Medios– An offline, smartphone-based artificial intelligence algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy
An observational study to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the Medios smartphone-based offline deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) software to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared with the image diagnosis of ophthalmologists. Patients attending the outpatient services of a terti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of ophthalmology Jg. 68; H. 2; S. 391 - 395 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
India
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
01.02.2020
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0301-4738, 1998-3689, 1998-3689 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | An observational study to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the Medios smartphone-based offline deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) software to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared with the image diagnosis of ophthalmologists.
Patients attending the outpatient services of a tertiary center for diabetes care underwent 3-field dilated retinal imaging using the Remidio NM FOP 10. Two fellowship-trained vitreoretinal specialists separately graded anonymized images and a patient-level diagnosis was reached based on grading of the worse eye. The images were subjected to offline grading using the Medios integrated AI-based software on the same smartphone used to acquire images. The sensitivity and specificity of the AI in detecting referable DR (moderate non-proliferative DR (NPDR) or worse disease) was compared to the gold standard diagnosis of the retina specialists.
Results include analysis of images from 297 patients of which 176 (59.2%) had no DR, 35 (11.7%) had mild NPDR, 41 (13.8%) had moderate NPDR, and 33 (11.1%) had severe NPDR. In addition, 12 (4%) patients had PDR and 36 (20.4%) had macular edema. Sensitivity and specificity of the AI in detecting referable DR was 98.84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.62-100%) and 86.73% (95% CI, 82.87-90.59%), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.92. The sensitivity for vision-threatening DR (VTDR) was 100%.
The AI-based software had high sensitivity and specificity in detecting referable DR. Integration with the smartphone-based fundus camera with offline image grading has the potential for widespread applications in resource-poor settings. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ISSN: | 0301-4738 1998-3689 1998-3689 |
| DOI: | 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1203_19 |