Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach

In the present study, we employed the three-pronged approach to determine the actual cognitive processes theorized in knowledge revision. First, the Knowledge Revision Components (KReC) framework was identified as the guiding theory. Second, think-aloud analysis highlighted at which points in refuta...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Memory & cognition Ročník 47; číslo 1; s. 33 - 46
Hlavní autori: Kendeou, Panayiota, Butterfuss, Reese, Kim, Jasmine, Van Boekel, Martin
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: New York Springer US 01.01.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Predmet:
Adult
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Beliefs
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Cognitive Psychology
Comprehension - physiology
Credibility
Discrepancies
Female
Humans
Investigations
Knowledge
Language
Male
Memory
Meteors & meteorites
Principles
Psycholinguistics
Psychology
Reading
Thinking - physiology
Young Adult
Think-aloud
Knowledge revision
Cognitive processes
Three-pronged approach
Refutation texts
ISSN:0090-502X, 1532-5946, 1532-5946
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:In the present study, we employed the three-pronged approach to determine the actual cognitive processes theorized in knowledge revision. First, the Knowledge Revision Components (KReC) framework was identified as the guiding theory. Second, think-aloud analysis highlighted at which points in refutation texts readers detected discrepancies between their incorrect, commonsense beliefs and the correct beliefs, and the exact processes with which they dealt with these discrepancies—successfully or unsuccessfully, as indicated by posttest scores. Third, corroborating reading-time data and posttest data demonstrated that the structure of the refutation texts facilitated the coactivation and integration of the explanation with the commonsense belief, resulting in knowledge revision. Finally, an analysis directly connected the processes identified during think-aloud to sentence reading times. These findings systematically identify the cognitive processes theorized during knowledge revision and, in doing so, provide evidence for the conditions for revision outlined in the KReC framework.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-502X
1532-5946
1532-5946
DOI:10.3758/s13421-018-0848-y