Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile)

More than thirteen decades after Chile annexed Bolivia's coastal regions, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) denied Bolivia's longstanding claim that Chile had undertaken a legal obligation to negotiate granting it sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	The American journal of international law Vol. 113; no. 2; pp. 347 - 353
Main Author:	Dunkelberg, Alonso Gurmendi
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.04.2019
Subjects:	Access Agreements Boundaries Coastal areas Coasts Colonies & territories COMMERCE Diplomatic & consular services International Court of Justice International courts INTERNATIONAL DECISIONS International Decisions: Edited by Harlan Grant Cohen Law and legislation Law of the sea Marine NEGOTIATION Negotiations Obligations Oceans Pacific Ocean Peace Peace treaties PEACEKEEPING SOVEREIGNTY TREATIES CHILE BOLIVIA Pacific Ocean Chile Paraguay Bolivia Peru intention to be legally bound International Court of Justice obligation to negotiate 1904 Treaty of Peace and Friendship (Bolivia-Chile)
ISSN:	0002-9300, 2161-7953
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	More than thirteen decades after Chile annexed Bolivia's coastal regions, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) denied Bolivia's longstanding claim that Chile had undertaken a legal obligation to negotiate granting it sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean.
Bibliography:	AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, Vol. 113, No. 2, Apr 2019: 347-353 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, Vol. 113, No. 2, Apr 2019, 347-353 AGIS_c.jpg 2019-04-11T16:56:13+10:00 Informit, Melbourne (Vic) ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14
ISSN:	0002-9300 2161-7953
DOI:	10.1017/ajil.2019.9