A computational scheme for the optimal strategy in an incomplete market

We examine the optimal portfolio selection problem of a single agent who receives an unhedgeable endowment. The agent wishes to optimize his/her log-utility derived from his/her terminal wealth. We do not solve this problem analytically but construct a recursive computational algorithm which approxi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic dynamics & control Jg. 31; H. 11; S. 3591 - 3613
Hauptverfasser: Keppo, Jussi, Meng, Xu, Sullivan, Michael G.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.11.2007
North-Holland Publ. Co
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Schriftenreihe:Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Schlagworte:
Algorithms
Computational methods
Endowment
Endowment uncertainty
Hedging
Incomplete markets
Intelligence
Investment decision
Market analysis
Numerical methods
Optimization algorithms
Portfolio management
Portfolio selection
Portfolios
Recursion
Studies
Utility maximization
Utility measurement
Wealth
D52
Utility maximization
G11
Incomplete markets
Endowment uncertainty
Numerical methods
ISSN:0165-1889, 1879-1743
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We examine the optimal portfolio selection problem of a single agent who receives an unhedgeable endowment. The agent wishes to optimize his/her log-utility derived from his/her terminal wealth. We do not solve this problem analytically but construct a recursive computational algorithm which approximates the optimal one. We present an ‘intelligent’ initial portfolio which requires, numerically, about 25 % fewer corrective steps in the algorithm than a random initial portfolio, and outperforms the portfolio which ignores the unhedgeable risk of the endowment.
Bibliographie:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-1889
1879-1743
DOI:10.1016/j.jedc.2006.12.006