Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex

While numerous studies have explored the mechanisms of reward-based decisions (the choice of action based on expected gain), few have asked how reward influences attention (the selection of information relevant for a decision). Here we show that a powerful determinant of attentional priority is the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of neuroscience Vol. 29; no. 36; p. 11182
Main Authors: Peck, Christopher J, Jangraw, David C, Suzuki, Mototaka, Efem, Richard, Gottlieb, Jacqueline
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 09.09.2009
Subjects:
Action Potentials - physiology
Animals
Attention - physiology
Macaca mulatta
Male
Parietal Lobe - physiology
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Reward
Time Factors
ISSN:1529-2401, 1529-2401
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While numerous studies have explored the mechanisms of reward-based decisions (the choice of action based on expected gain), few have asked how reward influences attention (the selection of information relevant for a decision). Here we show that a powerful determinant of attentional priority is the association between a stimulus and an appetitive reward. A peripheral cue heralded the delivery of reward or no reward (these cues are termed herein RC+ and RC-, respectively); to experience the predicted outcome, monkeys made a saccade to a target that appeared unpredictably at the same or opposite location relative to the cue. Although the RC had no operant associations (did not specify the required saccade), they automatically biased attention, such that an RC+ attracted attention and an RC- repelled attention from its location. Neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) encoded these attentional biases, maintaining sustained excitation at the location of an RC+ and inhibition at the location of an RC-. Contrary to the hypothesis that LIP encodes action value, neurons did not encode the expected reward of the saccade. Moreover, at odds with an adaptive decision process, the cue-evoked biases interfered with the required saccade, and these biases increased rather than abating with training. After prolonged training, valence selectivity appeared at shorter latencies and automatically transferred to a novel task context, suggesting that training produced visual plasticity. The results suggest that reward predictors gain automatic attentional priority regardless of their operant associations, and this valence-specific priority is encoded in LIP independently of the expected reward of an action.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-09.2009