detection probabilities.
AbstractList One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in environmental (i.e., wind and flow) and abiotic (i.e., bathymetry) conditions among aquatic systems can lead to differences in detection probability temporally or between systems. In this study we evaluate the effect of distance, receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed on detection probabilities of two models of acoustic transmitters in a mid-sized river. InnovaSea V16-6H (hereafter V16) and V13-1L (hereafter V13) tags were deployed in the James River, SD at 0.36 m (deep) and 2.29 m (V16 tag) or 1.98 m (V13 tag; shallow) above the benthic surface downstream of InnovaSea VR2W stationary receivers at distances of 100, 200, or 300 m. We used two receiver mount designs that included a fixed position within a PVC pipe on the downstream side of a bridge piling or a metal frame deployed in the middle of the river channel. Tags were deployed for 72 h at each location, and hourly detections were summarized. We evaluated downstream distance, receiver mount design, tag depth, and wind effects on tag detection using Bayesian logistic regression. Detection probability decreased as distance increased for all combinations of tag types and mount designs and varied from nearly 100% at 100 m to less than 10% at 300 m. The V16 transmitter had greater detection probability by the receiver mounted in the pipe than in the midriver frame. For both mounts, the deep V16 transmitter had greater detection probability than the V16 shallow transmitter. Detection probability of the V13 transmitter was similar between receiver mounts or transmitter depths. Wind speed had a negative impact on detection probabilities of both transmitter types and depths, except the deep V16 transmitter. Deploying acoustic receivers in PVC pipes rather than midriver frames provided greater downstream detection probabilities for V16 transmitters under conditions evaluated in this study. In addition, V16 transmitters had greater detection probabilities when positioned deep within the water column rather than near the surface. We also demonstrated that wind speed can have a negative impact on detection probabilities.
Abstract Background One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in environmental (i.e., wind and flow) and abiotic (i.e., bathymetry) conditions among aquatic systems can lead to differences in detection probability temporally or between systems. In this study we evaluate the effect of distance, receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed on detection probabilities of two models of acoustic transmitters in a mid-sized river. InnovaSea V16-6H (hereafter V16) and V13-1L (hereafter V13) tags were deployed in the James River, SD at 0.36 m (deep) and 2.29 m (V16 tag) or 1.98 m (V13 tag; shallow) above the benthic surface downstream of InnovaSea VR2W stationary receivers at distances of 100, 200, or 300 m. We used two receiver mount designs that included a fixed position within a PVC pipe on the downstream side of a bridge piling or a metal frame deployed in the middle of the river channel. Tags were deployed for 72 h at each location, and hourly detections were summarized. We evaluated downstream distance, receiver mount design, tag depth, and wind effects on tag detection using Bayesian logistic regression. Results Detection probability decreased as distance increased for all combinations of tag types and mount designs and varied from nearly 100% at 100 m to less than 10% at 300 m. The V16 transmitter had greater detection probability by the receiver mounted in the pipe than in the midriver frame. For both mounts, the deep V16 transmitter had greater detection probability than the V16 shallow transmitter. Detection probability of the V13 transmitter was similar between receiver mounts or transmitter depths. Wind speed had a negative impact on detection probabilities of both transmitter types and depths, except the deep V16 transmitter. Conclusions Deploying acoustic receivers in PVC pipes rather than midriver frames provided greater downstream detection probabilities for V16 transmitters under conditions evaluated in this study. In addition, V16 transmitters had greater detection probabilities when positioned deep within the water column rather than near the surface. We also demonstrated that wind speed can have a negative impact on detection probabilities.
Background One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in environmental (i.e., wind and flow) and abiotic (i.e., bathymetry) conditions among aquatic systems can lead to differences in detection probability temporally or between systems. In this study we evaluate the effect of distance, receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed on detection probabilities of two models of acoustic transmitters in a mid-sized river. InnovaSea V16-6H (hereafter V16) and V13-1L (hereafter V13) tags were deployed in the James River, SD at 0.36 m (deep) and 2.29 m (V16 tag) or 1.98 m (V13 tag; shallow) above the benthic surface downstream of InnovaSea VR2W stationary receivers at distances of 100, 200, or 300 m. We used two receiver mount designs that included a fixed position within a PVC pipe on the downstream side of a bridge piling or a metal frame deployed in the middle of the river channel. Tags were deployed for 72 h at each location, and hourly detections were summarized. We evaluated downstream distance, receiver mount design, tag depth, and wind effects on tag detection using Bayesian logistic regression. Results Detection probability decreased as distance increased for all combinations of tag types and mount designs and varied from nearly 100% at 100 m to less than 10% at 300 m. The V16 transmitter had greater detection probability by the receiver mounted in the pipe than in the midriver frame. For both mounts, the deep V16 transmitter had greater detection probability than the V16 shallow transmitter. Detection probability of the V13 transmitter was similar between receiver mounts or transmitter depths. Wind speed had a negative impact on detection probabilities of both transmitter types and depths, except the deep V16 transmitter. Conclusions Deploying acoustic receivers in PVC pipes rather than midriver frames provided greater downstream detection probabilities for V16 transmitters under conditions evaluated in this study. In addition, V16 transmitters had greater detection probabilities when positioned deep within the water column rather than near the surface. We also demonstrated that wind speed can have a negative impact on detection probabilities. Keywords: Acoustic telemetry, Wind, Stationary receiver, Depth, Distance, V16, V13
Background One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in environmental (i.e., wind and flow) and abiotic (i.e., bathymetry) conditions among aquatic systems can lead to differences in detection probability temporally or between systems. In this study we evaluate the effect of distance, receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed on detection probabilities of two models of acoustic transmitters in a mid-sized river. InnovaSea V16-6H (hereafter V16) and V13-1L (hereafter V13) tags were deployed in the James River, SD at 0.36 m (deep) and 2.29 m (V16 tag) or 1.98 m (V13 tag; shallow) above the benthic surface downstream of InnovaSea VR2W stationary receivers at distances of 100, 200, or 300 m. We used two receiver mount designs that included a fixed position within a PVC pipe on the downstream side of a bridge piling or a metal frame deployed in the middle of the river channel. Tags were deployed for 72 h at each location, and hourly detections were summarized. We evaluated downstream distance, receiver mount design, tag depth, and wind effects on tag detection using Bayesian logistic regression. Results Detection probability decreased as distance increased for all combinations of tag types and mount designs and varied from nearly 100% at 100 m to less than 10% at 300 m. The V16 transmitter had greater detection probability by the receiver mounted in the pipe than in the midriver frame. For both mounts, the deep V16 transmitter had greater detection probability than the V16 shallow transmitter. Detection probability of the V13 transmitter was similar between receiver mounts or transmitter depths. Wind speed had a negative impact on detection probabilities of both transmitter types and depths, except the deep V16 transmitter. Conclusions Deploying acoustic receivers in PVC pipes rather than midriver frames provided greater downstream detection probabilities for V16 transmitters under conditions evaluated in this study. In addition, V16 transmitters had greater detection probabilities when positioned deep within the water column rather than near the surface. We also demonstrated that wind speed can have a negative impact on detection probabilities.
Background: One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in environmental (i.e., wind and flow) and abiotic (i.e., bathymetry) conditions among aquatic systems can lead to differences in detection probability temporally or between systems. In this study we evaluate the effect of distance, receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed on detection probabilities of two models of acoustic transmitters in a mid-sized river. InnovaSea V16-6H (hereafter V16) and V13-1L (hereafter V13) tags were deployed in the James River, SD at 0.36 m (deep) and 2.29 m (V16 tag) or 1.98 m (V13 tag; shallow) above the benthic surface downstream of InnovaSea VR2W stationary receivers at distances of 100, 200, or 300 m. We used two receiver mount designs that included a fixed position within a PVC pipe on the downstream side of a bridge piling or a metal frame deployed in the middle of the river channel. Tags were deployed for 72 h at each location, and hourly detections were summarized. We evaluated downstream distance, receiver mount design, tag depth, and wind effects on tag detection using Bayesian logistic regression. Results: Detection probability decreased as distance increased for all combinations of tag types and mount designs and varied from nearly 100% at 100 m to less than 10% at 300 m. The V16 transmitter had greater detection probability by the receiver mounted in the pipe than in the midriver frame. For both mounts, the deep V16 transmitter had greater detection probability than the V16 shallow transmitter. Detection probability of the V13 transmitter was similar between receiver mounts or transmitter depths. Wind speed had a negative impact on detection probabilities of both transmitter types and depths, except the deep V16 transmitter. Conclusions: Deploying acoustic receivers in PVC pipes rather than midriver frames provided greater downstream detection probabilities for V16 transmitters under conditions evaluated in this study. In addition, V16 transmitters had greater detection probabilities when positioned deep within the water column rather than near the surface. We also demonstrated that wind speed can have a negative impact on detection probabilities.
BackgroundOne of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in environmental (i.e., wind and flow) and abiotic (i.e., bathymetry) conditions among aquatic systems can lead to differences in detection probability temporally or between systems. In this study we evaluate the effect of distance, receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed on detection probabilities of two models of acoustic transmitters in a mid-sized river. InnovaSea V16-6H (hereafter V16) and V13-1L (hereafter V13) tags were deployed in the James River, SD at 0.36 m (deep) and 2.29 m (V16 tag) or 1.98 m (V13 tag; shallow) above the benthic surface downstream of InnovaSea VR2W stationary receivers at distances of 100, 200, or 300 m. We used two receiver mount designs that included a fixed position within a PVC pipe on the downstream side of a bridge piling or a metal frame deployed in the middle of the river channel. Tags were deployed for 72 h at each location, and hourly detections were summarized. We evaluated downstream distance, receiver mount design, tag depth, and wind effects on tag detection using Bayesian logistic regression.ResultsDetection probability decreased as distance increased for all combinations of tag types and mount designs and varied from nearly 100% at 100 m to less than 10% at 300 m. The V16 transmitter had greater detection probability by the receiver mounted in the pipe than in the midriver frame. For both mounts, the deep V16 transmitter had greater detection probability than the V16 shallow transmitter. Detection probability of the V13 transmitter was similar between receiver mounts or transmitter depths. Wind speed had a negative impact on detection probabilities of both transmitter types and depths, except the deep V16 transmitter.ConclusionsDeploying acoustic receivers in PVC pipes rather than midriver frames provided greater downstream detection probabilities for V16 transmitters under conditions evaluated in this study. In addition, V16 transmitters had greater detection probabilities when positioned deep within the water column rather than near the surface. We also demonstrated that wind speed can have a negative impact on detection probabilities.
ArticleNumber 6
Audience Academic
Author Chipps, Steven R.
LaBrie, Lindsey A. P.
Schall, Benjamin J.
Carlson, Tanner L.
Wesner, Jeff S.
Coulter, Alison A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Tanner L.
  surname: Carlson
  fullname: Carlson, Tanner L.
  email: Tanner.L.Carlson@coyotes.usd.edu
  organization: Department of Biology, University of South Dakota
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lindsey A. P.
  surname: LaBrie
  fullname: LaBrie, Lindsey A. P.
  organization: Department of Biology, University of South Dakota
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jeff S.
  surname: Wesner
  fullname: Wesner, Jeff S.
  organization: Department of Biology, University of South Dakota
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Steven R.
  surname: Chipps
  fullname: Chipps, Steven R.
  organization: U.S. Geological Survey, South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, McFadden Biostress Laboratory, South Dakota State University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Alison A.
  surname: Coulter
  fullname: Coulter, Alison A.
  organization: Department of Natural Resource Management, McFadden Biostress Laboratory, South Dakota State University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Benjamin J.
  surname: Schall
  fullname: Schall, Benjamin J.
  organization: South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks
BookMark eNp9Ul1rFDEUHaSCtfYP-BTwxYdOzed8PJbiR6EiFH0OmeRmTZlJ1iRr2T_i7_XurtJapAlMQuacc3NPzsvmKKYITfOa0XPGhu5dkVSwvqWctxR3ot0-a445VbQVYlBHD_YvmtNSbimOkTExiuPm1w1YCD8hkyVtYiUOSljFM1KziWUJteIfB-v6_YyY6MhdwE9ZAzhivAe7I1RcQopkndNkpjCHuiXJE2PTptRgSYUZFqh5-1C0kBCJIZ9DKWmTA7nZ36HmMG2qydtXzXNv5gKnf9aT5tuH918vP7XXXz5eXV5ct1bxsbajGwdwAx38KLxyYzcpSQ0MvpNm6o2yrusZBRg76pyRVMGkDPWddQId45M4aa4Oui6ZW73OYcHiOpmg9wcpr7TJ2MQMWhkDdGKCC-alYnRysmcW63ROKsEUar09aKERPzZQql5CsTDPJgJaoXeYXnLeDwh98wh6iy5E7FTzHsegpOzvUSuD9UP0CQ20O1F90YuecckVRdT5f1A4HSzBYlJ8wPN_CMOBYHMqJYPXNlSze0Ikhlkzqnex0odYaYyV3sdKb5HKH1H_WvYkSRxIBcFxBfm-2SdYvwEyk-NR
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_najfmt_vqaf013
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40317_025_00411_7
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40317_023_00350_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_nafm_11052
Cites_doi 10.1186/s40317-022-00275-1
10.3354/meps08864
10.1577/M08-189.1
10.1016/j.fishres.2018.09.015
10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787
10.1002/ece3.2228
10.4319/lom.2008.6.327
10.1002/eco.2362
10.2989/AJMS.2009.31.3.8.996
10.18637/jss.v080.i01
10.1002/fsh.10215
10.1111/eff.12256
10.1139/cjfas-2017-0422
10.1071/MF08169
10.1186/s40317-019-0179-1
10.1007/s001800000038
10.1007/s10530-015-1020-2
10.1016/S0165-7836(98)00067-8
10.1007/978-3-030-80678-1_10
10.1126/science.1255642
10.1002/mcf2.10095
10.1007/s11160-013-9328-4
10.1577/M09-143.1
10.1111/2041-210X.12520
10.1111/jfb.14374
10.1111/fme.12089
10.1577/M03-224.1
10.1186/s40317-022-00291-1
10.1656/045.027.0417
10.1186/s40317-016-0112-9
10.1111/2041-210X.12057
10.1007/s10530-018-1772-6
10.1007/s10750-021-04556-3
10.1002/rra.3180
10.1577/T08-160.1
10.1071/MF05091
10.1080/00028487.2014.965344
10.1016/j.fishres.2012.02.008
10.1139/cjfas-2017-0406
10.3390/fishes4040060
10.1016/j.fishres.2016.05.009
10.1016/j.jglr.2021.08.007
10.1007/s10641-012-9990-8
10.1007/s10750-017-3296-y
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023
COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
8FE
8FH
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
LK8
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7S9
L.6
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s40317-022-00313-y
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList



AGRICOLA
Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: PIMPY
  name: Publicly Available Content Database
  url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Zoology
EISSN 2050-3385
EndPage 6
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_5aae0b13231f4510bd471c4ab6d45315
A737124250
10_1186_s40317_022_00313_y
GeographicLocations South Dakota
United States--US
Missouri River
North Dakota
James River
GeographicLocations_xml – name: South Dakota
– name: James River
– name: North Dakota
– name: Missouri River
– name: United States--US
GroupedDBID 0R~
4.4
5VS
8FE
8FH
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AAJSJ
AASML
ABDBF
ACGFS
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
ASPBG
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
C6C
CCPQU
EBLON
EBS
ESX
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCIFZ
IAO
IHR
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M7P
M~E
OK1
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQGLB
PROAC
PUEGO
RBZ
ROL
RSV
SOJ
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
ABUWG
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9d98ed808f93f5d96b540ae8f64ab7a5cd6710ee960dda405eb5a0f6cd33172b3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 4
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000931936100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2050-3385
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:53:36 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 16:10:00 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 30 12:41:28 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 11 10:09:36 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 17:44:27 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:57:47 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:29:23 EST 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:26:22 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Stationary receiver
Wind
V13
V16
Acoustic telemetry
Depth
Distance
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c529t-9d98ed808f93f5d96b540ae8f64ab7a5cd6710ee960dda405eb5a0f6cd33172b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/5aae0b13231f4510bd471c4ab6d45315
PQID 2777785447
PQPubID 2040173
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5aae0b13231f4510bd471c4ab6d45315
proquest_miscellaneous_3153742278
proquest_journals_2777785447
gale_infotracmisc_A737124250
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A737124250
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s40317_022_00313_y
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40317_022_00313_y
springer_journals_10_1186_s40317_022_00313_y
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-02-13
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-02-13
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-02-13
  day: 13
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle Animal biotelemetry
PublicationTitleAbbrev Anim Biotelemetry
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: BMC
References NV Klinard (313_CR11) 2019; 7
R Core Team (313_CR38) 2022
PC Bürkner (313_CR39) 2017; 80
A Babin (313_CR50) 2019
ER Winter (313_CR29) 2021; 848
ML Edwards (313_CR31) 2020; 27
MR Heupel (313_CR4) 2006; 57
MV Lubejko (313_CR41) 2017; 33
A Shultz (313_CR51) 2021
GL Rutz (313_CR45) 2014; 1112
313_CR20
MA Dance (313_CR35) 2016; 183
SJ Tripp (313_CR16) 2019; 44
M Fincel (313_CR21) 2022; 10
JJ Dyer (313_CR23) 2020; 97
T Starrs (313_CR43) 2017; 26
K Theimer (313_CR44) 2022
D James (313_CR19) 2014; 21
TH Selby (313_CR15) 2016; 6
MR Heupel (313_CR47) 2008; 6
Stan Development Team (313_CR37) 2022; 2
JM Whitty (313_CR42) 2009; 60
A Aunins (313_CR6) 2009; 138
SM Shroyer (313_CR28) 2009; 29
NE Hussey (313_CR2) 2015
AR Prechtel (313_CR5) 2018; 805
PS Titzler (313_CR46) 2010; 30
MV Treverrow (313_CR48) 1998; 35
CJ Michel (313_CR32) 2013; 96
KØ Gjelland (313_CR49) 2013; 4
JA Smith (313_CR7) 2015; 144
CC Krueger (313_CR12) 2018; 75
JL Abeln (313_CR25) 2018
AA Coulter (313_CR22) 2016; 18
SP Brooks (313_CR36) 1998; 7
ST Kessel (313_CR10) 2014; 24
J Bergé (313_CR26) 2012; 125
N Payne (313_CR1) 2010; 419
L Singh (313_CR13) 2009; 31
SF Colborune (313_CR8) 2021; 47
AA Coulter (313_CR9) 2018; 20
313_CR17
MC Melnychuk (313_CR27) 2012
RD Ellis (313_CR33) 2019; 209
J Berkhof (313_CR40) 2000; 15
DM Frechette (313_CR24) 2018; 75
S Clements (313_CR3) 2005; 25
JR Krause (313_CR34) 2020; 12
H Medwin (313_CR14) 1997
MJ Moore (313_CR18) 2022
C Huveneers (313_CR30) 2016; 7
References_xml – year: 2022
  ident: 313_CR44
  publication-title: Anim Biotelem
  doi: 10.1186/s40317-022-00275-1
– volume: 419
  start-page: 295
  year: 2010
  ident: 313_CR1
  publication-title: Mar Ecol Prog Ser
  doi: 10.3354/meps08864
– volume: 29
  start-page: 876
  year: 2009
  ident: 313_CR28
  publication-title: N Am J Fish Manag
  doi: 10.1577/M08-189.1
– volume: 209
  start-page: 186
  year: 2019
  ident: 313_CR33
  publication-title: Fish Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.09.015
– volume-title: Environmental drivers of habitat use by bigheaded carps to inform harvest in the Starved Rock Pool of the Illinois River Master’s thesis
  year: 2018
  ident: 313_CR25
– volume: 7
  start-page: 434
  year: 1998
  ident: 313_CR36
  publication-title: J Comput Graph Stat
  doi: 10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787
– volume: 6
  start-page: 4823
  year: 2016
  ident: 313_CR15
  publication-title: Ecol Evol
  doi: 10.1002/ece3.2228
– volume: 6
  start-page: 327
  year: 2008
  ident: 313_CR47
  publication-title: Limnol Oceanogr-Meth
  doi: 10.4319/lom.2008.6.327
– year: 2022
  ident: 313_CR18
  publication-title: Ecohydrology
  doi: 10.1002/eco.2362
– volume: 31
  start-page: 355
  year: 2009
  ident: 313_CR13
  publication-title: Afr J Mar Sci
  doi: 10.2989/AJMS.2009.31.3.8.996
– volume: 80
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 313_CR39
  publication-title: J Stat Softw
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
– volume: 44
  start-page: 183
  year: 2019
  ident: 313_CR16
  publication-title: Fisheries
  doi: 10.1002/fsh.10215
– volume: 26
  start-page: 75
  year: 2017
  ident: 313_CR43
  publication-title: Ecol Freshw Fish
  doi: 10.1111/eff.12256
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1999
  year: 2018
  ident: 313_CR24
  publication-title: Can J Fish Aquat Sci
  doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0422
– volume: 60
  start-page: 306
  year: 2009
  ident: 313_CR42
  publication-title: Mar Freshw Res
  doi: 10.1071/MF08169
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 313_CR11
  publication-title: Anim Biotelem
  doi: 10.1186/s40317-019-0179-1
– volume: 15
  start-page: 337
  year: 2000
  ident: 313_CR40
  publication-title: Comput Stat
  doi: 10.1007/s001800000038
– ident: 313_CR17
– volume: 18
  start-page: 471
  year: 2016
  ident: 313_CR22
  publication-title: Biol Invasions
  doi: 10.1007/s10530-015-1020-2
– volume: 1112
  start-page: 2014
  year: 2014
  ident: 313_CR45
  publication-title: US Geol Survey Rep
– volume: 35
  start-page: 127
  year: 1998
  ident: 313_CR48
  publication-title: Fish Res
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(98)00067-8
– start-page: 271
  volume-title: Yellow Perch, Walleye, and Sauger: aspects of ecology, management, and culture
  year: 2021
  ident: 313_CR51
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80678-1_10
– start-page: 339
  volume-title: Telemetry techniques: a user guide for fisheries research
  year: 2012
  ident: 313_CR27
– year: 2015
  ident: 313_CR2
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1255642
– volume: 12
  start-page: 241
  year: 2020
  ident: 313_CR34
  publication-title: Mar Coast Fish
  doi: 10.1002/mcf2.10095
– volume-title: Fundamentals of Oceanic Acoustics
  year: 1997
  ident: 313_CR14
– volume: 24
  start-page: 199
  year: 2014
  ident: 313_CR10
  publication-title: Rev Fish Biol Fish
  doi: 10.1007/s11160-013-9328-4
– volume: 2
  start-page: 5
  issue: 21
  year: 2022
  ident: 313_CR37
  publication-title: R package version
– volume: 30
  start-page: 853
  year: 2010
  ident: 313_CR46
  publication-title: N Am J Fish Manag
  doi: 10.1577/M09-143.1
– volume: 7
  start-page: 825
  year: 2016
  ident: 313_CR30
  publication-title: Meth Ecol Evol
  doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12520
– volume: 97
  start-page: 279
  year: 2020
  ident: 313_CR23
  publication-title: J Fish Biol
  doi: 10.1111/jfb.14374
– volume: 21
  start-page: 421
  year: 2014
  ident: 313_CR19
  publication-title: Fish Manag Ecol
  doi: 10.1111/fme.12089
– volume: 25
  start-page: 429
  year: 2005
  ident: 313_CR3
  publication-title: N Am J Fish Manag
  doi: 10.1577/M03-224.1
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 313_CR21
  publication-title: Anim Biotelem
  doi: 10.1186/s40317-022-00291-1
– volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  year: 2022
  ident: 313_CR38
– volume: 27
  start-page: 792
  year: 2020
  ident: 313_CR31
  publication-title: Northeast Nat
  doi: 10.1656/045.027.0417
– ident: 313_CR20
  doi: 10.1186/s40317-016-0112-9
– volume: 4
  start-page: 665
  year: 2013
  ident: 313_CR49
  publication-title: Methods Ecol Evol
  doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12057
– volume: 20
  start-page: 3255
  year: 2018
  ident: 313_CR9
  publication-title: Biol Invasions
  doi: 10.1007/s10530-018-1772-6
– volume: 848
  start-page: 1825
  year: 2021
  ident: 313_CR29
  publication-title: Hydrobiologia
  doi: 10.1007/s10750-021-04556-3
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1268
  year: 2017
  ident: 313_CR41
  publication-title: River Res Appl
  doi: 10.1002/rra.3180
– volume: 138
  start-page: 1392
  year: 2009
  ident: 313_CR6
  publication-title: Virginia Trans Am Fish Soc
  doi: 10.1577/T08-160.1
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: 313_CR4
  publication-title: Mar Freshw Res
  doi: 10.1071/MF05091
– volume: 144
  start-page: 48
  year: 2015
  ident: 313_CR7
  publication-title: Trans Am Fish Soc
  doi: 10.1080/00028487.2014.965344
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 313_CR26
  publication-title: Fish Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.02.008
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1755
  year: 2018
  ident: 313_CR12
  publication-title: Can J Fish Aquat Sci
  doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0406
– year: 2019
  ident: 313_CR50
  publication-title: Fishes
  doi: 10.3390/fishes4040060
– volume: 183
  start-page: 80
  year: 2016
  ident: 313_CR35
  publication-title: Fish Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.05.009
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1814
  year: 2021
  ident: 313_CR8
  publication-title: J Gt Lakes Res.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2021.08.007
– volume: 96
  start-page: 257
  year: 2013
  ident: 313_CR32
  publication-title: Environ Biol Fishes
  doi: 10.1007/s10641-012-9990-8
– volume: 805
  start-page: 203
  year: 2018
  ident: 313_CR5
  publication-title: Hydrobiologia
  doi: 10.1007/s10750-017-3296-y
SSID ssj0000911393
Score 2.2386234
Snippet Background One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver....
Background One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver....
One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver. Variation in...
BackgroundOne of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver....
Background: One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the receiver....
Abstract Background One of the most important considerations for acoustic telemetry study designs is detection probability between the transmitter and the...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Acoustic telemetry
Acoustics
Analysis
Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
animals
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian theory
Bioinformatics
Biomedical and Life Sciences
biotelemetry
Communications equipment
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Depth
Distance
Fish
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Galvanized steel
Life Sciences
Mathematical models
Missouri River
Polyvinyl chloride
Probability
regression analysis
Rivers
Stationary receiver
Telemetry
Terrestial Ecology
Transmitters
V16
Water column
Wind
wind speed
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Biological Science Database
  dbid: M7P
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaggMSFNyJQkJGQOLBRs7EdOydUEBUHqCoEqOJiOX6UlWiyJAGUP8LvZcZJtqwqeiHH2E5szXhmbH_-hpBnYlllMnCbukralEvHUxNsSJmRAtylzaqYY-nzO3l4qI6Py6Npw62bYJWzTYyG2jUW98j3cgmPEpzLl-vvKWaNwtPVKYXGZXIFWRJYhO4dbfZYwBdCgMPmuzKq2Os4KLFMEcIeWQvTYcsfRdr-88b53ClpdD4HN_-327fIjSnspPujntwml3x9h1z70sRN9bvkN0SPHhEa9BRzR1AXcR0L2qMnO13hjR94t-6_LqipHf0FC3narcHxURPxIFDYR0xXTTFDzcj9PdAmUDC4MV8Y7T0C1ft2-PujHV3V1ND3IH08DKAfYh_GJFymHe6RTwdvPr5-m04ZG1Ir8rJPS1cq71SmQsmCcGVRQUBovAoFN5U0wroCIhrvYdnknIFY0VfCZKGwjoFY8ordJzt1U_sHhLLc5D63ogySIYu-shDMcCO9dE7JKk_IcpabthOdOWbV-KbjskYVepS1BllHAlSmh4S82LRZj2QeF9Z-heqwqYlE3PFF057oaV5rYYwHfWYQJgcO9q1y4O0tjLZwHMybSMhzVCaN5gK6Z8106wEGicRbel8yucRlX5aQ3a2aMM3tdvGsYHoyM50-066EPN0UY0uEztUeJKyhE0xyvPGckMWsxmef-Pf4H178x0fkeg4BHyLYl2yX7PTtD_-YXLU_-1XXPokT8Q-MgDw2
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: SpringerLink Contemporary (1997 - Present)
  dbid: RSV
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaggMSFd0WgICMhcWAjsrEdO8dSteIAFSpQVVwsxw9Yqc2ukrQof4Tfy4yTLKwKSJCjH5Ef87L9zQwhz8W8ymTgNnWVtCmXjqcm2JAyIwWoS5tVMcfS8Vt5eKhOTsr3o1NYO6HdpyfJKKkjW6viVcuB_mSK6PMYcDDtr5JroO4UsuPRh-P1zQpoQDBr2OQh89uuG1ooBuu_LJIvvY1GlXNw-_8Ge4fcGk1MujvQxF1yxdf3yI3Py3iBfp98B0vRIxqDnmGeCOoihmNGO9RaZwv07oGyVfd1Rk3t6Dc4tNN2BUqOmoj9gMou4rdqitlohjjfPV0GCsI15gajnUdQetf0v_60pYuaGvoOdhov_ulRHMOQcMs0_QPy6WD_496bdMzOkFqRl11aulJ5pzIVShaEK4sKjD_jVSi4qaQR1hVgvXgPRyTnDNiFvhImC4V1DJYmr9g22aqXtX9IKMtN7nMryiAZRsxXFgwXbqSXzilZ5QmZT7ul7Ri6HDNonOp4hFGFHtZbw3rHYKdM9wl5ue6zGgJ3_LX1aySCdUsMuh0Lls0XPfKwFsZ4oF0GJnHgIMsqB5rdwmwLx0GUiYS8QBLSKBpgeNaMHg4wSQyypXclk3M84mUJ2dloCSxtN6snItSjSGl1LuFTgnOZkGfrauyJMLnaww5rGASTHL2bEzKbCPPnL_48_0f_1vwxuZmDsYfo9TnbIVtdc-6fkOv2olu0zdPIjj8A7sQyvg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Receiver mount design, transmitter depth, and wind speed affect detection probability of acoustic telemetry transmitters in a Missouri River tributary
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40317-022-00313-y
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2777785447
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153742278
https://doaj.org/article/5aae0b13231f4510bd471c4ab6d45315
Volume 11
WOSCitedRecordID wos000931936100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMed Central Open Access Free
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-3385
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000911393
  issn: 2050-3385
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20130101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-3385
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000911393
  issn: 2050-3385
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20130101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-3385
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000911393
  issn: 2050-3385
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20120101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Biological Science Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-3385
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000911393
  issn: 2050-3385
  databaseCode: M7P
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-3385
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000911393
  issn: 2050-3385
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-3385
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000911393
  issn: 2050-3385
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-3385
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000911393
  issn: 2050-3385
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20131201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELfQAIkXxKcIjMpISDzQaGnsxM7jhjaBxKqowDR4sRx_aJVYWjXZUP4R_l7unLS0moAX-lZ_RLbvfL5Lfv4dIa-zSZUIz01sK2FiLiyPtTc-ZlpkcFyapAo5ls4-iulUnp8X5VaqL8SE9fTA_cIdZFo76MDAD_EcFKiyYE4N11VuOehPYC8Fr2crmAo2GPYwK9j6lozMDxoO6itiBK8HvsK42zmJAmH_TbN84_toOHZOHpD7g79ID_txPiS3XP2I3P22CG_DH5Of4PY5hFbQS0z6QG0AZIxpi0fQ5Ryv6kDZsr0YU11b-gMicNos4cSiOgA5oLINYKyaYmqZnrS7owtPwVKGRF-0dYgwb1fd9kMbOq-ppqcgNnyLT2dhDH32LL3qnpAvJ8ef372Ph1QLscnSoo0LW0hnZSJ9wXxmi7wCT0476XNYaaEzY3NwRZyDeMdaDU6eqzKd-NxYBquaVuwp2asXtXtGKEt16lKTFV4wpL-XBrwQroUT1kpRpRGZrJddmYGHHNNhfFchHpG56kWlQFSBuZSpLiJvN32WPQvHX1sfoTQ3LZFBOxSAXqlBr9S_9Coib1AXFO5zGJ7Rw3UFmCQyZqlDwcQE47UkIvs7LWF_mt3qtTapwT40KhXwkxnnIiKvNtXYEzFvtQMJKxgEExyvKkdkvNbC34_48_yf_4_5vyD3UvDnEKA-Yftkr11duZfkjrlu581qRG4fHU_L2SjsuhECZksoKz-cll_h3-zT2S_JSTK-
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1bb9MwFLZGB4IX7ojAACOBeKDR0tiJkweExmVatbaq0ECDF-PYDlRiaWkCU_4IP4PfyDlO0lFN7G0P5CEPsePYyXcujo_PR8iTaJAFIufaN5nQPheG-yrXuc-UiMBc6iBzHEsfRmIySQ4P0-kG-d3thcGwyk4nOkVt5hr_kW-HAo4k4ly8XHz3kTUKV1c7Co0GFvu2PoYpW_li-Aa-79Mw3H178HrPb1kFfB2FaeWnJk2sSYIkT1kemTTOwGlRNsljrjKhIm1isLrWgmtvjAJ_xmaRCvJYGwa2NswYtHuBbHIAe9Ijm9PhePpx9VcHrC-4VKzbnZPE2yUHsRE-Bs27PIl-vWYBHVHAaXNwal3Wmbvda__bi7pOrraONd1pJOEG2bDFTXLp09wtG9wiv8A_thiDQo-QHYMaF7nSpxXa6qMZ7mmCa4vqa5-qwtDjGZzKBZh2qlzECxRWLmqtoMjB02Q3r-k8p2BSHCMarSyG4lfL-u9GSzorqKJjwDcud9B3rg8NzZha1rfJ-3N5KXdIr5gX9i6hLFShDXWU5oIhT0CiwV3jSlhhTCKy0CODDidStwnbkTfkm3QTtySWDbYkYMuleGWy9sjz1T2LJl3JmbVfIfxWNTHVuLswX36RreaSkVIWJJbBRCDnoMEzA_6MhtHGhoMCjzzyDMErUSFC97Rq93XAIDG1mNwRTAxwYht4ZGutJigyvV7cAVq2irSUJ2j2yONVMd6JwYGFhS8soRNMcNzT7ZF-JzYnTfx7_PfOfuIjcnnvYDySo-Fk_z65EoJ7i_H6A7ZFetXyh31ALuqf1axcPmzVACWfz1ug_gDJMJw3
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwELagHOKFGxEoYCQkHtio2diJncdyrECUVcVRVbxYjg-6UptdJQGUP8LvZcZJlq4KSIg8-oh8jOewZ74h5Ek2LRPhuYltKUzMheWx9sbHTIsMxKVJypBj6WBPzOfy8LDYPxXFH7zdxyfJPqYBUZqqdmdlfX_EZb7TcKBFEaMnegAfjLvz5ALHpEFor384WN-ygDQEFYeN0TK_7bohkQJw_1n2fOadNIif2bX_H_h1cnVQPeluTys3yDlX3SSXPi_Dxfot8gM0SIdeGvQE80dQG3w7JrRFaXaywKgfKFu1RxOqK0u_gzFPmxUIP6qDTwhUtsGvq6KYpabH_-7o0lNguiFnGG0dOqu3dXf6pw1dVFTTd0AB-CBA34cx9Im4dN3dJp9mrz6-eB0PWRtik6VFGxe2kM7KRPqC-cwWeQlKoXbS51yXQmfG5qDVOAemk7Ua9EVXZjrxubEMliYt2R2yVS0rd5dQlurUpSYrvGCIpC8NKDRcCyeslaJMIzIdd06ZAdIcM2scq2DayFz1661gvQMIKlNdRJ6t-6x6QI-_tn6OBLFuiWDcoWBZf1HD2VaZ1g5omoGq7DnwuNKCxDcw29xyYHFZRJ4iOSlkGTA8o4fIB5gkgm-pXcHEFE2_JCLbGy3hqJvN6pEg1cBqGpUK-GTGuYjI43U19kT3ucrBDisYBBMco54jMhmJ9Ncv_jz_e__W_BG5vP9ypvbezN_eJ1dS0AfRwX3KtslWW391D8hF861dNPXDcEp_AkjtPoY
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Receiver+mount+design%2C+transmitter+depth%2C+and+wind+speed+affect+detection+probability+of+acoustic+telemetry+transmitters+in+a+Missouri+River+tributary&rft.jtitle=Animal+biotelemetry&rft.au=Tanner+L.+Carlson&rft.au=Lindsey+A.+P.+LaBrie&rft.au=Jeff+S.+Wesner&rft.au=Steven+R.+Chipps&rft.date=2023-02-13&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=2050-3385&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40317-022-00313-y&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_5aae0b13231f4510bd471c4ab6d45315
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2050-3385&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2050-3385&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2050-3385&client=summon