Constructing interorganizational collaboration The action researcher as boundary subject

This article aims to explore critically the role of an action research team in the social construction of interorganizational collaboration aimed at transgressing organizational and professional boundaries. We argue that the new relationships, actor conceptions and in some cases forms of work organi...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Action research (London, England) Ročník 8; číslo 3; s. 293 - 314
Hlavní autoři: Huzzard, Tony, Ahlberg, Beth Maina, Ekman, Marianne
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London, England SAGE Publications 01.09.2010
Sage Publications
Sage Publications Ltd
Témata:
ISSN:1476-7503, 1741-2617, 1741-2617
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:This article aims to explore critically the role of an action research team in the social construction of interorganizational collaboration aimed at transgressing organizational and professional boundaries. We argue that the new relationships, actor conceptions and in some cases forms of work organization arising from the change process have been socially constructed through the discursive interventions of the researchers. This has largely occurred through informal interaction with and between the actors engaged in the development process. The action researcher, rather than being a neutral discursive gatekeeper in collaborative development projects, is an active constructor of the discourse shaping the collaboration. A case is presented showing how the researcher role is thus better seen as being an active boundary subject mediating across various professional and organizational perspectives rather than a passive boundary object. Accordingly, by focusing on the discursive role of active researchers as boundary subjects, we can reflect more critically on the roles we adopt in our intervention endeavours and their inevitably political nature.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1476-7503
1741-2617
1741-2617
DOI:10.1177/1476750309335206