Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use

To conduct a scoping review of knowledge translation (KT) theories, models, and frameworks that have been used to guide dissemination or implementation of evidence-based interventions targeted to prevention and/or management of cancer or other chronic diseases. We used a comprehensive multistage sea...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of clinical epidemiology Ročník 100; s. 92 - 102
Hlavní autoři: Strifler, Lisa, Cardoso, Roberta, McGowan, Jessie, Cogo, Elise, Nincic, Vera, Khan, Paul A., Scott, Alistair, Ghassemi, Marco, MacDonald, Heather, Lai, Yonda, Treister, Victoria, Tricco, Andrea C., Straus, Sharon E.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2018
Elsevier Limited
Témata:
Cancer
Chronic illnesses
Database searching
Databases, Bibliographic
Design
Disease
Disease prevention
Epidemiology
Evidence-Based Medicine - methods
Female
Framework
Health promotion
Humans
Implementation
Intervention
Knowledge
Knowledge synthesis
Knowledge translation
Male
Models, Theoretical
Organizational change
Search process
Studies
Sustainability
Taxonomy
Theory
Translation
Translational Research, Biomedical - methods
Model
Knowledge synthesis
Theory
Knowledge translation
Implementation
Framework
ISSN:0895-4356, 1878-5921, 1878-5921
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:To conduct a scoping review of knowledge translation (KT) theories, models, and frameworks that have been used to guide dissemination or implementation of evidence-based interventions targeted to prevention and/or management of cancer or other chronic diseases. We used a comprehensive multistage search process from 2000 to 2016, which included traditional bibliographic database searching, searching using names of theories, models and frameworks, and cited reference searching. Two reviewers independently screened the literature and abstracted the data. We found 596 studies reporting on the use of 159 KT theories, models, or frameworks. A majority (87%) of the identified theories, models, or frameworks were used in five or fewer studies, with 60% used once. The theories, models, and frameworks were most commonly used to inform planning/design, implementation and evaluation activities, and least commonly used to inform dissemination and sustainability/scalability activities. Twenty-six were used across the full implementation spectrum (from planning/design to sustainability/scalability) either within or across studies. All were used for at least individual-level behavior change, whereas 48% were used for organization-level, 33% for community-level, and 17% for system-level change. We found a significant number of KT theories, models, and frameworks with a limited evidence base describing their use.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Literature Review-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.008