Understanding building sustainability - the case of Sweden

Sustainability reports constitute a good source to check how companies have understood sustainability. The purpose of this paper is to interpret how building sustainability has been understood, defined and measured, using sustainability reports from the building value chain in Sweden. Sweden has bee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Total quality management & business excellence Jg. 36; H. 3-4; S. 222 - 236
Hauptverfasser: Isaksson, Raine, Rosvall, Max
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Abingdon Routledge 17.02.2025
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Schlagworte:
building sustainability
Business metrics
Carbon footprint
definition
Engineering Science with specialization in Civil Engineering and Built Environment
maturity grid
performance indicators
Residential buildings
Sustainability reporting
Sustainable development
Teknisk fysik med inriktning mot byggteknik och byggd miljö
Value chain
Sweden
ISSN:1478-3363, 1478-3371, 1478-3371
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sustainability reports constitute a good source to check how companies have understood sustainability. The purpose of this paper is to interpret how building sustainability has been understood, defined and measured, using sustainability reports from the building value chain in Sweden. Sweden has been chosen since it is rated as a sustainability leader and could therefore be expected to be a benchmark. The analyses are based on how sustainability has been defined and what the level of reporting maturity has been. A maturity grid that assesses if the most important impacts have been considered in the entire value chain has been used. Also, it has been checked if there are indicators measuring sustainability with externally set goals. Results indicate that there seems to be no common agreement on what building sustainability is. Most studied companies have not presented a clear definition of how they have interpreted sustainable development and there is no clear focus on key issues such as climate and affordability. Sustainable building could, based on the deduced main sustainability impacts, be seen as affordable with zero carbon footprint. Fundamental Key Performance Indicators for residential building sustainability could be such as m 2 living per carbon footprint and per price.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1478-3363
1478-3371
1478-3371
DOI:10.1080/14783363.2020.1853520