Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1

Objectives To evaluate the agreement among readers with different expertise in detecting suspicious lesions at prostate multiparametric MRI using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1. Methods We evaluated 200 consecutive biopsy-naïve or previously negative biopsy men who...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:European radiology Ročník 30; číslo 6; s. 3383 - 3392
Hlavní autoři: Brembilla, Giorgio, Dell’Oglio, Paolo, Stabile, Armando, Damascelli, Anna, Brunetti, Lisa, Ravelli, Silvia, Cristel, Giulia, Schiani, Elena, Venturini, Elena, Grippaldi, Daniele, Mendola, Vincenzo, Rancoita, Paola Maria Vittoria, Esposito, Antonio, Briganti, Alberto, Montorsi, Francesco, Del Maschio, Alessandro, De Cobelli, Francesco
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.06.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Témata:
Aged
Agreements
Biopsy
Diagnostic Radiology
Evaluation
Humans
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Lesions
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Neuroradiology
Observer Variation
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Radiologists
Radiology
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Ultrasound
Urogenital
Magnetic resonance imaging
Prostate cancer
Inter-observer variability
ISSN:0938-7994, 1432-1084, 1432-1084
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Objectives To evaluate the agreement among readers with different expertise in detecting suspicious lesions at prostate multiparametric MRI using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1. Methods We evaluated 200 consecutive biopsy-naïve or previously negative biopsy men who underwent MRI for clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa) between May and September 2017. Of them, 132 patients underwent prostate biopsy. Seven radiologists (four dedicated uro-radiologists and three non-dedicated abdominal radiologists) reviewed and scored all MRI examinations according to PI-RADS v2.1. Agreement on index lesion detection was evaluated with Conger’s k coefficient, agreement coefficient 1 (AC1), percentage of agreement (PA), and indexes of specific positive and negative agreement. Clinical and radiological features that may influence variability were evaluated. Results Agreement in index lesion detection among all readers was substantial (AC1 0.738; 95% CI 0.695–0.782); dedicated radiologists showed higher agreement compared with non-dedicated readers. Clinical and radiological parameters that positively influenced agreement were PSA density ≥ 0.15 ng/mL/cc, pre-MRI high risk for PCa, positivity threshold of PI-RADS score 4 + 5, PZ lesions, homogeneous signal intensity of the PZ, and subjectively easy interpretation of MRI. Positive specific agreement was significantly higher among dedicated readers, up to 93.4% (95% CI 90.7–95.4) in patients harboring csPCa. Agreement on absence of lesions was excellent for both dedicated and non-dedicated readers (respectively 85.1% [95% CI 78.4–92.3] and 82.0% [95% CI 77.2–90.1]). Conclusions Agreement on index lesion detection among radiologists of various experiences is substantial to excellent using PI-RADS v2.1. Concordance on absence of lesions is excellent across readers’ experience. Key Points • Agreement on index lesion detection among radiologists of various experiences is substantial to excellent using PI-RADS v2.1. • Concordance between experienced readers is higher than between less-experienced readers. • Concordance on absence of lesions is excellent across readers’ experience.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-019-06654-2