Meta-analysis of immune-related adverse events in phase 3 clinical trials assessing immune checkpoint inhibitors for lung cancer

•This meta-analysis of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer showed that immunotherapy is associated with a lower risk of irAEs compared to immuno-chemotherapy, especially when analysis is restricted to monoimmunotherapy.•Drug discontinuation due to irA...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Critical reviews in oncology/hematology Ročník 162; s. 103351
Hlavní autoři: Berti, Alvise, Bortolotti, Roberto, Dipasquale, Mariachiara, Kinspergher, Stefania, Prokop, Larry, Grandi, Guido, Inchiostro, Sandro, Paolazzi, Giuseppe, Caffo, Orazio, Veccia, Antonello
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.06.2021
Témata:
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Immune related adverse event
Immunotherapy - adverse effects
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy
Meta-analysis
Nivolumab - adverse effects
Randomized clinical trials
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Randomized clinical trials
Immune related adverse event
Lung cancer
Meta-analysis
ISSN:1040-8428, 1879-0461, 1879-0461
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:•This meta-analysis of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer showed that immunotherapy is associated with a lower risk of irAEs compared to immuno-chemotherapy, especially when analysis is restricted to monoimmunotherapy.•Drug discontinuation due to irAEs and toxic deaths are also lower in immunotherapy alone than immuno-chemotherapy•Sensitivity analyses does not show a significant influence of histological type, line of therapy or other potentially confounding factors on the reported results•Detailed comparisons between different ICIs showed different organ-specific irAEs, providing treatment-related risk profiles for organ-specific irAEs, potentially helping to guide the choice of the ICI in clinical practice The introduction in clinical practice of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) radically changed the treatment algorithm of lung cancers. To characterize the toxicity of ICIs (atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab) is important for personalizing treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials assessing ICIs, from inception until April 23rd, 2020. We extracted the data from the ICI arm of each trial for indirect comparisons to estimate relative risk for immune-related adverse events (irAEs), severe (grade ≥3) irAEs, drug discontinuation due to irAEs or toxic death. Sixteen trials included a total of 6226 subjects randomized to the experimental immunotherapy arm. Immunotherapy was administered in monotherapy (8 trials), in combination with chemotherapy (6 trials) or other ICI (2 trials). Any grade irAEs and severe irAEs for ICI were 37.1% and 18.5%, respectively. Discontinuations due to any grade irAEs and severe irAEs were 13.8% and 9.2%, respectively; toxic deaths were 2.9% in the immunotherapy arm. Pooled data on any, severe and organ-specific irAEs showed that immunotherapy has a significantly lower risk of irAEs compared to immuno-chemotherapy, especially when analysis was restricted to monoimmunotherapy, like drug discontinuation and toxic death (all p < 0.05). Detailed comparisons between different ICIs provided treatment-related risk profiles for organ-specific irAEs. Our findings contribute to clarifying frequency and features of immune-related toxicities between different ICIs in lung cancer patients, including any grade irAEs, severe irAEs, drug discontinuation and toxic deaths, and may be useful to inform the selection of treatment.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:1040-8428
1879-0461
1879-0461
DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103351