Evaluation of automated and semi-automated skull-stripping algorithms using similarity index and segmentation error

The skull-stripping in the MR brain image appears to be a key issue in neuroimage analysis. In this paper, we evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of both automated and semi-automated skull-stripping methods. The evaluation was performed on both simulated and real data with the ground truth in skul...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Computers in biology and medicine Ročník 33; číslo 6; s. 495 - 507
Hlavní autoři: Lee, Jong-Min, Yoon, Uicheul, Nam, Sang Hee, Kim, Jung-Hyun, Kim, In-Young, Kim, Sun I.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2003
New York, NY Elsevier Science
Elsevier Limited
Témata:
Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - anatomy & histology
False negative rate
False positive rate
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Inter-rater reliability
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Medical sciences
Reproducibility of Results
Similarity index
Simulated T1-weighted MRI
Skull-stripping
False positive rate
Inter-rater reliability
Similarity index
Skull-stripping
False negative rate
Simulated T1-weighted MRI
ISSN:0010-4825, 1879-0534
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:The skull-stripping in the MR brain image appears to be a key issue in neuroimage analysis. In this paper, we evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of both automated and semi-automated skull-stripping methods. The evaluation was performed on both simulated and real data with the ground truth in skull-stripping. Although automated method showed better efficient results, it should require additional intervention. In contrast to that, semi-automated method showed better accurate results, but it was time consuming and prone to operator bias. Therefore, it might be practical that the semi-automated method was used as the post-processing of the automated one.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0010-4825
1879-0534
DOI:10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00022-2