Finding a Fit: Biological Science Doctoral Students' Selection of a Principal Investigator and Research Laboratory

In the laboratory-based disciplines, selection of a principal investigator (PI) and research laboratory (lab) indelibly shapes doctoral students' experiences and educational outcomes. Framed by the theoretical concept of person-environment fit from within a socialization model, we use an induct...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:CBE life sciences education Ročník 19; číslo 3; s. ar31
Hlavní autoři: Maher, Michelle A, Wofford, Annie M, Roksa, Josipa, Feldon, David F
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States 01.09.2020
Témata:
ISSN:1931-7913, 1931-7913
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract In the laboratory-based disciplines, selection of a principal investigator (PI) and research laboratory (lab) indelibly shapes doctoral students' experiences and educational outcomes. Framed by the theoretical concept of person-environment fit from within a socialization model, we use an inductive, qualitative approach to explore how a sample of 42 early-stage doctoral students enrolled in biological sciences programs made decisions about fitting with a PI and within a lab. Results illuminated a complex array of factors that students considered in selecting a PI, including PI relationship, mentoring style, and professional stability. Further, with regard to students' lab selection, peers and research projects played an important role. Students actively conceptualized trade-offs among various dimensions of fit. Our findings also revealed cases in which students did not secure a position in their first (or second) choice labs and had to consider their potential fit with suboptimal placements (in terms of their initial assessments). Thus, these students weighted different factors of fit against the reality of needing to secure financial support to continue in their doctoral programs. We conclude by presenting and framing implications for students, PIs, and doctoral programs, and recommend providing transparency and candor around the PI and lab selection processes.
AbstractList In the laboratory-based disciplines, selection of a principal investigator (PI) and research laboratory (lab) indelibly shapes doctoral students' experiences and educational outcomes. Framed by the theoretical concept of person-environment fit from within a socialization model, we use an inductive, qualitative approach to explore how a sample of 42 early-stage doctoral students enrolled in biological sciences programs made decisions about fitting with a PI and within a lab. Results illuminated a complex array of factors that students considered in selecting a PI, including PI relationship, mentoring style, and professional stability. Further, with regard to students' lab selection, peers and research projects played an important role. Students actively conceptualized trade-offs among various dimensions of fit. Our findings also revealed cases in which students did not secure a position in their first (or second) choice labs and had to consider their potential fit with suboptimal placements (in terms of their initial assessments). Thus, these students weighted different factors of fit against the reality of needing to secure financial support to continue in their doctoral programs. We conclude by presenting and framing implications for students, PIs, and doctoral programs, and recommend providing transparency and candor around the PI and lab selection processes.In the laboratory-based disciplines, selection of a principal investigator (PI) and research laboratory (lab) indelibly shapes doctoral students' experiences and educational outcomes. Framed by the theoretical concept of person-environment fit from within a socialization model, we use an inductive, qualitative approach to explore how a sample of 42 early-stage doctoral students enrolled in biological sciences programs made decisions about fitting with a PI and within a lab. Results illuminated a complex array of factors that students considered in selecting a PI, including PI relationship, mentoring style, and professional stability. Further, with regard to students' lab selection, peers and research projects played an important role. Students actively conceptualized trade-offs among various dimensions of fit. Our findings also revealed cases in which students did not secure a position in their first (or second) choice labs and had to consider their potential fit with suboptimal placements (in terms of their initial assessments). Thus, these students weighted different factors of fit against the reality of needing to secure financial support to continue in their doctoral programs. We conclude by presenting and framing implications for students, PIs, and doctoral programs, and recommend providing transparency and candor around the PI and lab selection processes.
In the laboratory-based disciplines, selection of a principal investigator (PI) and research laboratory (lab) indelibly shapes doctoral students' experiences and educational outcomes. Framed by the theoretical concept of person-environment fit from within a socialization model, we use an inductive, qualitative approach to explore how a sample of 42 early-stage doctoral students enrolled in biological sciences programs made decisions about fitting with a PI and within a lab. Results illuminated a complex array of factors that students considered in selecting a PI, including PI relationship, mentoring style, and professional stability. Further, with regard to students' lab selection, peers and research projects played an important role. Students actively conceptualized trade-offs among various dimensions of fit. Our findings also revealed cases in which students did not secure a position in their first (or second) choice labs and had to consider their potential fit with suboptimal placements (in terms of their initial assessments). Thus, these students weighted different factors of fit against the reality of needing to secure financial support to continue in their doctoral programs. We conclude by presenting and framing implications for students, PIs, and doctoral programs, and recommend providing transparency and candor around the PI and lab selection processes.
Author Roksa, Josipa
Feldon, David F
Wofford, Annie M
Maher, Michelle A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Michelle A
  surname: Maher
  fullname: Maher, Michelle A
  organization: Division of Educational Leadership, Policy and Foundations, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Annie M
  surname: Wofford
  fullname: Wofford, Annie M
  organization: Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Josipa
  surname: Roksa
  fullname: Roksa, Josipa
  organization: Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904
– sequence: 4
  givenname: David F
  surname: Feldon
  fullname: Feldon, David F
  organization: Department of Instructional Technology & Learning Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-2830
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663114$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkM1Lw0AUxBep2A-9epS96SW6H8lm402r1UJBsXouuy8vdSXdrdlE6H9vxAqe5jHM_BjemAx88EjIKWeXnOv8Cixe8iJhWcI4yw7IiBeSJ3nB5eDfPSTjGD8YSxXj2REZSqGU5DwdkWbmfOn8mho6c-01vXWhDmsHpqZLcOgB6V2ANjQ_RtuV6Nt4TpdYI7QueBqqvvncOA9u20fm_gtj69amb1DjS_qCEU0D73RhbA_p7d0xOaxMHfFkrxPyNrt_nT4mi6eH-fRmkUCa6zYpC4u6NJrLqpAWBXCFysrCVJCbLAetwCithbRWZ5KDVFIwmSnI8kqZshITcvHL3Tbhs-tnrTYuAta18Ri6uBKpSDljvGdMyNk-2tkNlqtt4zam2a3-_iS-ATgcbIY
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_jee_20481
crossref_primary_10_1128_jmbe_v22i1_2475
crossref_primary_10_1615_JWomenMinorScienEng_2025051386
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10734_022_00925_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10734_021_00713_8
crossref_primary_10_1108_SGPE_12_2021_0085
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10734_024_01218_w
crossref_primary_10_1080_00221546_2022_2082761
crossref_primary_10_1108_SGPE_09_2023_0089
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0274273
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_20_010136
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_20_020119
crossref_primary_10_1108_SGPE_08_2019_0071
crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21761
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10734_025_01492_2
crossref_primary_10_1103_Physics_17_76
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_022_00392_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_021_00308_w
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_023_02360_z
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1187/cbe.19-05-0105
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1931-7913
ExternalDocumentID 32663114
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
18M
29B
2WC
53G
5GY
6J9
6~0
6~1
ABOPQ
ABSQV
ADBBV
AENEX
AIPOO
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
C1A
CGR
CUY
CVF
DIK
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EE-
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
F9R
GX1
H13
HYE
IAO
IER
IGS
INIJC
ITC
NPM
R0Z
RNS
RPM
TCB
W8F
WOQ
ZBA
7X8
OVT
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-d9be8da813f93be2c16e6b39afc7a57c86ca68823bb8531c36320356c57f6adf2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 27
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000575926300030&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1931-7913
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 12:14:54 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:06:40 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c478t-d9be8da813f93be2c16e6b39afc7a57c86ca68823bb8531c36320356c57f6adf2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.lifescied.org/doi/pdf/10.1187/cbe.19-05-0105
PMID 32663114
PQID 2424100188
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2424100188
pubmed_primary_32663114
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle CBE life sciences education
PublicationTitleAlternate CBE Life Sci Educ
PublicationYear 2020
SSID ssj0046015
Score 2.3801973
Snippet In the laboratory-based disciplines, selection of a principal investigator (PI) and research laboratory (lab) indelibly shapes doctoral students' experiences...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage ar31
SubjectTerms Biological Science Disciplines - education
Career Choice
Humans
Laboratories
Mentoring
Mentors
Students
Title Finding a Fit: Biological Science Doctoral Students' Selection of a Principal Investigator and Research Laboratory
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663114
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2424100188
Volume 19
WOSCitedRecordID wos000575926300030&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEF7UKnjx_agvVhA8xSbZZB9eRMTioZZCFXor-4RektpGof_e2WxqT4LgJZdkIezM7sw3j28Quolz53GyjmJFeZTJhERCSgCumSEZkyq2um4U7rF-n49GYtAE3OZNWeXyTqwvalNqHyPv-DYGzxfE-cP0I_JTo3x2tRmhsY5aBFwZr9Vs9JNFyABs5CGrnHhaRtKQNiacdbSyd759x1euxfnv7mVtZrq7__3BPbTTOJj4MWjEPlqzxQHaCiMnF4do1p3UfSxY4u6kusfhhZcUbo45BrtT-b59PAy8l_NbPKyn5YAIcelg5SBE6OGTFU1HOcOyMHhZyYd7QbvK2eIIvXef355eombuQqQzxqvICGW5kTwhThBlU51QSxUR0mkmc6Y51ZKCZ06UAmOfaEJJGpOc6pw5Ko1Lj9FGURb2FGHHhBVcSplkgFsArIFH43JjlBaKWy3a6Hq5mWPQa5-skIUtP-fj1Xa20UmQyHgaCDjG4HJSAkDu7A-rz9F26iFyXRZ2gVoOTrW9RJv6q5rMZ1e1wsCzP3j9BqsZy2w
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finding+a+Fit%3A+Biological+Science+Doctoral+Students%27+Selection+of+a+Principal+Investigator+and+Research+Laboratory&rft.jtitle=CBE+life+sciences+education&rft.au=Maher%2C+Michelle+A&rft.au=Wofford%2C+Annie+M&rft.au=Roksa%2C+Josipa&rft.au=Feldon%2C+David+F&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.issn=1931-7913&rft.eissn=1931-7913&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=ar31&rft_id=info:doi/10.1187%2Fcbe.19-05-0105&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1931-7913&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1931-7913&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1931-7913&client=summon