Evaluation of automated and semi-automated skull-stripping algorithms using similarity index and segmentation error
The skull-stripping in the MR brain image appears to be a key issue in neuroimage analysis. In this paper, we evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of both automated and semi-automated skull-stripping methods. The evaluation was performed on both simulated and real data with the ground truth in skul...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Computers in biology and medicine Jg. 33; H. 6; S. 495 - 507 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.11.2003
New York, NY Elsevier Science Elsevier Limited |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0010-4825, 1879-0534 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | The skull-stripping in the MR brain image appears to be a key issue in neuroimage analysis. In this paper, we evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of both automated and semi-automated skull-stripping methods. The evaluation was performed on both simulated and real data with the ground truth in skull-stripping. Although automated method showed better efficient results, it should require additional intervention. In contrast to that, semi-automated method showed better accurate results, but it was time consuming and prone to operator bias. Therefore, it might be practical that the semi-automated method was used as the post-processing of the automated one. |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Undefined-1 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0010-4825 1879-0534 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00022-2 |