Vaccine hesitancy and Web 2.0: Exploring how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in online threaded user comments

•The CBC forum provides a space for users to reinforce their pre-existing beliefs.•Rhetorical devices and tactics noted in user exchanges reinforces existing polarization.•Public health engagement may further reduce rejecter's intention to vaccinate. The growth of Web 2.0 has been particularly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine Vol. 37; no. 13; pp. 1769 - 1774
Main Authors: Meyer, Samantha B., Violette, Richard, Aggarwal, Reenika, Simeoni, Michelle, MacDougall, Heather, Waite, Nancy
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 22.03.2019
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
ISSN:0264-410X, 1873-2518, 1873-2518
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract •The CBC forum provides a space for users to reinforce their pre-existing beliefs.•Rhetorical devices and tactics noted in user exchanges reinforces existing polarization.•Public health engagement may further reduce rejecter's intention to vaccinate. The growth of Web 2.0 has been particularly impactful in shaping information assessment in decision-making with regards to vaccination. The aim of the present study was to explore how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in Web 2.0 through an analysis of user comment threads in response to related news reports on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation national news website (average of 5.8 million unique visitors per month). User comments (n = 2042) were extracted using a Google Chrome data mining extension, from 33 articles reporting on the seasonal influenza vaccine between September 2015 and October 2016. User comments were analyzed using thematic discourse analysis to identify themes within the data, and also identify how information is exchanged, including identifying the rhetorical devices and tactics used. Mostly unrelated to article content, user comments were extremely polarized with only those with strong positions at either end of the vaccination spectrum (for or against) engaging actively in online debates. Observed exchanges, and the use of rhetorical devices and tactics employed by users are identified as furthering or reinforcing polarization. In addition to exchanging information, forums served as ‘echo chambers’ where individuals connect with likeminded users and collect additional information to reinforce pre-existing beliefs, rather than encouraging the enrichment of user knowledge. Our data lead us to question existing calls for public health engagement in such online forums, as doing so may actually reduce the intention to vaccinate among individuals against vaccination. Rather, we identify a greater need to observe online platforms to better understand the social mechanisms that may contribute to, or reinforce, attitudes and beliefs related to influenza vaccine refusal. Further research may also explore the effect that such dialogue has on the attitudes and beliefs of passively observing individuals who have yet to decide whether to receive the flu vaccine.
AbstractList •The CBC forum provides a space for users to reinforce their pre-existing beliefs.•Rhetorical devices and tactics noted in user exchanges reinforces existing polarization.•Public health engagement may further reduce rejecter's intention to vaccinate. The growth of Web 2.0 has been particularly impactful in shaping information assessment in decision-making with regards to vaccination. The aim of the present study was to explore how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in Web 2.0 through an analysis of user comment threads in response to related news reports on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation national news website (average of 5.8 million unique visitors per month). User comments (n = 2042) were extracted using a Google Chrome data mining extension, from 33 articles reporting on the seasonal influenza vaccine between September 2015 and October 2016. User comments were analyzed using thematic discourse analysis to identify themes within the data, and also identify how information is exchanged, including identifying the rhetorical devices and tactics used. Mostly unrelated to article content, user comments were extremely polarized with only those with strong positions at either end of the vaccination spectrum (for or against) engaging actively in online debates. Observed exchanges, and the use of rhetorical devices and tactics employed by users are identified as furthering or reinforcing polarization. In addition to exchanging information, forums served as ‘echo chambers’ where individuals connect with likeminded users and collect additional information to reinforce pre-existing beliefs, rather than encouraging the enrichment of user knowledge. Our data lead us to question existing calls for public health engagement in such online forums, as doing so may actually reduce the intention to vaccinate among individuals against vaccination. Rather, we identify a greater need to observe online platforms to better understand the social mechanisms that may contribute to, or reinforce, attitudes and beliefs related to influenza vaccine refusal. Further research may also explore the effect that such dialogue has on the attitudes and beliefs of passively observing individuals who have yet to decide whether to receive the flu vaccine.
The growth of Web 2.0 has been particularly impactful in shaping information assessment in decision-making with regards to vaccination. The aim of the present study was to explore how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in Web 2.0 through an analysis of user comment threads in response to related news reports on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation national news website (average of 5.8 million unique visitors per month). User comments (n = 2042) were extracted using a Google Chrome data mining extension, from 33 articles reporting on the seasonal influenza vaccine between September 2015 and October 2016. User comments were analyzed using thematic discourse analysis to identify themes within the data, and also identify how information is exchanged, including identifying the rhetorical devices and tactics used. Mostly unrelated to article content, user comments were extremely polarized with only those with strong positions at either end of the vaccination spectrum (for or against) engaging actively in online debates. Observed exchanges, and the use of rhetorical devices and tactics employed by users are identified as furthering or reinforcing polarization. In addition to exchanging information, forums served as ‘echo chambers’ where individuals connect with likeminded users and collect additional information to reinforce pre-existing beliefs, rather than encouraging the enrichment of user knowledge. Our data lead us to question existing calls for public health engagement in such online forums, as doing so may actually reduce the intention to vaccinate among individuals against vaccination. Rather, we identify a greater need to observe online platforms to better understand the social mechanisms that may contribute to, or reinforce, attitudes and beliefs related to influenza vaccine refusal. Further research may also explore the effect that such dialogue has on the attitudes and beliefs of passively observing individuals who have yet to decide whether to receive the flu vaccine.
The growth of Web 2.0 has been particularly impactful in shaping information assessment in decision-making with regards to vaccination. The aim of the present study was to explore how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in Web 2.0 through an analysis of user comment threads in response to related news reports on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation national news website (average of 5.8 million unique visitors per month). User comments (n = 2042) were extracted using a Google Chrome data mining extension, from 33 articles reporting on the seasonal influenza vaccine between September 2015 and October 2016. User comments were analyzed using thematic discourse analysis to identify themes within the data, and also identify how information is exchanged, including identifying the rhetorical devices and tactics used. Mostly unrelated to article content, user comments were extremely polarized with only those with strong positions at either end of the vaccination spectrum (for or against) engaging actively in online debates. Observed exchanges, and the use of rhetorical devices and tactics employed by users are identified as furthering or reinforcing polarization. In addition to exchanging information, forums served as 'echo chambers' where individuals connect with likeminded users and collect additional information to reinforce pre-existing beliefs, rather than encouraging the enrichment of user knowledge. Our data lead us to question existing calls for public health engagement in such online forums, as doing so may actually reduce the intention to vaccinate among individuals against vaccination. Rather, we identify a greater need to observe online platforms to better understand the social mechanisms that may contribute to, or reinforce, attitudes and beliefs related to influenza vaccine refusal. Further research may also explore the effect that such dialogue has on the attitudes and beliefs of passively observing individuals who have yet to decide whether to receive the flu vaccine.The growth of Web 2.0 has been particularly impactful in shaping information assessment in decision-making with regards to vaccination. The aim of the present study was to explore how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in Web 2.0 through an analysis of user comment threads in response to related news reports on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation national news website (average of 5.8 million unique visitors per month). User comments (n = 2042) were extracted using a Google Chrome data mining extension, from 33 articles reporting on the seasonal influenza vaccine between September 2015 and October 2016. User comments were analyzed using thematic discourse analysis to identify themes within the data, and also identify how information is exchanged, including identifying the rhetorical devices and tactics used. Mostly unrelated to article content, user comments were extremely polarized with only those with strong positions at either end of the vaccination spectrum (for or against) engaging actively in online debates. Observed exchanges, and the use of rhetorical devices and tactics employed by users are identified as furthering or reinforcing polarization. In addition to exchanging information, forums served as 'echo chambers' where individuals connect with likeminded users and collect additional information to reinforce pre-existing beliefs, rather than encouraging the enrichment of user knowledge. Our data lead us to question existing calls for public health engagement in such online forums, as doing so may actually reduce the intention to vaccinate among individuals against vaccination. Rather, we identify a greater need to observe online platforms to better understand the social mechanisms that may contribute to, or reinforce, attitudes and beliefs related to influenza vaccine refusal. Further research may also explore the effect that such dialogue has on the attitudes and beliefs of passively observing individuals who have yet to decide whether to receive the flu vaccine.
Author Aggarwal, Reenika
MacDougall, Heather
Waite, Nancy
Meyer, Samantha B.
Simeoni, Michelle
Violette, Richard
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Samantha B.
  surname: Meyer
  fullname: Meyer, Samantha B.
  email: Samantha.meyer@uwaterloo.ca
  organization: School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Richard
  surname: Violette
  fullname: Violette, Richard
  organization: School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Canada
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Reenika
  surname: Aggarwal
  fullname: Aggarwal, Reenika
  organization: School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Canada
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Michelle
  surname: Simeoni
  fullname: Simeoni, Michelle
  organization: School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Canada
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Heather
  surname: MacDougall
  fullname: MacDougall, Heather
  organization: Department of History, University of Waterloo, Canada
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Nancy
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3440-9843
  surname: Waite
  fullname: Waite, Nancy
  organization: School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Canada
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30826142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkctu1DAYRi1URKeFRwBZYsMmgy9x4oAQQlW5SJXYcNtZjvOn4yFjT22ndHgH3hmHDCxmM0iWbFnn-3w5Z-jEeQcIPaZkSQmtnq-Xt9oY62DJCG2WhOUh76EFlTUvmKDyBC0Iq8qipOTbKTqLcU0IEZw2D9ApJ5JVtGQL9OvL3IJXEG3Szuywdh3-Ci3OjS_w5d128MG6a7zyP7BOyaaxg_gHamGw0Od168eEreuHEdxPjeeL6WS9wzoAhjuz0u4ausxg74bpuLQKoLu8NUYI2PjNBlyKD9H9Xg8RHu3nc_T57eWni_fF1cd3Hy7eXBWmlCQVoGXTcCgbID0D3beyF9C0HTWmraSWwjBKa2YEiJZzUom-r0hfN1y3omG15ufo2dy7Df5mhJjUxkYDw6Ad-DEqxngtOCOCHEfzhzeC1Zxm9OkBuvZjcPkhE9VkkEqeqSd7amw30KltsBsdduqvkwyIGTDBxxig_4dQoib3aq327tXkXhGWh8y5lwc5k41OFlLQdjiafj2nIf_7rYWgorHgDHQ2gEmq8_Zow6uDBpNVW6OH77D7j_xvxqTjQA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11061052
crossref_primary_10_2196_40701
crossref_primary_10_1017_dmp_2023_105
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2020_113187
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0273346
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2021_667627
crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines10122085
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2022_115275
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vaccine_2022_03_024
crossref_primary_10_1080_07481187_2022_2101074
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_022_08008_z
crossref_primary_10_1177_1329878X20975786
crossref_primary_10_1177_2150132720932722
crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSE_2022_3185785
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vaccine_2022_10_037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_zefq_2022_11_010
crossref_primary_10_1177_17151635211005763
crossref_primary_10_1080_17538068_2020_1858222
crossref_primary_10_1177_09636625241252561
crossref_primary_10_3390_soc14040053
crossref_primary_10_2196_37300
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191610096
crossref_primary_10_1177_20539517211013867
crossref_primary_10_3389_ijph_2023_1606514
crossref_primary_10_3233_WOR_220244
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vaccine_2020_01_085
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_023_01644_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_17441692_2019_1680724
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2022_107649
crossref_primary_10_2196_50551
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_1003553
crossref_primary_10_3916_C69_2021_02
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_japh_2021_04_011
crossref_primary_10_1177_09579265231174793
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph182413028
crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines9010028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vaccine_2020_12_039
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025
10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036
10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567
10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
10.1080/10810730.2017.1312720
10.1093/her/cys110
10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.006
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
10.2196/jmir.7.2.e17
10.17730/0018-7259.76.1.38
10.1080/01459740.2016.1145219
10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.072
10.1542/peds.2013-2365
10.1371/currents.outbreaks.6844c80ff9f5b273f34c91f71b7fc289
10.1080/02646839908404585
10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.127
10.14745/ccdr.v42i12a02
10.1145/332040.332409
10.1007/s11251-012-9230-9
10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.104
10.1080/10810730.2016.1222038
10.1177/0891243214532711
10.1177/1359105309353647
10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002199
10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.039
10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01079.x
10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.09.029
10.1111/maq.12214
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 22, 2019
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 22, 2019
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7QL
7RV
7T2
7T5
7U9
7X7
7XB
88C
88E
8AO
8C1
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
H94
HCIFZ
K9-
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0R
M0S
M0T
M1P
M2O
M7N
M7P
MBDVC
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)
Immunology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Research Library Prep
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
Consumer Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Biological Sciences
Consumer Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Healthcare Administration Database
Medical Database
Research Library
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Research Library (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
Health Research Premium Collection
Natural Science Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Family Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Research Library
Health & Safety Science Abstracts
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Health Management
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
Immunology Abstracts
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

AGRICOLA
PubMed
Research Library Prep
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Veterinary Medicine
Biology
Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
Public Health
EISSN 1873-2518
EndPage 1774
ExternalDocumentID 30826142
10_1016_j_vaccine_2019_02_028
S0264410X19302233
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P~
9JM
AAAJQ
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAHBH
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AARKO
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABKYH
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABRWV
ABUWG
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACLOT
ACMHX
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADFRT
ADSLC
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEUYN
AEVXI
AEXOQ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGEKW
AGGSO
AGUBO
AGWPP
AGYEJ
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
AQUVI
AXJTR
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BKNYI
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CJTIS
CNWQP
CS3
DWQXO
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HMCUK
IHE
J1W
K9-
KOM
L7B
LK8
LUGTX
LW9
M0R
M0T
M1P
M29
M2O
M41
M7P
MO0
N9A
NAPCQ
O-L
O9-
O9~
OAUVE
OK0
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q38
ROL
RPZ
SAB
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SNL
SPCBC
SSH
SSI
SSZ
T5K
UKHRP
UV1
WH7
WOW
Z5R
~G-
~HD
3V.
AACTN
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AESVU
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
LCYCR
QYZTP
RIG
.GJ
29Q
9DU
AAQXK
AAYXX
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACRPL
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AFFHD
AFJKZ
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AHHHB
AIGII
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
CITATION
FEDTE
FGOYB
G-2
HEJ
HLV
HMG
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HX~
HZ~
R2-
SAE
SEW
SIN
SVS
WUQ
XPP
ZGI
ZXP
ALIPV
NPM
7QL
7T2
7T5
7U9
7XB
8FK
C1K
H94
K9.
M7N
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
PUEGO
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-ea8993e49e0f2eafb8f5e9bd1ccb68a85c21172c5e5b33065ff60f793ab5927a3
IEDL.DBID M7P
ISICitedReferencesCount 42
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000462691700007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0264-410X
1873-2518
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 13:10:36 EST 2025
Sat Sep 27 21:24:01 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 14:27:05 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:06 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:25:56 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:29:03 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:35:15 EST 2024
Tue Oct 14 19:30:28 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 13
Keywords Scraping software
Web 2.0
Vaccine hesitancy
Influenza vaccine
Health communication
Language English
License Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c480t-ea8993e49e0f2eafb8f5e9bd1ccb68a85c21172c5e5b33065ff60f793ab5927a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-3440-9843
PMID 30826142
PQID 2189187183
PQPubID 105530
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2237532050
proquest_miscellaneous_2187952731
proquest_journals_2189187183
pubmed_primary_30826142
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vaccine_2019_02_028
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_vaccine_2019_02_028
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_vaccine_2019_02_028
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_vaccine_2019_02_028
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-03-22
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-03-22
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-03-22
  day: 22
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
– name: Kidlington
PublicationTitle Vaccine
PublicationTitleAlternate Vaccine
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Witteman, Zikmund-Fisher (b0040) 2012; 30
Schmid, Rauber, Betsch, Lidolt, Denker (b0075) 2017
Kata (b0070) 2010; 28
Salathé, Khandelwal (b0130) 2011; 7
Nonnecke B, Preece J. Lurker demographics: counting the silent. In: Proceedings of CHi 2000. ACM, The Hague; 2000.
Betsch, Brewer, Brocard, Davies, Gaissmaier, Haase (b0165) 2012; 30
Meyer, Lu, Hoffman-Goetz, Smale, MacDougall, Pearce (b0080) 2016; 21
Broniatowski, Jamison, Qi, AlKulaib, Chen, Benton (b0120) 2018; 108
Mercer (b0145) 2012
Wise, Speer, Marbouti, Hsiao (b0160) 2013; 41
Sobo (b0140) 2015; 29
Sobo, Huhn, Sannwald, Thurman (b0030) 2016; 35
Nicholson, Leask (b0060) 2012; 30
CBC Radio. Our History.
Corporation CB. CBC Policies.
LLC SIL. Data Miner; 2018.
Nyhan, Reifer, Richey, Freed (b0135) 2014; 133
Ward, Attwell, Meyer, Rokkas, Leask (b0025) 2017
Zimmerman, Wolfe, Fox, Fox, Nowalk, Troy (b0170) 2005; 7
MacDonald, SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy (b0005) 2015; 33
Dube, Gagnon, Kiely, Defay, Guay, Boulianne (b0090) 2014; 42
Singer, Hunter (b0095) 1999; 17
Peretti-Watel, Larson, Ward, Schulz, Verger (b0010) 2015
Kaufman (b0050) 2010; 38
Brown, Long, Ramsay, Hudson, Green, Vincent (b0150) 2012; 30
CBC/Radio-Canada; 2017.
Kata (b0065) 2012; 30
Dixon, Clarke (b0175) 2013; 28
Braun, Clarke (b0100) 2006; 3
Dubé, Bettinger, Fisher, Naus, Mahmud, Hilderman (b0015) 2016; 42
Betsch, Renkewitz, Betsch, Ulshofer (b0055) 2010; 15
Brunson (b0035) 2013; 31
Brunson, Sobo (b0020) 2017; 76
Meyer, Lum (b0085) 2017; 22
Reich (b0045) 2014; 28
2018.
Faasse, Chatman, Martin (b0125) 2016; 34
Brunson (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0020) 2017; 76
Broniatowski (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0120) 2018; 108
Salathé (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0130) 2011; 7
Zimmerman (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0170) 2005; 7
Faasse (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0125) 2016; 34
Meyer (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0080) 2016; 21
Kata (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0070) 2010; 28
Braun (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0100) 2006; 3
Schmid (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0075) 2017
Peretti-Watel (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0010) 2015
Betsch (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0165) 2012; 30
Nicholson (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0060) 2012; 30
Witteman (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0040) 2012; 30
Reich (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0045) 2014; 28
10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0115
Sobo (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0140) 2015; 29
Brunson (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0035) 2013; 31
Brown (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0150) 2012; 30
Sobo (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0030) 2016; 35
Mercer (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0145) 2012
Ward (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0025) 2017
Kaufman (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0050) 2010; 38
10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0110
Betsch (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0055) 2010; 15
10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0155
Wise (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0160) 2013; 41
Singer (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0095) 1999; 17
Dixon (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0175) 2013; 28
Nyhan (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0135) 2014; 133
MacDonald (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0005) 2015; 33
Kata (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0065) 2012; 30
Dube (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0090) 2014; 42
10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0105
Dubé (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0015) 2016; 42
Meyer (10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0085) 2017; 22
References_xml – volume: 31
  start-page: 5466
  year: 2013
  end-page: 5470
  ident: b0035
  article-title: How parents make decisions abotu their children's vaccinations
  publication-title: Vaccine
– reference: Nonnecke B, Preece J. Lurker demographics: counting the silent. In: Proceedings of CHi 2000. ACM, The Hague; 2000.
– reference: : CBC/Radio-Canada; 2017.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 4161
  year: 2015
  end-page: 4164
  ident: b0005
  article-title: Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants
  publication-title: Vaccine
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1855
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1864
  ident: b0150
  article-title: UK parents’ decision-making about Measles–Mumps–Rubella (MMR) vaccine 10 years after the MMR-autism controversy: a qualitative analysis
  publication-title: Vaccine
– volume: 17
  start-page: 63
  year: 1999
  end-page: 81
  ident: b0095
  article-title: The experience of premature menopause: a thematic discourse analysis
  publication-title: J Reprod Infant Psychol
– volume: 7
  start-page: e17
  year: 2005
  ident: b0170
  article-title: Vaccine criticism on the world wide web
  publication-title: J Med Internet Res
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3734
  year: 2012
  end-page: 3740
  ident: b0040
  article-title: The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vacciantion debate
  publication-title: Vaccine
– volume: 34
  start-page: 5808
  year: 2016
  end-page: 5814
  ident: b0125
  article-title: A comparison of language use in pro- and anti-vaccination comments in response to a high profile Facebook post
  publication-title: Vaccine
– volume: 41
  start-page: 323
  year: 2013
  end-page: 343
  ident: b0160
  article-title: Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors
  publication-title: Instr Sci
– year: 2017
  ident: b0025
  article-title: Risk, responsibility and negative responses: a qualitative study of parental trust in childhood vaccinations
  publication-title: J Risk Res
– reference: LLC SIL. Data Miner; 2018.
– reference: CBC Radio. Our History.
– volume: 42
  start-page: e55
  year: 2014
  end-page: e59
  ident: b0090
  article-title: Seasonal influenze vaccination uptake in Quebec, Canada, 2 years after the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic
  publication-title: Am J Infect Control
– reference: ; 2018.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3806
  year: 2012
  end-page: 3812
  ident: b0060
  article-title: Lessons from an online debate about measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) immunization
  publication-title: Vaccine
– year: 2012
  ident: b0145
  article-title: RMR: Rick's Rant - Flu Shot
– volume: 42
  start-page: 246
  year: 2016
  end-page: 251
  ident: b0015
  article-title: Vaccine acceptance, hesitancy and refusal in Canada: challenges and potential approaches
  publication-title: Can Commun Disease Report
– volume: 76
  start-page: 38
  year: 2017
  end-page: 47
  ident: b0020
  article-title: Framing childhood vaccination in the United States: getting past poliarization in the public discourse
  publication-title: Human Organ
– volume: 30
  year: 2012
  ident: b0065
  article-title: Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradign – an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement
  publication-title: Vaccine
– volume: 21
  year: 2016
  ident: b0080
  article-title: A content analysis of newspaper coverage of the seasonal flu vaccine in Ontario Canada, October 2001 to March 2011
  publication-title: J Health Commun
– volume: 15
  start-page: 446
  year: 2010
  end-page: 455
  ident: b0055
  article-title: The influence of vaccine-critical website on perceiving vaccination risks
  publication-title: J Health Psychol
– volume: 38
  start-page: 8
  year: 2010
  end-page: 32
  ident: b0050
  article-title: Regarding the rise in autism: vaccine safety doubt, conditions of inquiry, and the shape of freedom
  publication-title: Ethos
– volume: 3
  start-page: 77
  year: 2006
  end-page: 101
  ident: b0100
  article-title: Using thematic analysis in psychology
  publication-title: Qualitat Res Psychol
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3727
  year: 2012
  end-page: 3733
  ident: b0165
  article-title: Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions
  publication-title: Vaccine
– volume: 28
  start-page: 352
  year: 2013
  end-page: 359
  ident: b0175
  article-title: The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions
  publication-title: Health Educ Res
– year: 2015
  ident: b0010
  article-title: Vaccine hesitancy: clarifying a theoretical framework for an ambiguous notion
  publication-title: PloS Current Outbreaks
– volume: 133
  start-page: e835
  year: 2014
  end-page: e842
  ident: b0135
  article-title: Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial
  publication-title: Pediatrics
– volume: 22
  start-page: 506
  year: 2017
  end-page: 514
  ident: b0085
  article-title: Explanations for not receiving the seasonal influenza vaccine: an Ontario Canada based survey
  publication-title: J. Health Commun.
– volume: 29
  start-page: 381
  year: 2015
  end-page: 399
  ident: b0140
  article-title: Social cultivation of vaccine refusal and delay among Waldorf (Steiner) School parents
  publication-title: Med Anthropol Q
– volume: 28
  start-page: 679
  year: 2014
  end-page: 704
  ident: b0045
  article-title: Neoliberal mothering and vaccine refusal: imagined gated communities and the privilege of choice
  publication-title: Gender Soc
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1709
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1716
  ident: b0070
  article-title: A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet
  publication-title: Vaccine
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1378
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1384
  ident: b0120
  article-title: Weaponized health communication: twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
– year: 2017
  ident: b0075
  article-title: Barriers to influenza vaccination intention and behavior – a systematic review of influenza vaccine hesitancy, 2005–2016
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 35
  start-page: 529
  year: 2016
  end-page: 546
  ident: b0030
  article-title: Information curation among vaccine cautious parents: Web 2.0, Pinterest thinking, and pediatric vaccination chooice
  publication-title: Med Anthropol
– reference: Corporation CB. CBC Policies.
– volume: 7
  start-page: e1002199
  year: 2011
  ident: b0130
  article-title: Assessing vaccination sentiments with online social media: implication for infectious disease dynamics control
  publication-title: PLoS Comput Biol
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3727
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0165
  article-title: Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025
– volume: 33
  start-page: 4161
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0005
  article-title: Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1378
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0120
  article-title: Weaponized health communication: twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1709
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0070
  article-title: A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
– volume: 22
  start-page: 506
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0085
  article-title: Explanations for not receiving the seasonal influenza vaccine: an Ontario Canada based survey
  publication-title: J. Health Commun.
  doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1312720
– volume: 28
  start-page: 352
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0175
  article-title: The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions
  publication-title: Health Educ Res
  doi: 10.1093/her/cys110
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0025
  article-title: Risk, responsibility and negative responses: a qualitative study of parental trust in childhood vaccinations
  publication-title: J Risk Res
– volume: 42
  start-page: e55
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0090
  article-title: Seasonal influenze vaccination uptake in Quebec, Canada, 2 years after the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic
  publication-title: Am J Infect Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.006
– volume: 3
  start-page: 77
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0100
  article-title: Using thematic analysis in psychology
  publication-title: Qualitat Res Psychol
  doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
– volume: 7
  start-page: e17
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0170
  article-title: Vaccine criticism on the world wide web
  publication-title: J Med Internet Res
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e17
– volume: 76
  start-page: 38
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0020
  article-title: Framing childhood vaccination in the United States: getting past poliarization in the public discourse
  publication-title: Human Organ
  doi: 10.17730/0018-7259.76.1.38
– ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0115
– volume: 35
  start-page: 529
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0030
  article-title: Information curation among vaccine cautious parents: Web 2.0, Pinterest thinking, and pediatric vaccination chooice
  publication-title: Med Anthropol
  doi: 10.1080/01459740.2016.1145219
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3806
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0060
  article-title: Lessons from an online debate about measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) immunization
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.072
– volume: 133
  start-page: e835
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0135
  article-title: Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2365
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0010
  article-title: Vaccine hesitancy: clarifying a theoretical framework for an ambiguous notion
  publication-title: PloS Current Outbreaks
  doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.6844c80ff9f5b273f34c91f71b7fc289
– volume: 17
  start-page: 63
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0095
  article-title: The experience of premature menopause: a thematic discourse analysis
  publication-title: J Reprod Infant Psychol
  doi: 10.1080/02646839908404585
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0145
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1855
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0150
  article-title: UK parents’ decision-making about Measles–Mumps–Rubella (MMR) vaccine 10 years after the MMR-autism controversy: a qualitative analysis
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.127
– volume: 42
  start-page: 246
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0015
  article-title: Vaccine acceptance, hesitancy and refusal in Canada: challenges and potential approaches
  publication-title: Can Commun Disease Report
  doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v42i12a02
– ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0155
  doi: 10.1145/332040.332409
– volume: 41
  start-page: 323
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0160
  article-title: Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors
  publication-title: Instr Sci
  doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9230-9
– volume: 31
  start-page: 5466
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0035
  article-title: How parents make decisions abotu their children's vaccinations
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.104
– ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0105
– volume: 21
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0080
  article-title: A content analysis of newspaper coverage of the seasonal flu vaccine in Ontario Canada, October 2001 to March 2011
  publication-title: J Health Commun
  doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1222038
– volume: 28
  start-page: 679
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0045
  article-title: Neoliberal mothering and vaccine refusal: imagined gated communities and the privilege of choice
  publication-title: Gender Soc
  doi: 10.1177/0891243214532711
– volume: 15
  start-page: 446
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0055
  article-title: The influence of vaccine-critical website on perceiving vaccination risks
  publication-title: J Health Psychol
  doi: 10.1177/1359105309353647
– volume: 30
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0065
  article-title: Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradign – an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
– volume: 7
  start-page: e1002199
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0130
  article-title: Assessing vaccination sentiments with online social media: implication for infectious disease dynamics control
  publication-title: PLoS Comput Biol
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002199
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0075
  article-title: Barriers to influenza vaccination intention and behavior – a systematic review of influenza vaccine hesitancy, 2005–2016
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3734
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0040
  article-title: The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vacciantion debate
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.039
– ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0110
– volume: 38
  start-page: 8
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0050
  article-title: Regarding the rise in autism: vaccine safety doubt, conditions of inquiry, and the shape of freedom
  publication-title: Ethos
  doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01079.x
– volume: 34
  start-page: 5808
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0125
  article-title: A comparison of language use in pro- and anti-vaccination comments in response to a high profile Facebook post
  publication-title: Vaccine
  doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.09.029
– volume: 29
  start-page: 381
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028_b0140
  article-title: Social cultivation of vaccine refusal and delay among Waldorf (Steiner) School parents
  publication-title: Med Anthropol Q
  doi: 10.1111/maq.12214
SSID ssj0005319
Score 2.4628193
Snippet •The CBC forum provides a space for users to reinforce their pre-existing beliefs.•Rhetorical devices and tactics noted in user exchanges reinforces existing...
The growth of Web 2.0 has been particularly impactful in shaping information assessment in decision-making with regards to vaccination. The aim of the present...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1769
SubjectTerms Aluminum
Attitudes
attitudes and opinions
Data mining
Data processing
Decision making
Health communication
Immunoglobulins
Influenza
influenza vaccination
Influenza vaccine
influenza vaccines
Internet
Knowledge
News
Participation
Public health
Scraping software
Social networks
Tactics
Vaccination
Vaccine hesitancy
Vaccines
Web 2.0
Websites
Title Vaccine hesitancy and Web 2.0: Exploring how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in online threaded user comments
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0264410X19302233
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30826142
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2189187183
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2187952731
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2237532050
Volume 37
WOSCitedRecordID wos000462691700007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 20091030
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Biological Science Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 20251009
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: M7P
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Consumer Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 20251009
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: M0R
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/familyhealth
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 20251009
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Healthcare Administration Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 20251009
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: M0T
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthmanagement
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 20251009
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: 7RV
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 20251009
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Public Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 20251009
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: 8C1
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/publichealth
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Research Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1873-2518
  dateEnd: 20251009
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005319
  issn: 0264-410X
  databaseCode: M2O
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/pqrl
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-xDRAS4qN8FUZ1SGhPy5Y4SePwgmDaxAMr1VRK3yLHsbVNKB1tNxj_A_8zd3bSvsCGhFSd-uGLrNP157N99zuA16G1yqSSeVvzPEgqLlbW1gbWZkrnBA7WEZiOP2aDgZxM8mFz4DZv0ipbTHRAXU01n5Hv0lKURxTdy_jt2beAu0bx7WrTQmMNNpglQbjUveEqxSN2jT1om5EESRROVhU8u6c7F0rz1TVnd-WOtpMbsv95bfpb7OnWoIP7_zv7B3CviT7xnXeXh3DD1B245ftRXnbg9mFz096BraHntL7cxtGqRGu-jVs4XLFdk85df_CHvp6pA50xJ9i4Kl9sH_cIfo29HfCY-xAwoqOqK_xiSiSbvMFlKiAeT7-jWnACQ2XmblBpKE629J5zqPHEd1X5qdCb1nkWqplB88NXMVc0Bj0DCC7IVVVFX_FhDJKtXEXfY_h8sD_a-xA0nSACnchwERhFnhSbJDehFUbZUtrU5GUVaV32pZKppn1sJnRq0jKmTVBqbT-0BD2qTHORqfgJrNfT2jwDpC1cafqRLoVNklgSHGXWyMykKtY2LpMuJK0PFLqhSeduHV-LNh_utGhcp2DXKUJBL9mFnaXamecJuU6h3zpY0RbBEmwXtJJdpyiXik2U5KOff1HdbL2zaKBqXqxcswuvlj8TyPDNkarN9NyNyXKm6ouuGCPijLuMpGEXnvp_ydISzIlEcaB4fvUEXsAdni2n-AmxCeuL2bl5CTf1xeJkPuvBWnY0ZjnJnJQk5V7Ug433-4PhEX06DL0csRSfeg4NfgNBy2HZ
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEB6V8pQQj_AKFBgk6KlunbUdr5EQQkDVqkmUQwi5mfV6V22FnJKkLeE_8Ff4jcx47eQCLZcekHKIkh1rtTuvXc98H8BL31plIsm4rUnihTk3K2trPWtjpRNyDrYEMB124l5PjkZJfwV-1b0wXFZZ-8TSUedjzXfkWxSKkhZl9zJ4e_TNY9YofrtaU2g4tdgz81M6sk3f7H6g_X0lxPbHwfsdr2IV8HQo_ZlnFM0qMGFifCuMspm0kUmyvKV11pZKRprORLHQkYmygHnVrW37ltRYZVEiYhXQcy_BZcbVY6z-rj9YlpQEJZEIHWtCL2z5o2XH0Nbh5onS_Kqcq8mSEiaUCeD_HAv_luuWMW_79v-2WnfgVpVd4ztnDndhxRQNuOr4NucNuNatKgkasN53mN3zDRwsW9CmG7iO_SWaN8ncdBeb6Pq1GtAYcgFR2cWM9ePuwc-hW3fcZ54Fjlioihw_mwxpD17jotQR98enqGZcoJGbaTkoM3QOsPSda8TxwLHG_FDotrK0HFQTg-a769LOaQw6hBOckSmqnH7iyyakvSk7Fu_DpwtZ5QewWowL8wiQjqiZabd0JmwYBpLcbWyNjE2kAm2DLGxCWOtcqisYeGYj-ZrW9X6HaaWqKatq6gv6yCZsLsSOHA7KeQLtWqHTusmXwlJKkfo8QbkQrLJAl939i-habQ1p5Yqn6dIUmvBi8Tc5UX4zpgozPi7HxAlDEbbOGCOCmFlUIr8JD51VLlaCMZ8ozxWPz57Ac7i-M-h20s5ub-8J3OCZczmjEGuwOpscm6dwRZ_MDqaTZ6VfQfhy0ab5G2zruFA
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEB6VAhUS4hFegQKDBD3Vjb22YxsJIUSJqNpGEWpDbma93lVboaQkaUv4D_whfh0zu3ZygZZLD0g5RMmOtfLOa3e_-QbgpW-M1HHKvK1Z5kUlFysrYzxjEqkycg7GEpj2d5JuNx0Mst4S_KprYRhWWftE66jLkeIz8haFoiyg7D4NW6aCRfQ2O2-Pv3ncQYpvWut2Gk5FtvXsjLZvkzdbm7TWr4TofNh7_9GrOgx4Kkr9qaclzTDUUaZ9I7Q0RWpinRVloFTRTmUaK9ofJULFOi5C7rFuTNs3pNKyiDORyJCeewWuJlEsmLd_1_-0gJeEtqkIbXEiLwr8waJ6qHW0cSoVX5szsiyzlKHcDP7PcfFvea-Nf53b__ObuwO3qqwb3zkzuQtLetiA664P56wBK7sVwqABaz3H5T1bx71FadpkHdewt2D5Jpmb7sATXR1XAxp9BhbZ6masH3cPfvbdGuAB91_gSIZyWOJnXSCtx2ucQyDxYHSGcsrAjVJP7KBC0_7A0HfGjuOh6ybzQ6JbVmtRKMca9XdXvV3SGHTMJzglE5Ul_cSHUEjrZCsZ78P-pbzlB7A8HA31I0Dauha6HahCmCgKU3LDidFpomMZKhMWUROiWv9yVdHDc5eSr3mNAzzKK7XNWW1zX9AnbcLGXOzY8aNcJNCulTuvi38pXOUUwS8STOeCVXbosr5_EV2tLSOvXPQkX5hFE17M_ybnyjdmcqhHJ3ZMkjFFYXDOGBEm3F0l9pvw0Fno_E0wFxTlv-Lx-RN4DitkkfnOVnf7CdzgiTPKUYhVWJ6OT_RTuKZOp4eT8TPrYhC-XLZl_gaTB8EQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaccine+hesitancy+and+Web+2.0%3A+Exploring+how+attitudes+and+beliefs+about+influenza+vaccination+are+exchanged+in+online+threaded+user+comments&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Meyer%2C+Samantha+B.&rft.au=Violette%2C+Richard&rft.au=Aggarwal%2C+Reenika&rft.au=Simeoni%2C+Michelle&rft.date=2019-03-22&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1769&rft.epage=1774&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.vaccine.2019.02.028&rft.externalDocID=S0264410X19302233
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0264-410X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0264-410X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0264-410X&client=summon