Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative

Abstract The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gast...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endoscopy Jg. 49; H. 4; S. 378 - 397
Hauptverfasser: Kaminski, Michal F., Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, Bugajski, Marek, Bretthauer, Michael, Rees, Colin J., Dekker, Evelien, Hoff, Geir, Jover, Rodrigo, Suchanek, Stepan, Ferlitsch, Monika, Anderson, John, Roesch, Thomas, Hultcranz, Rolf, Racz, Istvan, Kuipers, Ernst J., Garborg, Kjetil, East, James E., Rupinski, Maciej, Seip, Birgitte, Bennett, Cathy, Senore, Carlo, Minozzi, Silvia, Bisschops, Raf, Domagk, Dirk, Valori, Roland, Spada, Cristiano, Hassan, Cesare, Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario, Rutter, Matthew D.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Stuttgart · New York Georg Thieme Verlag KG 01.04.2017
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0013-726X, 1438-8812
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 Rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90 %); 2  Cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90 %); 3 Adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25 %); 4 Appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80 %); 5 Complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 Patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 Appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-726X
1438-8812
DOI:10.1055/s-0043-103411