On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs

Does one’s stance toward evidence evaluation and belief revision have relevance for actual beliefs? We investigate the role of endorsing an actively open-minded thinking style about evidence (AOT-E) on a wide range of beliefs, values, and opinions. Participants indicated the extent to which they thi...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Judgment and decision making Ročník 15; číslo 4; s. 476 - 498
Hlavní autoři: Pennycook, Gordon, Cheyne, James Allan, Koehler, Derek J., Fugelsang, Jonathan A.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Tallahassee Society for Judgment and Decision Making 01.07.2020
Cambridge University Press
Témata:
ISSN:1930-2975, 1930-2975
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Does one’s stance toward evidence evaluation and belief revision have relevance for actual beliefs? We investigate the role of endorsing an actively open-minded thinking style about evidence (AOT-E) on a wide range of beliefs, values, and opinions. Participants indicated the extent to which they think beliefs (Study 1) or opinions (Studies 2 and 3) ought to change according to evidence on an 8-item scale. Across three studies with 1,692 participants from two different sources (Mechanical Turk and Lucid for Academics), we find that our short AOT-E scale correlates negatively with beliefs about topics ranging from extrasensory perception, to respect for tradition, to abortion, to God; and positively with topics ranging from anthropogenic global warming to support for free speech on college campuses. More broadly, the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence was robustly associated with political liberalism, the rejection of traditional moral values, the acceptance of science, and skepticism about religious, paranormal, and conspiratorial claims. However, we also find that AOT-E is more strongly predictive for political liberals (Democrats) than conservatives (Republicans). We conclude that socio-cognitive theories of belief (both specific and general) should take into account people’s beliefs about when and how beliefs should change – that is, meta-beliefs – but that further work is required to understand how meta-beliefs about evidence interact with political ideology.
AbstractList Does one's stance toward evidence evaluation and belief revision have relevance for actual beliefs? We investigate the role of endorsing an actively open-minded thinking style about evidence (AOT-E) on a wide range of beliefs, values, and opinions. Participants indicated the extent to which they think beliefs (Study 1) or opinions (Studies 2 and 3) ought to change according to evidence on an 8-item scale. Across three studies with 1,692 participants from two different sources (Mechanical Turk and Lucid for Academics), we find that our short AOT-E scale correlates negatively with beliefs about topics ranging from extrasensory perception, to respect for tradition, to abortion, to God; and positively with topics ranging from anthropogenic global warming to support for free speech on college campuses. More broadly, the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence was robustly associated with political liberalism, the rejection of traditional moral values, the acceptance of science, and skepticism about religious, paranormal, and conspiratorial claims. However, we also find that AOT-E is more strongly predictive for political liberals (Democrats) than conservatives (Republicans). We conclude that socio-cognitive theories of belief (both specific and general) should take into account people's beliefs about when and how beliefs should change-- that is, meta-beliefs--but that further work is required to understand how meta-beliefs about evidence interact with political ideology. Keywords: actively open-minded thinking, belief revision, meta-beliefs
Does one's stance toward evidence evaluation and belief revision have relevance for actual beliefs? We investigate the role of endorsing an actively open-minded thinking style about evidence (AOT-E) on a wide range of beliefs, values, and opinions. Participants indicated the extent to which they think beliefs (Study 1) or opinions (Studies 2 and 3) ought to change according to evidence on an 8-item scale. Across three studies with 1,692 participants from two different sources (Mechanical Turk and Lucid for Academics), we find that our short AOT-E scale correlates negatively with beliefs about topics ranging from extrasensory perception, to respect for tradition, to abortion, to God; and positively with topics ranging from anthropogenic global warming to support for free speech on college campuses. More broadly, the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence was robustly associated with political liberalism, the rejection of traditional moral values, the acceptance of science, and skepticism about religious, paranormal, and conspiratorial claims. However, we also find that AOT-E is more strongly predictive for political liberals (Democrats) than conservatives (Republicans). We conclude that socio-cognitive theories of belief (both specific and general) should take into account people's beliefs about when and how beliefs should change-- that is, meta-beliefs--but that further work is required to understand how meta-beliefs about evidence interact with political ideology.
Does one’s stance toward evidence evaluation and belief revision have relevance for actual beliefs? We investigate the role of endorsing an actively open-minded thinking style about evidence (AOT-E) on a wide range of beliefs, values, and opinions. Participants indicated the extent to which they think beliefs (Study 1) or opinions (Studies 2 and 3) ought to change according to evidence on an 8-item scale. Across three studies with 1,692 participants from two different sources (Mechanical Turk and Lucid for Academics), we find that our short AOT-E scale correlates negatively with beliefs about topics ranging from extrasensory perception, to respect for tradition, to abortion, to God; and positively with topics ranging from anthropogenic global warming to support for free speech on college campuses. More broadly, the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence was robustly associated with political liberalism, the rejection of traditional moral values, the acceptance of science, and skepticism about religious, paranormal, and conspiratorial claims. However, we also find that AOT-E is more strongly predictive for political liberals (Democrats) than conservatives (Republicans). We conclude that socio-cognitive theories of belief (both specific and general) should take into account people’s beliefs about when and how beliefs should change – that is, meta-beliefs – but that further work is required to understand how meta-beliefs about evidence interact with political ideology.
Audience Academic
Author Cheyne, James Allan
Koehler, Derek J.
Pennycook, Gordon
Fugelsang, Jonathan A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Gordon
  surname: Pennycook
  fullname: Pennycook, Gordon
– sequence: 2
  givenname: James Allan
  surname: Cheyne
  fullname: Cheyne, James Allan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Derek J.
  surname: Koehler
  fullname: Koehler, Derek J.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jonathan A.
  surname: Fugelsang
  fullname: Fugelsang, Jonathan A.
BookMark eNp9Uttu1DAQjVCRaEs_gDdLvHaL7dhOzFtV0bJSpT5An61ZX7JeJXawvUh8DP-Ks1vuCF80R6M5Z8aeOWtOQgy2aV4RfEUw6d58ILLFVHYc19WxVj5rThfXavGd_IJfNGc57zDmVOLutPn6EFDZWrSxo7euQihPOKO8jfvRIL2FMFgEWsdkfBhQich-9sYGbd-i9TSPXkPxMWTkYkK6gtknKDF5GC_RFNNiZkgQYpoOOI6-VFKFqeYafNznSwTBoKz9Ivu9hJfNcwdjthdP9rx5vH338eb96v7hbn1zfb_SrKdlJWXHqMFtLywn9cjWEdEZoUG3PTE948JSZjrusN44Y7ilIKSQ0roNaNe15836qGsi7NSc_ATpi4rg1cER06Ag1YpHq6DvKWux7LWUjGABUG9LgDOzodywqvX6qDWn-Glvc1G7uE-hlq8oo5LRnjPxM2qAKuqDiyWBnnzW6lq0HIvawyXq6h9RdRs7-frR1vnq_41AjgSdYs7Juh-PIVgtg6L-GpTK6f7gaF8ODa3J_Pgf5jdO4ML-
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_931865
crossref_primary_10_1177_01461672251327607
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0312938
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_631800
crossref_primary_10_1111_risa_13833
crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2024_2360491
crossref_primary_10_1080_20445911_2024_2417104
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2023_105434
crossref_primary_10_3390_jintelligence11020027
crossref_primary_10_1111_isj_12453
crossref_primary_10_1513_AnnalsATS_202105_594OC
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1398121
crossref_primary_10_3390_info11120559
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2025_106166
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1930297500008123
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2021_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2021_2010891
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_648328
crossref_primary_10_1080_0020174X_2023_2225544
crossref_primary_10_1111_joes_12604
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2024_04_014
crossref_primary_10_3390_challe14040054
crossref_primary_10_1017_S193029750000855X
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_025_07654_w
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_024_01564_1
crossref_primary_10_1145_3688598
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2022_101387
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2025_102178
crossref_primary_10_1017_jdm_2024_37
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_intell_2022_101705
crossref_primary_10_1017_apa_2023_30
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2023_101727
crossref_primary_10_1177_1368430221990104
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2021_101561
crossref_primary_10_1177_09713336231180961
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2024_105989
crossref_primary_10_1177_20563051231220328
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X22003004
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0258228
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_025_07578_5
crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11081310
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2203149119
crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2021_2008003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13164_023_00716_7
crossref_primary_10_1177_07487304221096390
crossref_primary_10_1002_ejsp_2919
crossref_primary_10_1111_pops_12819
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_17832_3
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_020_20043_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s41235_024_00578_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_jad_12316
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2023_112452
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_025_02271_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2021_104768
crossref_primary_10_1177_01461672221118184
crossref_primary_10_1017_jdm_2025_10008
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1930297500003570
crossref_primary_10_1111_risa_14150
crossref_primary_10_1111_joca_12526
crossref_primary_10_1080_14697017_2021_1861724
crossref_primary_10_1177_03616843231202708
crossref_primary_10_3917_redp_321_0085
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2021_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_4008
crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci15091118
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2020_104513
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_024_07092_0
crossref_primary_10_1177_13684302211014582
crossref_primary_10_3390_bs13110896
crossref_primary_10_1080_08974438_2024_2440724
crossref_primary_10_1177_10888683241251520
crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2020_1837444
crossref_primary_10_1111_sjop_13114
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2023_112155
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_020_01040_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_su122310039
crossref_primary_10_1080_15546128_2024_2410315
Cites_doi 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x
10.1177/0013916505277998
10.1177/1745691613513470
10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002
10.1215/03616878-1460524
10.1111/pops.12407
10.1017/S1930297500005350
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
10.1177/2053168016688122
10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
10.1177/2515245919847202
10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
10.1038/nclimate1547
10.1017/S1930297500005738
10.1037/a0016755
10.1177/0146167217741314
10.1177/0146167218783192
10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161
10.24972/ijts.2004.23.1.94
10.1177/1745691615615317
10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x
10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
10.1037/a0021847
10.1017/S0140525X00003435
10.1177/2053168018822174
10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.497
10.4324/9781315204550
10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
10.1177/1745691617746796
10.1111/cogs.12584
10.1017/S1930297500005271
10.1080/13546783.2017.1378723
10.1017/bpp.2016.2
10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.015
10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.001
10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1
10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
10.1017/S1930297500007622
10.4324/9781315460178
10.1017/S1930297500006999
10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
10.1177/0963721413480174
10.1017/S0140525X10000968
10.1177/2053168016676705
10.1177/0093650217719596
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001
10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011
10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.006
10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02118.x
10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.004
10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.006
10.1111/1468-2508.00161
10.1177/0146167202286008
10.1177/1745691618788876
10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
10.1177/1745691612460685
10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342
10.31234/osf.io/b7kty
10.1177/0146167215600528
10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
10.1177/0146167219841624
10.1037/a0025391
10.1257/089533005775196732
10.1017/CBO9780511809477
10.1371/journal.pone.0153039
10.1017/S1930297500005921
10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
10.1177/0963721415604610
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0008
10.1518/001872008X288385
10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-050904
10.31219/osf.io/ad9v7
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2020 Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Society for Judgment and Decision Making
– notice: 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7WY
7WZ
7XB
87Z
8FK
8FL
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
DWQXO
FRNLG
F~G
GNUQQ
GUQSH
K60
K6~
L.-
M0C
M2O
MBDVC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
Q9U
DOA
DOI 10.1017/S1930297500007439
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni)
Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Essentials
Proquest Central
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Student
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Business Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Global
Research Library
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Databases
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Business (UW System Shared)
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Basic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition)
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList

CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: PIMPY
  name: Publicly Available Content Database
  url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
Religion
EISSN 1930-2975
EndPage 498
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_a88243098c994106aa06a31a54db25d4
A635067436
10_1017_S1930297500007439
GeographicLocations United Kingdom
United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom
– name: United States--US
GroupedDBID 09C
09D
0R~
188
2UF
2WC
5VS
7WY
8FL
8G5
AAFWJ
AASVR
AAXMD
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABGDZ
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABUWG
ABXAU
ABXHF
ACAJB
ACDLN
ACDXY
ACHQT
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADKIL
ADVJH
AEBAK
AFFHD
AFKRA
AFKRZ
AFMMW
AFPKN
AFZFC
AGHGI
AGTDA
AHRGI
AKMAY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATFKH
AZQEC
BCNDV
BENPR
BEZIV
BPHCQ
C1A
CCPQU
CDVRH
CITATION
CNMHZ
DWQXO
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EBS
EJD
EPL
ESX
FRNLG
GNUQQ
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH
GROUPED_DOAJ
GUQSH
H13
IAO
ICO
IEA
IPNFZ
IPY
IPYYG
ITC
K60
K6~
KQ8
M0C
M2O
M~E
OK1
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQQKQ
PROAC
RCA
RIG
ROL
TH9
TR2
TUS
UZ2
3V.
7XB
8FK
AINHJ
JDM
L.-
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-99742d0386e51e5193f167d6cac381d8456e24d75f0cbfdd5e2a69699efbacf73
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 110
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000556907500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1930-2975
IngestDate Tue Oct 14 19:06:18 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 22:39:22 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 13:10:46 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 10:17:25 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 01:34:54 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:14:09 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c482t-99742d0386e51e5193f167d6cac381d8456e24d75f0cbfdd5e2a69699efbacf73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/a88243098c994106aa06a31a54db25d4
PQID 2429428546
PQPubID 696407
PageCount 23
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a88243098c994106aa06a31a54db25d4
proquest_journals_2429428546
gale_infotracmisc_A635067436
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A635067436
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1930297500007439
crossref_citationtrail_10_1017_S1930297500007439
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-07-00
20200701
2020-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-07-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Tallahassee
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Tallahassee
PublicationTitle Judgment and decision making
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Cambridge University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Society for Judgment and Decision Making
– name: Cambridge University Press
References S1930297500007439_rf37
S1930297500007439_rf35
S1930297500007439_rf79
S1930297500007439_rf34
S1930297500007439_rf78
S1930297500007439_rf33
Stanovich (S1930297500007439_rf77) 2005
S1930297500007439_rf76
S1930297500007439_rf31
S1930297500007439_rf75
S1930297500007439_rf74
S1930297500007439_rf39
S1930297500007439_rf38
S1930297500007439_rf73
S1930297500007439_rf70
S1930297500007439_rf25
S1930297500007439_rf69
S1930297500007439_rf24
S1930297500007439_rf68
S1930297500007439_rf67
S1930297500007439_rf23
S1930297500007439_rf22
S1930297500007439_rf21
S1930297500007439_rf20
S1930297500007439_rf64
S1930297500007439_rf63
S1930297500007439_rf29
Bargh (S1930297500007439_rf1) 1999
S1930297500007439_rf28
S1930297500007439_rf2
S1930297500007439_rf62
S1930297500007439_rf61
S1930297500007439_rf60
Haran (S1930297500007439_rf32) 2013; 8
S1930297500007439_rf15
S1930297500007439_rf59
S1930297500007439_rf58
S1930297500007439_rf14
S1930297500007439_rf13
S1930297500007439_rf56
S1930297500007439_rf12
S1930297500007439_rf55
S1930297500007439_rf11
Gigerenzer (S1930297500007439_rf26) 2007
S1930297500007439_rf54
S1930297500007439_rf10
S1930297500007439_rf53
S1930297500007439_rf52
S1930297500007439_rf19
S1930297500007439_rf18
S1930297500007439_rf17
S1930297500007439_rf16
Pennycook (S1930297500007439_rf57) 2015; 10
S1930297500007439_rf3
S1930297500007439_rf6
S1930297500007439_rf7
Perkins (S1930297500007439_rf65) 2019; 14
S1930297500007439_rf8
S1930297500007439_rf9
Baron (S1930297500007439_rf4) 1985
S1930297500007439_rf51
S1930297500007439_rf50
S1930297500007439_rf91
S1930297500007439_rf90
Baron (S1930297500007439_rf5) 2008
S1930297500007439_rf48
S1930297500007439_rf47
S1930297500007439_rf46
S1930297500007439_rf89
Gigerenzer (S1930297500007439_rf27) 1999
S1930297500007439_rf45
S1930297500007439_rf44
Royzman (S1930297500007439_rf72) 2014; 9
Thomson (S1930297500007439_rf88) 2016; 11
S1930297500007439_rf43
S1930297500007439_rf87
S1930297500007439_rf42
S1930297500007439_rf86
S1930297500007439_rf85
S1930297500007439_rf41
Piaget (S1930297500007439_rf66) 1932
Ross (S1930297500007439_rf71) 1996
S1930297500007439_rf49
S1930297500007439_rf40
Kahan (S1930297500007439_rf36) 2013; 8
S1930297500007439_rf84
S1930297500007439_rf83
S1930297500007439_rf82
S1930297500007439_rf81
S1930297500007439_rf80
Haidt (S1930297500007439_rf30) 2012
References_xml – ident: S1930297500007439_rf90
  doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf12
  doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf48
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf33
  doi: 10.1177/0013916505277998
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf13
  doi: 10.1177/1745691613513470
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf3
  doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf83
  doi: 10.1215/03616878-1460524
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf34
  doi: 10.1111/pops.12407
– volume: 14
  start-page: 624
  year: 2019
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf65
  article-title: Learning to reason: The influence of instruction, prompts and scaffolding, metacognitive knowledge, and general intelligence on informal reasoning about everyday social and political issues.
  publication-title: Judgment and Decision Making
  doi: 10.1017/S1930297500005350
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf10
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf6
  doi: 10.1177/2053168016688122
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf86
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf24
  doi: 10.1177/2515245919847202
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf55
  doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf87
  doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf38
  doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547
– volume: 9
  start-page: 176
  year: 2014
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf72
  article-title: Are good reasoners more incest-friendly[202F?]? Trait cognitive reflection predicts selective moralization in a sample of American adults.
  publication-title: Judgment and Decision Making
  doi: 10.1017/S1930297500005738
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf41
  doi: 10.1037/a0016755
– volume-title: The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion
  year: 2012
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf30
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf73
  doi: 10.1177/0146167217741314
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf62
  doi: 10.1177/0146167218783192
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf80
  doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf89
  doi: 10.24972/ijts.2004.23.1.94
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf18
  doi: 10.1177/1745691615615317
– volume-title: Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious
  year: 2007
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf26
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf70
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf56
  doi: 10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf46
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf29
  doi: 10.1037/a0021847
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf81
  doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003435
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf15
  doi: 10.1177/2053168018822174
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf74
  doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.497
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf17
  doi: 10.4324/9781315204550
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf59
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf19
  doi: 10.1177/1745691617746796
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf52
  doi: 10.1111/cogs.12584
– volume: 8
  start-page: 407
  year: 2013
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf36
  article-title: Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection.
  publication-title: Judgment and Decision Making
  doi: 10.1017/S1930297500005271
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf84
  doi: 10.1080/13546783.2017.1378723
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf39
  doi: 10.1017/bpp.2016.2
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf47
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.015
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf50
  doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.001
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf58
  doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf9
  doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf53
  doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
– volume: 11
  start-page: 99
  year: 2016
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf88
  article-title: Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test.
  publication-title: Judgment and Decision Making
  doi: 10.1017/S1930297500007622
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf54
  doi: 10.4324/9781315460178
– volume: 10
  start-page: 549
  year: 2015
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf57
  article-title: On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit.
  publication-title: Judgment and Decision Making
  doi: 10.1017/S1930297500006999
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf14
  doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf82
  doi: 10.1177/0963721413480174
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf51
  doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf45
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf37
  doi: 10.1177/2053168016676705
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf43
  doi: 10.1177/0093650217719596
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf61
  doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf25
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf78
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.006
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf21
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf85
  doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02118.x
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf7
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.004
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf75
  doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.006
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf69
  doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00161
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf68
  doi: 10.1177/0146167202286008
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf8
  doi: 10.1177/1745691618788876
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf63
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf20
  doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
– volume-title: Thinking and deciding
  year: 2008
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf5
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf79
  doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342
– start-page: 361
  volume-title: Dual-process theories in social psychology
  year: 1999
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf1
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf16
  doi: 10.31234/osf.io/b7kty
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf67
  doi: 10.1177/0146167215600528
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf35
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf91
  doi: 10.1177/0146167219841624
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf44
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf76
  doi: 10.1037/a0025391
– volume-title: The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin
  year: 2005
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf77
– volume-title: The moral judgment of the child
  year: 1932
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf66
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf23
  doi: 10.1257/089533005775196732
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf40
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511809477
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf64
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153039
– volume: 8
  start-page: 188
  year: 2013
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf32
  article-title: The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration.
  publication-title: Judgment and Decision Making
  doi: 10.1017/S1930297500005921
– start-page: 103
  volume-title: The Jean Piaget symposium series. Values and knowledge
  year: 1996
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf71
– volume-title: Thinking and learning skills: Vol. II, Research and open questions
  year: 1985
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf4
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf31
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf28
  doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf60
  doi: 10.1177/0963721415604610
– volume-title: Simple heuristics that make us smart
  year: 1999
  ident: S1930297500007439_rf27
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf22
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0008
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf42
  doi: 10.1518/001872008X288385
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf2
  doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf11
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-050904
– ident: S1930297500007439_rf49
  doi: 10.31219/osf.io/ad9v7
SSID ssj0052907
Score 2.5299485
Snippet Does one’s stance toward evidence evaluation and belief revision have relevance for actual beliefs? We investigate the role of endorsing an actively...
Does one's stance toward evidence evaluation and belief revision have relevance for actual beliefs? We investigate the role of endorsing an actively...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 476
SubjectTerms actively open-minded thinking
Belief & doubt
belief revision
Climate change
Critical thinking
Liberalism
meta-beliefs
Political aspects
Political parties
Politics
Religion
United Kingdom
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Proquest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB_qVaQvWqvSq23ZB0GQC-5tNh_ri7TS0r6cRRT6tuxXtFBz7SUV_GP6vzqTbE4PaV_6cLBsNscmmZ35ze7MbwDehEDpjMIkpuAlHTPmiUkLlziDaN6WvPTSdcUmitmsPD9XZ3HDrYlhlYNO7BS1nzvaI3-PpkRJSvfLP15dJ1Q1ik5XYwmNR7BOTGVyBOuHR7OzL4MuzoTqEqYRpfCEckiHc00ijaZO6uO9HVUrlqkj8L9LTXe25_jZQ2e9CU8j6mQHvZg8h7VQb8HGUvn93oInQ2zyC7j9XDOEhcxiT6iwadrYbljzg0pisz5dmBlHvisaP9bOWYj1ST-w03-i1BmCYoY-93Cgj-I-YT-JFmDCiHa8JsxM7T4Oj5qLfiY3zYSZ2rNoo4cpvIRvx0dfP50ksYpD4mQp2kShxyI8T8s8ZNNAgLGa5oXPnXGIFnyJCC4I6Yus4s5W3mdBmFzlSoXKGlcV6SsY1fM6bANz1ltfpQVXFhV8ao0N-EfepwgyRBXUGPjwBbWLFOdUaeNS97Fshf7vo4_h3fKWq57f477BhyQWy4FEzd11zBffdVzp2qDPIlOuSqeURIfbGPylU5NJb0Xm5RjeklBpUiA4OXwNfR4EPiJRcekDhICcUkPyMeyujMSF71YvDzKno-Jp9F-B27n_8mvYELR10EUe78KoXdyEPXjsfrUXzWI_rqM_fqEj8A
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2429428546
https://doaj.org/article/a88243098c994106aa06a31a54db25d4
Volume 15
WOSCitedRecordID wos000556907500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1930-2975
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0052907
  issn: 1930-2975
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1930-2975
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0052907
  issn: 1930-2975
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ABI/INFORM Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1930-2975
  dateEnd: 20221130
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0052907
  issn: 1930-2975
  databaseCode: 7WY
  dateStart: 20060701
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/abicomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ABI/INFORM Global
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1930-2975
  dateEnd: 20221130
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0052907
  issn: 1930-2975
  databaseCode: M0C
  dateStart: 20060701
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/abiglobal
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1930-2975
  dateEnd: 20221130
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0052907
  issn: 1930-2975
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20060701
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1930-2975
  dateEnd: 20221130
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0052907
  issn: 1930-2975
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20060701
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Research Library (Proquest)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1930-2975
  dateEnd: 20221130
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0052907
  issn: 1930-2975
  databaseCode: M2O
  dateStart: 20060701
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/pqrl
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6VlkMvFRQQ25aVD0iV0EZ4nYdjbm21FT10u0Ig2pPlVwQSpNUmrdQL_4T_ykycrLpCwIVDLGvjrLzOeOab9cw3AK9DoHRGYRIjeUnHjEViUukSZxDN25KXPnNdsQk5n5eXl2rxoNQXxYRFeuC4cG8NQsAs5ap0SmXovxiDVzo1eeatyH3HBIqoZ3Cmog7OBfp8wxkmEUQjTKEqTTmPNlOtWaGOrP9PKrmzM6dPYKcHiOwoTuwpbIR6F7ZXeur-Gfy8qBnCNmYD4scKu6bt-w1rvlDJahbTeZlx5FuicWLtNQt9_dB37OxBFDlD0MrQJx4O3FEcJ-w7pe1PGNGC14RpqR_j5Ki7jFHMt82Emdqz3oYOU3gOn05nH0_eJ32VhcRlpWgThR6F8Dwti5BPAwG6alpIXzjj0Jr7EhFWEJmXecWdrbzPgzCFKpQKlTWukukL2Kyv6_ASmLPe-iqVXFlUwKk1NuAXeZ8iCBBVUCPgw6pr11OQUyWMbzrGmkn924sawZvVIzeRf-Nvg4_pVa4GEnV29wEKlO4FSv9LoEZwSIKgaYPj5HAZYp4C_kSiytJHCNE4pW4UIzhYG4kb063fHkRJ94qh0YiIVEZZq8Xe_5jsPmwL-gOgix8-gM12eRtewWN3135tlmN4JD9fjWHreDZffBh3OwTbc35Crbig9scM7y_OzhdXvwACFhV_
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Jb9QwFH4qBUEvLKVVBwr4AEJCE-FxnMVICJVC1VHLwKFIvRlvoZVKpkxSUH8Mf4HfyHtZBkaI3nrgEOnJcSzHecvn-C0Aj0OgcEZhIpPxnI4Z08jEmYucQTRvc5576ZpiE9lkkh8eqg9L8LOPhSG3yl4nNoraTx39I3-OpkRJCvdLX51-jahqFJ2u9iU0WrbYC-ffcctWvRy_we_7RIidtwfbu1FXVSByMhd1pBBBC8_jPA3JKBCAKUZp5lNnHFovnyOiCEL6LCm4s4X3SRAmValSobDGFVmM416Bq1KiOJCrIN_uNX8iVBOejUPyiCJW-1NUSlFNjdTGW6utFuxgUy7gX0ahsXQ7t_63NboNNztMzbZaIbgDS6FchZW5aj9fheu95_Vd-PG-ZAh6mcWWUCBp6o6uWHVEBb9ZGwzNjKOdOZp2Vk9Z6KqvvmDjP3zwGUJ-5pDo3BVQmIfsCyU9GDJKql7SjoDo1suQyFk7k7NqyEzpWYdA-imswcdLWal1WC6nZdgA5qy3vogzriyar9gaG3Ag72OEUKIIagC85xjtugTuVEfkRLeeepn-i8kG8Gz-yGmbveSizq-JDecdKfF40zCdfdadHtMGd2Qy5ip3SskRT43BKx6ZRHorEi8H8JSYWJN6xMnhMrRRHviKlGhMbyHA5RT4kg5gc6EnqjW3eLvncd2p1Ur_ZvB7F99-BDd2D97t6_3xZO8-rAj6SdL4WG_Ccj07Cw_gmvtWH1ezh40EM_h02eLwCxtngBE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On+the+belief+that+beliefs+should+change+according+to+evidence%3A+Implications+for+conspiratorial%2C+moral%2C+paranormal%2C+political%2C+religious%2C+and+science+beliefs&rft.jtitle=Judgment+and+decision+making&rft.au=Pennycook%2C+Gordon&rft.au=Cheyne%2C+James+Allan&rft.au=Koehler%2C+Derek+J&rft.au=Fugelsang%2C+Jonathan+A&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.pub=Society+for+Judgment+and+Decision+Making&rft.issn=1930-2975&rft.eissn=1930-2975&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS1930297500007439&rft.externalDocID=A635067436
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1930-2975&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1930-2975&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1930-2975&client=summon